Ashley Yakeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 2002-02-19 14:13, Duncan Coutts wrote:
So what I mean is, can we have links to more binaries than just Red Hat?
Debian, Mandrake, FreeBSD. (I know these's SuSE)
Seconded.
I'm not sure what the point would be, if they are in the
distributions
What is the politically correct way using the FFI and ghc5.03
(which I have just managed to compile from
CVS) to import an externally defined object (not a function)?
I have a source file containing the line
foreign label default_options defaultOptions :: CString.CString
for which
It seems to me that it might be very useful for a module to export the
pattern matching operators for a datatype without exporting the
constructors. Suppose we have
data A = X {a::Int, b::Float}
And we want to maintain the invariant that b is a floating-point
representation of a. So
Jim Farrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
both hugs and ghc in their Linux distro *as standard*. This could
significantly help Haskell takeup amongst the unwashed
masses. :-)
Well, same applies for FreeBSD.
And Debian.
So what I mean is, can we have links to more binaries than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ketil Z. Malde) writes:
I'm not sure what the point would be, if they are in the
distributions anyway? Isn't it better to install them by apt-get or
up2date or whatever? (In fact, I had almost thought manually
downloading packages a thing of the past, but then the IT
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On the other hand, you'd need something like mingw for OS/2 - does
such a beast exist?
The substring emx refers to an OS/2 version of gcc and libraries
that make OS/2 look really like Unix from the programmer's point of
view. (It probably even pre-dates
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 03:45:15PM +0200, Lauri Alanko wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 01:37:52PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
Could someone who is Debian-compliant tell me where I should be pointing
for Debian packages?
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/ghc5/
Though of course any
