strange difference between old and hierachical module names

2003-11-03 Thread Ralf Laemmel
Hi, I am trying to compile some modules with old imports such import MonadFix. These modules compile fine with GHC 6.0 latest RPM, and also on CVS source tree 6.1 somewhere from july. However, the file below does NOT get through with GHC HEAD. I get ... Compiling Foo ( Foo.hs,

[ ghc-Bugs-832920 ] Missing # from #-} elicits utterly opaque error

2003-11-03 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #832920, was opened at 2003-10-30 09:17 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by simonmar You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=832920group_id=8032 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5

RE: strange difference between old and hierachical module names

2003-11-03 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
Good bug report. Now fixed in the HEAD Simon | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:glasgow-haskell-bugs- | [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralf Laemmel | Sent: 03 November 2003 11:10 | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: strange difference between old and hierachical

Bug in 6.0.1

2003-11-03 Thread Matthew Parry
When I load HToolkit 1.2 into GHC 6.0.1 I get the following: --8 mettw ghci -package gio ___ ___ _ / _ \ /\ /\/ __(_) / /_\// /_/ / / | | GHC Interactive, version 6.0.1, for Haskell 98. / /_\\/ __ / /___| | http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ \/\/ /_/\/|_|

Slight doc typos

2003-11-03 Thread Juanma Barranquero
Section 7.4 of the User Guide (or doc source ghc/docs/user_guide/glasgow_exts.sgml) references Haskell 1.4 several times when Haskell 98 would perhaps be more appropriate. Also, section 7.4.10 (Arbitrary-rank polymorphism, same sgml source) has an example with functions f1, g1, f2, g2 and f3, but

RE: Slight doc typos

2003-11-03 Thread Simon Marlow
Section 7.4 of the User Guide (or doc source ghc/docs/user_guide/glasgow_exts.sgml) references Haskell 1.4 several times when Haskell 98 would perhaps be more appropriate. Also, section 7.4.10 (Arbitrary-rank polymorphism, same sgml source) has an example with functions f1, g1, f2, g2

RE: strange difference between old and hierachical module names

2003-11-03 Thread Ralf.Laemmel
SPJ wrote: Good bug report. Now fixed in the HEAD Thanks, but there is now a more serious problem; could be a consequence of the fix. See below a little test file Main.hs and the ghci session for this file using HEAD updated just after your fix. Thanks, Ralf [EMAIL PROTECTED] test]$ more

Building GHC on Mac OS X or Fixing readline

2003-11-03 Thread Kennis Koldewyn
I've attempted to compile GHC 6.01 from sources for Mac OS X, but after a successful configure, make soon grinds to a halt (see Listing 1 below). I'm looking for either: 1. A brief list of tips and tricks for getting GHC to build on Mac OS X (see My Mac below), or 2. A way to fix my