Re: [Haskell-beginners] Performance of parallel mergesort

2009-12-30 Thread Simon Marlow
On 28/12/09 12:56, Yitzchak Gale wrote: On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Jon Harrop wrote: On Sunday 27 December 2009 20:56:51 Stephen Blackheath wrote: Jon Harrop wrote: This is something that concerns me. Lots of discussions of parallelism, including the Haskell literature I have read,

Re: [Haskell-beginners] Performance of parallel mergesort

2009-12-29 Thread Simon Marlow
On 28/12/09 19:01, Jon Harrop wrote: On Monday 28 December 2009 12:56:17 Yitzchak Gale wrote: This discussion definitely does not belong on the Haskell-Beginners list. Besides not being a topic for beginners, being there is keeping it under the radar of many or most of the people who work on

Re: [Haskell-beginners] Performance of parallel mergesort

2009-12-28 Thread Yitzchak Gale
This discussion definitely does not belong on the Haskell-Beginners list. Besides not being a topic for beginners, being there is keeping it under the radar of many or most of the people who work on these things in Haskell. I am moving the discussion to the GHC users list, as suggested by

Re: [Haskell-beginners] Performance of parallel mergesort

2009-12-28 Thread Jon Harrop
On Monday 28 December 2009 12:56:17 Yitzchak Gale wrote: This discussion definitely does not belong on the Haskell-Beginners list. Besides not being a topic for beginners, being there is keeping it under the radar of many or most of the people who work on these things in Haskell. I am

Re: [Haskell-beginners] Performance of parallel mergesort

2009-12-28 Thread Antoine Latter
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Jon Harrop j...@ffconsultancy.com wrote: On Monday 28 December 2009 12:56:17 Yitzchak Gale wrote: This discussion definitely does not belong on the Haskell-Beginners list. Besides not being a topic for beginners, being there is keeping it under the radar of