Re: GHC 6.8.1 Build Failure on Mac OS X Intel 10.4.10

On Nov 9, 2007 4:38 AM, Bjorn Bringert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have this in my ~/.profile so that I don't have to keep giving flags to configure for every single thing I build against MacPorts libraries: export CPATH=/opt/local/include export LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/local/lib export

Re: GHC 6.8.1 on Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard)

Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: A full binary distribution of GHC 6.8.1 for Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) is available from http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~chak/haskell/ghc-6.8.1-i386-apple-darwin.tar.bz2 Thanks, it's great you provided a binary distribution, especially since macports' ghc seems to be

Re: -- help needed in packaging ghc-6.8.1

Hi Andrea, On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:28:53AM +0100, Andrea Rossato wrote: 1. the DocBook XSL StyleSheets (probably autoconf related): Slackware installs them in /usr/share/xml/docbook/xsl-stylesheets*, but the I'll apply your patch to fix this. 2. make html fails for libraries.[3]

Re: GHC 6.8.1 on Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger)

Hi Christian, binary distributions of GHC 6.8.1 for Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger) Great, thanks! Can this be posted together with the other binary distributions at: http://haskell.org/ghc/download_ghc_681.html and also Manuel Chakravarty's Leopard build? Warning: this binary distribution does NOT

Re: some links broken in 6.8.1 documentation

Hi Daniil, On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 03:49:54PM +0300, Daniil Elovkov wrote: A quick look at the 6.8.1 user's guide reveals some broken links: 1) Obtaining code coverage, pointing to http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.8.1/html/users_guide/hpc.html redirects to

Re: 6.8.1 compilation error on Sun Solaris 9

Hi Robert, On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 10:16:09AM +0100, Robert Andersson wrote: ./../includes/GHCConstants.h:1:25: Not in scope: `zd' Does changing line 36 of includes/mkDerivedConstants.c from #ifdef mingw32_HOST_OS to #if defined(mingw32_HOST_OS) || defined(solaris2_HOST_OS) fix it? I also

Re: ANNOUNCE: GHC version 6.8.1

Hi Philip, On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 09:58:40AM +0100, Philip K.F. Hölzenspies wrote: Booting libraries/base Booting libraries/directory /usr/share/aclocal/progsreiserfs.m4:13: warning: underquoted definition of AC_CHECK_LIBREISERFS run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' or see

RE: Extensible Records

6.10? I think that's a typo as the current version is 6.8.1. Or did I misunderstand what you were saying? Seth Kurtzberg Software Engineer Specializing in Security, Reliability, and the Hardware/Software Interface -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Extensible Records

I misread it as 6.1. Sorry about that. -Original Message- From: Stefan O'Rear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 6:55 PM To: Seth Kurtzberg Cc: 'Voldermort'; glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org Subject: Re: Extensible Records On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 06:35:34PM

Re: Extensible Records

On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 06:35:34PM -0500, Seth Kurtzberg wrote: 6.10? I think that's a typo as the current version is 6.8.1. Or did I misunderstand what you were saying? 6.8.1 is released, there is abolutely no way new features are going to enter a published version. Hence, 6.10. Stefan

Re: Extensible Records

On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 06:35:34PM -0500, Seth Kurtzberg wrote: Is there any chance of seeing extensible records in GHC 6.10? There seems to be widespread agreement that the current situation is unacceptable, but the official GHC policy is that there are too many good ideas to choose from -

Re[2]: Extensible Records

Hello Stefan, Sunday, November 11, 2007, 2:54:51 AM, you wrote: Is there any chance of seeing extensible records in GHC 6.10? I second this request +1 -- Best regards, Bulatmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___