> The same thing happened to me when I tried to test Dynamic.lhs distributed
> with Hugs98. The library module seems to have been imported from the GHC
> distribution, so it worked only after moving the sub-expressions to the
> top level.
> Dynamic.lhs distributed with GHC and Hugs98 utilizes
On Wed, 09 Aug 2000 00:20:34 +0200, Volker Stolz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *sigh*. I wonder why comments like this in Dynamic.lhs
>
> "Provided the implementor of other @Typeable@ instances
> takes care of making all the @TyCon@s CAFs (toplevel constants),
> this will work."
>
> ...don´t ge
*sigh*. I wonder why comments like this in Dynamic.lhs
"Provided the implementor of other @Typeable@ instances
takes care of making all the @TyCon@s CAFs (toplevel constants),
this will work."
...don´t get written in bold, bright and friendly letters across the
(HTML-)documentation...
Of course
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 14:14:42 +0200, Volker Stolz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I tried using dynamic types, but even the example in Dynamic.lhs fails
> (ghc-4.08):
>
> haskell@monster [14:00:32]> cat > module Main (main) where
>
> > import Dynamic
>
> > main = do
> > putStrLn (let fTy = mkTy
I tried using dynamic types, but even the example in Dynamic.lhs fails
(ghc-4.08):
haskell@monster [14:00:32]> cat module Main (main) where
> import Dynamic
> main = do
> putStrLn (let fTy = mkTyCon "Foo" in show (mkAppTy (mkTyCon ",,") [fTy,fTy,fTy]))
haskell@monster [14:03:18]> $HC -o dynt
