Hi,
I just got ghc7 and compiled with ghc6.12.1 and default configuration.
ghc works fine. So I tried to use llvm. I got:
ghc -fllvm badge.hs
[1 of 1] Compiling Main ( badge.hs, /tmp/Main.o )
opt: Bitcode stream should be a multiple of 4 bytes in length
I am using debian 32bit
| known problem with darcs with no obvious solution. For me, switching
| GHC to git would certainly be a win.
I have personal experience of git, because I co-author papers with git users. I
am not very technologically savvy, but my failure rate with git is close to
100%. Ie I can do the
On 8 December 2010 08:28, Magicloud Magiclouds
magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com wrote:
I am using debian 32bit system, llvm 2.6.
I haven't seen your particular error before, but AFAIK -fllvm won't
work with LLVM 2.7 because it depends on the GHC calling convention
that is only present from that
I like Git for Computer Scientists [1] and Git in pictures [2]. It also
sounds like a Git for Darcs users might be in order.
Edward
[1] http://eagain.net/articles/git-for-computer-scientists/
[2] http://blog.nelhage.com/2010/01/git-in-pictures/
___
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Edward Z. Yang ezy...@mit.edu wrote:
I like Git for Computer Scientists [1] and Git in pictures [2]. It also
sounds like a Git for Darcs users might be in order.
Once you got the general ideas down I'd recommend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/8/10 03:45 , Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
| known problem with darcs with no obvious solution. For me, switching
| GHC to git would certainly be a win.
I have personal experience of git, because I co-author papers with git users.
I am not
On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:45 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
If anyone has a favourite how to understand git doc, do point me at it.
You may have already tried these, but I've found the [official git tutorial][1]
to be pretty decent. The [second part][2] contains some details on how git sees
the
Iavor Diatchki wrote:
I use git for a lot of my development...
Given the responses though, it sounds like this is a well
known problem with darcs with no obvious solution.
Why do you say there is no obvious solution? In fact, Ganesh,
representing the Darcs team, responded:
1) a darcs rebase
I've done a bit more chewing away at the branch and have gotten to
19Sep10.
Edward
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
Final status report for tonight, before I crash in bed;
I've managed to make it compile all the way to hoopl.
It seems like hoopl doesn't typecheck anymore? I haven't
been following the typechecker changes too closely so
some guidance would be appreciated.
10 matches
Mail list logo
