On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:53:50PM +0100, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 07:44:58PM +0100, George Russell wrote:
It seems to work when I change hGetBuf to hGetBufNonBlocking. The name
is a bit misleading - the action _does_ wait for some data, but it doesn't
wait for all
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:53:50PM +0100, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 07:44:58PM +0100, George Russell wrote:
It seems to work when I change hGetBuf to
hGetBufNonBlocking. The name
is a bit misleading - the action _does_ wait for some data,
but it doesn't
wait
Done!
Simon
Foo.hs:
Warning: `isJust' is imported more than once:
imported from Maybe at Foo.hs:4:16-21
imported from Maybe at Foo.hs:3:23-28
imported from Maybe at Foo.hs:3:16-21
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:26:02AM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 09:53:50PM +0100, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 07:44:58PM +0100, George Russell wrote:
It seems to work when I change hGetBuf to
hGetBufNonBlocking. The name
is a bit
It's a bug. Now fixed. Test is should_compile/tc174
Thanks for finding it
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:glasgow-haskell-bugs-
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Seefried
| Sent: 30 November 2003 04:01
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Possible
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:39:28AM +0100, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
Well, I think that it would be better if hGetBuf didn't block if all
requested data was already in buffer, but I don't insist on it. However
this change of semantics can brake existing programs.
I am mixing things again:
The
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 11:39:28AM +0100, Tomasz Zielonka wrote:
Well, I think that it would be better if hGetBuf didn't block if all
requested data was already in buffer, but I don't insist on
it. However
this change of semantics can brake existing programs.
I am mixing things
Simon Marlow wrote (snipped):
BTW George: there are plenty of 6.1.xxx snapshots available - these
are the 6.2 prereleases.
There are, but no recent ones. What I would like to have had is a 6.2-epsilon
version, not 6.1 and a bit.
We don't snapshot along the STABLE branch at
the moment; no
Bugs item #860413, was opened at 2003-12-15 15:50
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by simonpj
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=108032aid=860413group_id=8032
Category: Compiler
Group: 6.0.1
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
