Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
for me, GMP is much more problematic issue. strictly speaking, we
can't say that GHC is BSD-licensed because it includes LGPL-licensed
code (and that much worse, it includes this code in run-time libs)
Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
..binary distributions of GHC that
Yitzchak Gale:
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
for me, GMP is much more problematic issue. strictly speaking, we
can't say that GHC is BSD-licensed because it includes LGPL-licensed
code (and that much worse, it includes this code in run-time libs)
Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
..binary distributions
Bulat Ziganshin:
for me, GMP is much more problematic issue. strictly speaking, we
can't say that GHC is BSD-licensed because it includes LGPL-licensed
code (and that much worse, it includes this code in run-time libs)
Of course, GHC is BSD3 licensed. It includes the GMP code as part of
its
Hello Yitzchak,
Thursday, January 10, 2008, 1:06:12 PM, you wrote:
Readline is free software, distributed under the terms of the GNU General
Public License, version 2.
in short, that means that software compiled with this compiler AND
distributed to general audience, should have
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
in short, that means that software compiled with this compiler AND
distributed to general audience, should have GPL-compatible license
(i.e. GPL or BSD-like)
(as far as i understand GPL/LGPL terms)
Any software compiled with this compiler, or only
software that uses
