I agree that mixing template haskell with -prof can be tricky. It's easier
if you turn off dynamic linking entirely.
As for multi-line string literals, I also think that an explicit syntax
would be nice. Until then, I usually use:
unlines
[ Line 1
, Line 2
]
which ends
On 21:23, Fri, Jan 23, 2015 Evan Laforge qdun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:38 AM, John Lato jwl...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that mixing template haskell with -prof can be tricky. It's
easier if you turn
off dynamic linking entirely.
But that's the thing, I do turn of dynamic
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 1:29 PM, John Lato jwl...@gmail.com wrote:
I mean to use a ghc that's been built without dynamic support.
Oh, so if the whole compiler is not dynamic then TH no longer requires
.dyn_o files? Interesting.
I know they've put a lot of work into this and staging is hard, so
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 2:38 AM, John Lato jwl...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that mixing template haskell with -prof can be tricky. It's easier
if you turn
off dynamic linking entirely.
But that's the thing, I do turn of dynamic linking because I have to
for -prof, but TH seems to require it.
I ran into trouble compiling template haskell with -prof, and came
across the ghc manual 7.9.4. Using Template Haskell with Profiling.
Unfortunately I can't use its advice directly since I put profiling
and non-profiling .o files into different directories. But in
principle it seems it should
