hsing-chou chen wrote:
Thank you for porting GHC 6.8.2 to solaris, I am assigned a
job to make sure GHC run 64 bits on solaris.
Good, I was waiting for (someone like) you!
I'm interested in a true 64 bits GHC on solaris, too, but I have no idea
how to build one. I hope Ian or Simon can help
Simon Marlow wrote:
hsing-chou chen wrote:
Thank you for porting GHC 6.8.2 to solaris, I am assigned a
job to make sure GHC run 64 bits on solaris. Is your
solaris port 64 bits. Or it only 32 BITS. I know 32 bits
GHC can still run on 64 bits solaris. However company want
to run really 64
Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
The ./setup build causes a segmentation fault. This is for every
project I try (including ones with very default Setup.hs contents).
I can at least reproduce the segmentation fault by running my PPC-Tiger
binary on an i386-Leopard, by compiling with additional options
Could you create a ticket for this (or is there one already)? I'm
willing to recompile ghc-6.8.2 with different options or patches on PPC
Tiger, but even compiling via-C does not work (not to mention
bootstrapping from hc sources).
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2012
(Only few seem
Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
ld: atom sorting error for
_fastcgizm3001zi0zi1_NetworkziFastCGI_FCGXzuStream_closure_tbl and
_fastcgizm3001zi0zi1_NetworkziFastCGI_FCGXzuRequest_closure_tbl in
dist/build/Network/FastCGI.o
According to Wolfgang Thaller's answer to a previous post by yourself,
Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
$ ./HelloWorld-Tiger
Hello World!
$ ./HelloWorld-Leopard
Bus error
only setting
export MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.4
on Leopard during compilation should make it run on a Tiger, too.
HTH Christian
___
Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
Christian Maeder:
export MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.4
Specifically, I am seeing
dyld: bind: ghc-6.9.20080219:_fcntl$UNIX2003$lazy_ptr =
libSystem.B.dylib:_fcntl$UNIX2003, *0x0108a413 = 0x92c7b7bc
what tells you that this is Leopard specific?
on running
Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
As far as I know -- and I wish to be wrong -- there is no known way to
get a fully working ghc-6.8.x on OS 10.5.y on the PowerPC (PPC)
architecture.
One problem left was:
m29:fastcgi-3001.0.1 maeder$ ./Setup build
Segmentation fault
I could work around this by using
Hi,
my binary distribution
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/6.8.2/maeder/ghc-6.8.2-i386-unknown-linux.tar.bz2
creates binaries that fail on some i386 linux boxes with:
timer_create: Invalid argument
I've built the distribution with
gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)
and the
Gregory Wright wrote:
Leopard/ppc are out of luck until for now, for reason discussed earlier
on this list.
I was able to build ghc 6.8.2 on Leopard/ppc using the patch from
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1958
(also below)
Could you try if it works for you, too?
Cheers Christian
Christian Maeder wrote:
Gregory Wright wrote:
Leopard/ppc are out of luck until for now, for reason discussed earlier
on this list.
I was able to build ghc 6.8.2 on Leopard/ppc using the patch from
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/1958
(also below)
Could you try if it works
Ian Lynagh wrote:
Hi Christian,
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 05:59:50PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
#define HAVE_TIMER_CREATE 1
Or is there a work around (apart from creating a new binary-dist using
ghc-6.6.1)?
I don't think using ghc 6.6.1 will make a difference.
At least our ghc-6.6.1
Hi Greg,
I can't test it myself because I don't have root access to our machines.
Maybe someone else can?
(Meanwhile I'll try to make a binary-dist that includes the extra-libs.)
Cheers Christian
Gregory Wright wrote:
Hi Christian,
I built a new bootstrapping compiler on Tiger/ppc,
Simon Marlow wrote:
Unfortunately this means that taking a GHC binary built on a newer Linux
will not work on an older version.
Do you know by chance which linux library (or rpm package) needs to be
updated (if I run such an old version)?
timer_create() is needed so that we can avoid needing
Christian Maeder wrote:
Simon Marlow wrote:
Unfortunately this means that taking a GHC binary built on a newer Linux
will not work on an older version.
Do you know by chance which linux library (or rpm package) needs to be
updated (if I run such an old version)?
It seems to be glibc. Can
Alfonso Acosta wrote:
It would be awsome if a PPC/Lepoard installation package was made
available from GHC's page.
I can offer
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/agbkb/forschung/formal_methods/CoFI/hets/mac/ghcs/ghc-6.8.2-powerpc-apple-darwin-static-libs.tar.bz2
but also see
Conal Elliott wrote:
I have an algebraic data type (not newtype) that derives Ord:
data AddBounds a = MinBound | NoBound a | MaxBound
deriving (Eq, Ord, Read, Show)
The class Ord is not suited for partial orders. If you write your own
Ord instances anyway, I'd suggest to
Conal Elliott wrote:
AddBounds makes total orders from total orders. It just adds new least
and greatest elements.
The problem with the derived instance is that it doesn't exploit the
potential laziness of min on 'a'. Because of their types, min it can
produce partial info from partial
Conal Elliott wrote:
The type argument I ran into trouble with represents a value as a list
of increasing lower bounds, ending in the exact value. min produces
lower bounds from lower bounds and so is immediately productive before
even knowing which argument is the lesser one.
