Thanks -- in fact we've had a few helpful offers of access (which is v
helpful). We may still yet take you up, but meanwhile don't do too much
work.
So far, no one has offered to help investigate/fix GHC on MacOS, so
progress may be slow. We'd love to hear from keen MacOS users who are
willing
We are pleased to announce the Second Release Candidate phase for GHC 6.6.
Snapshots beginning with 6.5.20061001 are release candidates for 6.6
We would be particularly interested to hear whether or not the 6.6 RC
works for people who were having trouble with 6.4.2.
Also, please note
Bulat == Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bulat Hello Christian,
Bulat Friday, September 29, 2006, 1:02:07 PM, you wrote:
Map (and Set) use (unboxed) Int internally. So bigger Maps and Sets are
not possible.
Bulat interfaces has their own lives :) someone can write DiskMap
Bulat
Dear all, in
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2006-January/009565.html
Simon Peyton-Jones asks for programs that are broken by the proposed
change. Here is a nearly real world one:
{-# OPTIONS_GHC -fglasgow-exts #-}
import Control.Monad
import Control.Monad.ST
import
Mirko Rahn wrote:
In ghc-6.4.2 this works as expected, but ghc-6.5.20061001 says
B.hs:40:44:
A pattern type signature cannot bind scoped type variables `s'
unless the pattern has a rigid type context
Why are the rules for lexically scoped type variables so complicated?
Could we not
| Simon Peyton-Jones asks for programs that are broken by the proposed
| change. Here is a nearly real world one:
You may not like this but this should work:
Instead of
| t1 = runST (trav f [1..10] (1,52) = \ (s::STRef s (Set Int)) - seen
s)
try
t1 = runST ( (trav f [1..10] (1,52) = \ s -
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
| t1 = runST (trav f [1..10] (1,52) = \ (s::STRef s (Set Int)) - seen
s)
try
t1 = runST ( (trav f [1..10] (1,52) = \ s - seen s)
:: forall s. ST s [Int] )
No, the problem is that t1 should use another implementation than t2.
This version cannot
| | t1 = runST (trav f [1..10] (1,52) = \ (s::STRef s (Set Int)) -
seen
| s)
|
| try
|
| t1 = runST ( (trav f [1..10] (1,52) = \ s - seen s)
| :: forall s. ST s [Int] )
|
| No, the problem is that t1 should use another implementation than t2.
| This version cannot discriminate
Oh I see. Well, you'd need to put the type annotation for s back in:
t1 = runST ( (trav f [1..10] (1,52) = \ (s::STRef s (Set Int)) - seen
s)
:: forall s. ST s [Int] )
...and reach the starting point again. This version gives the same error
message as the original one.
But
Ian Lynagh schrieb:
We are pleased to announce the Second Release Candidate phase for GHC 6.6.
Snapshots beginning with 6.5.20061001 are release candidates for 6.6
We would be particularly interested to hear whether or not the 6.6 RC
works for people
This RC works for our (about
Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/dist/
Hello Ian,
Is it on purpose that the lastest windows build does not include
cabal-install?
Since the September builds I don't see any logs for the mingw build?
Rene.
Hello,
Let me make that offer, then, that I would like to help investigate and fix
GHC on MacOS. The obstacles that I have mentioned earlier are ones that I
would eventually have removed in any case, so don't worry, I will not be
wasting any time.
Regards Thorkil
On Monday 02 October 2006
Simon,
I would like to help, but my time is limited and my knowledge of GHC
internals is nearly non-existent. I am, however, very interested in
seeing GHC run on Mac Intel. I particularly want to see the full STM
mechanism, including check, running on the Mac. Are there small
pieces of this
I won't have an Intel mac for another 30 days or so. I intend to do
whatever it takes to get a working ghc 6.6 on that platform.
Is no one working on this port? It seems to me that this should be a
very simple port ( as simple as GHC ports get... ). I am surprised
it isn't done yet.
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 17:06 +0200, Rene de Visser wrote:
Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/dist/
Hello Ian,
Is it on purpose that the lastest windows build does not include
cabal-install?
Yes that is
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 11:02 +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
Map (and Set) use (unboxed) Int internally. So bigger Maps and Sets are
not possible.
Furthermore, unlike lists which can be bigger than can fit in memory,
Data.Map and .Set are strict structures, so you can never have more than
2^32
Hello,
I have an Intel Mac laptop which isn't reliably accessible remotely,
but which I'm happy to use to test and (hopefully) help fix GHC
builds. I'm not positive that I'll have tons of available time, but I
suspect I'll have enough to do at least some good.
Right now, I have the
17 matches
Mail list logo
