On 21 January 2011 23:59, austin seipp a...@hacks.yi.org wrote:
Perhaps Max can
elaborate on why this design was rejected in favor of the current one,
so we can see how and where it falls down, and what we really want.
The only reason really is that it added a lot of mechanism. From the
top of
Hi Austin,
The compiler plugins work is a great, and I'd be a likely user. The
original version wasn't supported on Windows, because GHC on Windows
lacked various forms of dynamic linking. Does the current patch you've
prepared work on Windows?
Thanks, Neil
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Max
(moved into g-h-u mainline to avoid cluttering discussion around new
GHC plans. Anybody who has comments on the plugins work is encouraged
to reply here, not there.)
Neil,
Preemptive TL;DR: I don't quite know, but I'd be willing to work on it.
I seem to remember at the time Max originally did
