tomasz.zielonka:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:33:37AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
> >> Hello!
> >> Consider:
> >> $ cat R.hs main = return [()]
> >> $ runghc R.hs [()]
> >> This was a bit surprising for me, because I thought that runghc
> >> mimics the way a compiled progr
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:33:37AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
>> Hello!
>> Consider:
>> $ cat R.hs main = return [()]
>> $ runghc R.hs [()]
>> This was a bit surprising for me, because I thought that runghc
>> mimics the way a compiled program behaves.
>
> This doesn't happ
Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
Hello!
Consider:
$ cat R.hs
main = return [()]
$ runghc R.hs
[()]
This was a bit surprising for me, because I thought that runghc
mimics the way a compiled program behaves.
This doesn't happen with 6.6.1, I believe we fixed it at some point by
having runghc perform
Hello!
Consider:
$ cat R.hs
main = return [()]
$ runghc R.hs
[()]
This was a bit surprising for me, because I thought that runghc
mimics the way a compiled program behaves.
Best regards
Tomek
___
Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-bug