Ross Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cryptically writes:
> Shouldn't IOError be identified with IOException rather than Exception?
I had to grovel through the code to understand what this question
means. It seems that GHC.IOBase contains these definitions:
type IOError = Exception
data Exc
It is a bug... we weren't printing enough in -fext-core.
I think it's fixed now. (I'm away till Monday.)
Simon
| -Original Message-
| From: Hal Daume III [mailto:hdaume@;ISI.EDU]
| Sent: 29 October 2002 17:57
| To: GHC Users Mailing List
| Subject: problem generating Core with no-implic
Shouldn't IOError be identified with IOException rather than Exception?
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users