Re: stg_ap_v_ret porting crash: solved?

2003-09-10 Thread Matt Chapman
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:06:57AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > Bootstrapping IA64 from x86 (with numerous patches from CVS) looks like > it is working fine, although I am getting > > ghc-6.0.1(9371): unaligned access to 0x41e6177a, ip=0x40dd46c1 > > when compiling even hello wor

Re: stg_ap_v_ret porting crash: solved?

2003-09-10 Thread Donald Bruce Stewart
igloo: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 08:31:40AM +1000, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: > > > > Following the new guide, and the new distrib/hc-build, with the > > fix to .hc file generation on the host that Simon sorted out yesterday. > > > > This generated a working sparc binary. That compiler in turn i

Re: stg_ap_v_ret porting crash: solved?

2003-09-10 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 08:31:40AM +1000, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote: > > Following the new guide, and the new distrib/hc-build, with the > fix to .hc file generation on the host that Simon sorted out yesterday. > > This generated a working sparc binary. That compiler in turn is > recompiling the

RE: Syntax extensions (was: RE: The Future of Haskell discussion at the Haskell Workshop)

2003-09-10 Thread Simon Marlow
[ moved to ghc-users ] > On Wednesday 10 September 2003 07:22 am, Hal Daume III wrote: > > I agree with Malcolm, with the possible addition of: > > > > keep -fglasgow-exts as it is (or, even, perhaps continue > making it the > > "add all extensions keyword). also have -fffi, -farrows, -fth, e

RE: stg_ap_v_ret porting crash: solved?

2003-09-10 Thread Simon Marlow
> $ uname -msr > OpenBSD 3.3 sparc > > $ cat > test.hs > import System.Info > main = print System.Info.arch >> print System.Info.os > > $ > /usr/obj/ports/ghc-6.0.1/ghc-6.0.1/ghc/compiler/ghc-inplace test.hs > > $ ./a.out > "sparc" > "openbsd" Congrats :-) Would you like