Ashley Yakeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 2002-02-19 14:13, Duncan Coutts wrote:
So what I mean is, can we have links to more binaries than just Red Hat?
Debian, Mandrake, FreeBSD. (I know these's SuSE)
Seconded.
I'm not sure what the point would be, if they are in the
distributions
Jim Farrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
both hugs and ghc in their Linux distro *as standard*. This could
significantly help Haskell takeup amongst the unwashed
masses. :-)
Well, same applies for FreeBSD.
And Debian.
So what I mean is, can we have links to more binaries than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ketil Z. Malde) writes:
I'm not sure what the point would be, if they are in the
distributions anyway? Isn't it better to install them by apt-get or
up2date or whatever? (In fact, I had almost thought manually
downloading packages a thing of the past, but then the IT
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 03:45:15PM +0200, Lauri Alanko wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 01:37:52PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
Could someone who is Debian-compliant tell me where I should be pointing
for Debian packages?
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/ghc5/
Though of course any
All,
I think that Mandrake deserve thanks for (reasonably) consistently including
both hugs and ghc in their Linux distro *as standard*. This could
significantly help Haskell takeup amongst the unwashed masses. :-)
There should probably be a link on the ghc download page to the mdk binaries.
Jim Farrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
both hugs and ghc in their Linux distro *as standard*. This could
significantly help Haskell takeup amongst the unwashed masses. :-)
Well, same applies for FreeBSD.
And Debian.
So what I mean is, can we have links to more binaries than just Red Hat?
Duncan Coutts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that Mandrake deserve thanks for (reasonably)
consistently including both hugs and ghc in their Linux
distro *as standard*.
While all praise goes to Mandrake (and pixel in particular)
for distributing hugs and ghc, I would just like to point
