Re: Summary of GHC 6.6 test suite failures on MSYS/MinGW

2006-09-27 Thread Brian Smith
On 9/26/06, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Brian Smith wrote:> Now, when I tried to rerun the tests against the latest ghc-6.6, ghc.exe> is segfaulting on ffi012(ghci), conc049(ghci), and conc023(ghci):>> Unhandled exception at 0x0207fc58 in ghc.exe: 0xC005: Access violation.That's a

Re: [GHC] #867: Integer arithmetic gives the wrong answer on amd64/Linux

2006-09-27 Thread GHC
#867: Integer arithmetic gives the wrong answer on amd64/Linux ---+ Reporter: igloo | Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal| Milestone:

Re: Bogus stats when running SMP programs

2006-09-27 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:03:53PM +0200, Tomasz Zielonka wrote: > Hello! > > I am getting nonsensical execution statistics (+RTS -Sstderr) when > running programs in SMP mode (+RTS -N2). I've found a machine which had the same problem. I think I've fixed it with Thu Sep 28 00:46:30 BST 2006 Ia

Re: [GHC] #710: library reorganisation

2006-09-27 Thread GHC
#710: library reorganisation -+-- Reporter: simonmar| Owner: Type: task| Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.8 Component: libraries

[GHC] #912: Build system is missing various dependencies

2006-09-27 Thread GHC
#912: Build system is missing various dependencies -+-- Reporter: simonmar |Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal|Milestone: Compon

Re: [GHC] #806: hGetBufNonBlocking doesn't work with -threaded on Windows

2006-09-27 Thread GHC
#806: hGetBufNonBlocking doesn't work with -threaded on Windows -+-- Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner: Type: bug | Status: new Priority: normal | Milesto

Re: [GHC] #887: GHCi prints results of IO actions

2006-09-27 Thread GHC
#887: GHCi prints results of IO actions --+- Reporter: guest| Owner: Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: GHCi |Version

Re: Bogus stats when running SMP programs

2006-09-27 Thread Tomasz Zielonka
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 12:06:34PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > >When I compile with -threaded -debug, the stats are OK :-/ > > Ok, maybe try strace? Nothing suspicious, at least for me. Strace logs attached. I'll try to compile GHC from sources and put some debugging prints in the RTS. There ar

Re: Bogus stats when running SMP programs

2006-09-27 Thread Simon Marlow
Tomasz Zielonka wrote: On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 09:25:39AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: Perhaps clock_gettime() is returning strange results on your system. Could you try compiling with -threaded -debug, and run the program under gdb. When I compile with -threaded -debug, the stats are OK :-

Re: Bogus stats when running SMP programs

2006-09-27 Thread Tomasz Zielonka
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 09:25:39AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > Perhaps clock_gettime() is returning strange results on your system. Could > you try compiling with -threaded -debug, and run the program under gdb. When I compile with -threaded -debug, the stats are OK :-/ Best regards Tomasz _

[GHC] #911: Better information about the location of exceptions

2006-09-27 Thread GHC
#911: Better information about the location of exceptions +--- Reporter: simonmar |Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal |Milestone:

Re: [GHC] #880: someFunction :: TypeRep -> Int

2006-09-27 Thread GHC
#880: someFunction :: TypeRep -> Int --+- Reporter: guest| Owner: Type: feature request | Status: closed Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: l

Re: [GHC] #880: someFunction :: TypeRep -> Int

2006-09-27 Thread GHC
#880: someFunction :: TypeRep -> Int --+- Reporter: guest| Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: l

Re: [GHC] #910: --make should have a -j flag for parallel building

2006-09-27 Thread GHC
#910: --make should have a -j flag for parallel building --+- Reporter: igloo| Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone:

Re: Summary of GHC 6.6 test suite failures on MSYS/MinGW

2006-09-27 Thread Simon Marlow
Brian Smith wrote: On 9/26/06, *Simon Marlow* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Brian Smith wrote: > > The test always failed. When I decreased the number of threads in the > test from 5,000 to 1,400 or so, then the tests passed sometimes, and > somet

Re: [GHC] #905: the `impossible' happened: ASSERT failed! file codeGen/ClosureInfo.lhs, line 596

2006-09-27 Thread GHC
#905: the `impossible' happened: ASSERT failed! file codeGen/ClosureInfo.lhs, line 596 --+- Reporter: Misha Aizatulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Owner: Type: bug | Stat

Re: [GHC] #16: Extensionsflags

2006-09-27 Thread GHC
#16: Extensionsflags --+- Reporter: axelkr | Owner: igloo Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: Compiler

Re: [GHC] #910: --make should have a -j flag for parallel building

2006-09-27 Thread GHC
#910: --make should have a -j flag for parallel building --+- Reporter: igloo| Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone:

[GHC] #910: --make should have a -j flag for paralel building

2006-09-27 Thread GHC
#910: --make should have a -j flag for paralel building +--- Reporter: igloo|Owner: Type: feature request | Status: new Priority: normal |Milestone: 6.8

Re: Bogus stats when running SMP programs

2006-09-27 Thread Simon Marlow
Tomasz Zielonka wrote: On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 01:46:30AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: I couldn't reproduce this with a simple program that forked off 4 threads to do computation on a single CPU machine, and neither could someone on IRC with head from Sep 15 on a Core Duo. Is it possible to send u