Ian Lynagh ig...@earth.li schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:20110729182136.ga2...@matrix.chaos.earth.li...
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 7.2.1:
Is it normal for the windows build to have 99 unexpected failures?
Hello,
I'm a maintainer and creator of GHCJS tool [1].
GHCJS currently uses GHC API to produce Javascript code from Haskell sources.
There is a great interest to the project, but there have been little
progress recently.
I'm considering the future of it and I'd like to get some advices or
On 11-08-01 10:12 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 26/07/2011 22:41, Albert Y. C. Lai wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/haskell-cafe@haskell.org/msg88368.html
The message linked here doesn't really explain *why*, rather it seems to
be a bug report on haskell-cafe (which I don't usually read, so it
Excerpts from Victor Nazarov's message of Tue Aug 02 19:12:55 -0400 2011:
I can parse arguments myself
and throw the rest of them to parseDynamicFlags, but GHC's flags are
really complicated and I'm not aware
of any argument parsing library that can be used to filter out some
specified flags
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 21:09, Edward Z. Yang ezy...@mit.edu wrote:
Excerpts from Victor Nazarov's message of Tue Aug 02 19:12:55 -0400 2011:
But GHC always emit parse error on javascript keyword.
For now I'm using (abusing) ccall calling convention and simple
imports works pretty well,
What is really required is a pluggable back-end infrastructure -
whereby various back-ends could be maintained (or not) at the discretion
of their originators and separate to the official ghc back-ends.
Ideally pluggable back-ends would be installable as packages.
such infrastructure, I
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 00:31, John Lask jvl...@hotmail.com wrote:
What is really required is a pluggable back-end infrastructure - whereby
various back-ends could be maintained (or not) at the discretion of their
originators and separate to the official ghc back-ends.
I guess I'm confused; I
On 3/08/2011 2:10 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 00:31, John Laskjvl...@hotmail.com wrote:
What is really required is a pluggable back-end infrastructure - whereby
various back-ends could be maintained (or not) at the discretion of their
originators and separate to the
