It strikes me that you might want to play with or steal code from the
Dynamic library if you're disabling/avoiding normal type-checking in
this way. The Dynamic library is a bit limited in what types it can
handle, is fairly high overhead if you are coercing a lot and won't
catch problems where
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 10:57:18AM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > So, is there some wizardry out there which allows using the RTS
> > Linker to load up .o modules which are not created with the FFI?
> > I've been experimenting with it, and I just get segfaults if
> > I try to load the adder_closu
> .. and now, my real reason for posting the previous message 8)
>
> Unfortunately, the big limitation of this is that we're going
> through the FFI to get things to work.
>
> This kinda sucks because that means that the exported functions
> have to stick to exporting one of the prim_types (Int
Here's how I did it... load your main program _and_ modules into a
linker
shell program.
Keean.
Andre Pang wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 04:31:02PM +1000, Andre Pang wrote:
>
> > The concept: You want to have the equivalent of dlopen(); i.e. be
> > able to tell the Haskell runtime syste
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 04:31:02PM +1000, Andre Pang wrote:
> The concept: You want to have the equivalent of dlopen(); i.e. be
> able to tell the Haskell runtime system to import a module and
> call functions in that module. As an example, say there's
> a function called adder:
.. and now, my
Hi all,
Manuel Chakravarty has helped me[1] with getting runtime
importing of modules (a.k.a. dynamic loading) working in GHC on
Linux. It should work on Windows, too.
The concept: You want to have the equivalent of dlopen(); i.e. be
able to tell the Haskell runtime system to import a module an
