On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Claus Reinke wrote:
>
> What happens after the merges? Does one maintain the branches
> somehow, or does one lose the (in-)dependency information?
Remember that a branch in git is just a name for a point in the revision
graph. When you commit to a branch the name is updated to
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Claus Reinke wrote:
>
> In my understanding, the unorderedness of patch history in darcs is
> there to make distributed repos easier (fewer constraints: same set of
> patches, but not same order; can mix local commits and pulls from
> various repos, no need for a central repo),
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote:
>
> It also seems to make finding buggy patches rather hard.
Have a look at `git bisect`.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
HUMBER THAMES DOVER WIGHT PORTLAND: NORTH BACKING WEST OR NORTHWEST, 5 TO 7,
DECREASING 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 L
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> Tue Jan 16 16:11:00 GMT 2007 Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Remove special lambda unicode character, it didn't work anyway
> Since lambda is a lower-case letter, it's debatable whether we want to
> steal it to mean lambda in Haskell source.
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> New worker threads are spawned on as needed. You'll need as many of
> them as you have simultaneously-blocked foreign calls. If you have 2000
> simultaneously-blocked foreign calls, you'll need 2000 OS threads to
> support them, which probably won'
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Robert Dockins wrote:
>
> What exactly are the semantics of C programs and why do we believe that
> C compilers are correct?
With regards to threading, the semantics are undefined and the compilers
are subtly broken :-)
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.
The following paper seems relevant to this thread. Although it's written
in the context of C and C++, it's relevant to any language that combines
pre-emptive threads and imperative features.
http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-209.pdf
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http:/
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, skaller wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 19:03 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> > BTW, you shouldn't generate identifiers with leading underscores
> > because they are reserved for the implementation.
>
> I AM the implementation :)
You are not the C implementation.
> Generated I
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Lemmih wrote:
>
> From the Network documentation
> (http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/network/Network.html):
> "
> SIGPIPE
>
> On Unix, when reading from a socket and the writing end is closed by
> the remote client, the program is normally sent a SIGPIPE signal
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Peter Davis wrote:
> On 2005-03-16 02:52:39 -0800, Nicolas Oury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > instance Splittable Integer where
> >split n = (2*n,2*n+1)
>
> I haven't played much with the Splittable class yet, but what would be wrong
> with
>
> instance Splittable Integer
Hannah Schroeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 03:55:39AM -0700, Simon Marlow wrote:
>
>> I'm leaning towards Debian at the moment, since it seems about the right
>> level of complexity for the number of bugs we expect to maintain on it (i.e.
>> not many :-).
>
>Seems good. G
Simon Marlow writes:
>
> We also like to get as clean a cpp as possible - if you go through gcc -E
> you get a whole bunch of symbols defined,
The -undef option gets rid of most of those.
> and cpp gets passed the -lang-c flag (whatever that means, but it
> looks pretty scary).
The other possi
Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - mkdependHS and friends need a cpp that accepts input on
> stdin, and files that don't end in ".c". That rules out
> 'gcc -E'.
Use `gcc -E -` then.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Winner, Internatio
13 matches
Mail list logo
