ghc fails with this message:
Prologue junk?: .globl __stginit_Main
__stginit_Main:
pushl %ebp
movl%esp, %ebp
It works without -O. I'm on stock Mandrake 9.0 system.
How do I overcome this?
tia
--
anatoli
___
Glasgow-haskell-users
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:56:13PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
>> Absolutely. I didn't mean to sound so GHC-centric. It would be
>> great if the same infrastructure supports multiple
>> compilers/interpreters.
Ross Paterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On the other hand, my impression is that
Nicolas Oury a écrit:
* I think that, if it is not too much complicated, it could be great
to put many threads in the OpenGL OS thread. The goal of concurrent
Haskell was to allow concurrency for expressivity. It would be a pity
to lose this in part of programs for technical reason. Having thi
"Simon Marlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One reason, I think, is lazy I/O(*). It's to stop you accidentally
[...]
> (*) kill it! die! die!
So you want
main = readFile "/dev/zero" >> return ()
to terminate violantly rather than terminate peacefully? :)
Seriously, I understand that the IO
Because List is the H98 module, Data.List is the extended one which
contains foldl'. Regardless of whether you say -package data or not,
you're not going to get Data.List unless you ask for it explicitly:
moussor:multidoc-sum/ ghci -package data
___ ___ _
/ _ \ /\ /\/ __(_)
/ /_\//
On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Hal Daume III wrote:
> If it appears in Data.List then you need to import Data.List. In order to
> do this, you will need a newer (>=5.03) version of GHC, if I'm not
> mistaken.
I find it curious that I can do:
cicero:markc$ ghci -package data
___ ___ _
/ _ \ /
Hello,
I read your proposal. It's great but I have a few remarks :
* I think that, if it is not too much complicated, it could be great to
put many threads in the OpenGL OS thread. The goal of concurrent Haskell
was to allow concurrency for expressivity. It would be a pity to lose
this in part