Is this only
Christian Maeder wrote:
Conal Elliott wrote:
The type argument I ran into trouble with represents a value as a list
of increasing lower bounds, ending in the exact value. min produces
lower bounds from lower bounds and so is immediately productive before
even knowing which argument
(resent this request for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to glasgow-haskell-users)
Hi,
could the actual change-diff of patches also be posted via this list (or
a web-link to the change)? I think this was the case with the old cvs
repository.
This would teach a bit Haskell programming and how to write
Christian Maeder wrote:
could the actual change-diff of patches also be posted via
the list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just see that patches sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] have a link to
the actual patch. I.e.
View patch online:
http://darcs.haskell.org/cabal-install/_darcs/patches/20080329194426-adfee
Don Stewart wrote:
hp:
I convinced myself that the ~500kbytes for the
'hello' code is 'correct' in version 6.6.1.
[ The exact size on the platform mentioned below
is 422k. ]
Looks like version 6.8.2 blows up the binary code size
significantly --- 3.9Mbytes vs 0.422Mbytes.
Is this a known
see http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/2312
-split-objs is passed to stage1/ghc-inplace when building the library,
yet there's only at most one part for each module.
Cheers Christian
Simon Marlow wrote:
-bash-3.00$ ghc --info
[(Project name,The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation
For those without root rights I've made a plain distribution that relies
on gmp and readline under /opt/local/ (for 9.3.0 Darwin Kernel)
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/agbkb/forschung/formal_methods/CoFI/hets/intel-mac/ghcs/ghc-6.8.2.20080603-i386-apple-darwin.tar.bz2
Christian
Manuel M
Hi,
I've created the following binary distributions, but -- like Serge
Mechveliani -- I'm not very happy with the results, because the created
binaries are much bigger.
http://www.dfki.de/sks/hets/pc-solaris/ghcs/ghc-6.8.3-i386-unknown-solaris2.tar.bz2
Simon Marlow wrote:
That's odd - I measured binary sizes thoroughly before the release and
didn't see any difference between 6.8.3 and 6.8.2.
The size of ghc itself did not increase.
Perhaps -split-objs got lost somewhere? Or maybe you upgraded gcc at
some point?
No (at least I don't
Hi Simon,
maybe you can suggest a global flag setting that avoids too much
inlining during optimization.
Cheers Christian
Christian Maeder wrote:
No (at least I don't think so). I suspect that we some expensive class
instances (for our class Logic). Here is a list of our biggest
object
Judah Jacobson wrote:
Christian, did you compile this distribution on a G5 PowerPC?
Yes!
GMP is
statically linked into this distribution, so if it's using any
processor-specific instructions I could see that tripping up my G4.
If you or someone else can confirm that this works on a G5, then
Since I've switched back from ghc-6.8.3 to ghc-6.8.2 I would like to see
a new minor ghc version 6.8.4 with this bug fixed.
Cheers Christian
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
As I said to Serge, I *think* all this arises from the *unconditional* inlining
of instance declarations, which isn't under
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
As I said to Serge, I *think* all this arises from the *unconditional* inlining
of instance declarations, which isn't under flag control unfortunately. The
only fix at the moment is to write instance decls whose code is small -- just
call a separate top-level
Johannes Waldmann wrote:
nm /usr/local/lib/libncurses.so.5|grep main
[1192] | 0| 0|NOTY |GLOB |0|UNDEF |main
I get no output at all.
Christian
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
Hi,
What happened to the haskell cvs server? I used to get the programatica
sources from there.
But
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs co -P programatica
times out.
monk.galois.com (69.30.63.197)
Cheers Christian
___
Glasgow-haskell-users
Benjamin L.Russell wrote:
Is there any scheduled release date for GHC 6.8.3 for Mac OS X 10.5
(Leopard) on PowerPC G4 machines?
No, but I could rebuild ghc-6.8.3 on Tiger (G5) so that it also runs on
a G4. (The G5 dependency of
static binaries then move the static library
libgmp.a into your installed ghc's libdir.
Cheers Christian
Christian Maeder wrote:
Benjamin L.Russell wrote:
Is there any scheduled release date for GHC 6.8.3 for Mac OS X 10.5
(Leopard) on PowerPC G4 machines?
No, but I could rebuild ghc-6.8.3
Hi Daniil
I have a binary dist here:
http://www.dfki.de/sks/hets/solaris/ghcs/ghc-6.8.3-sparc-sun-solaris2.tar.bz2
that runs and was built with gcc-4.0.3 on Solaris 8 sparc. It runs under
Solaris 10 with gcc-4.2.2, too. (It also runs with gcc-3.4, but
building fails as in #951). I've not
Daniil Elovkov wrote:
[...]
Btw, the link you gave me is not on haskell.org/ghc. For 6.8.3 only
solaris-x86 is downloadable. That's why I grabbed 6.8.2 in the first
place.
[..]
I have a binary dist here:
http://www.dfki.de/sks/hets/solaris/ghcs/ghc-6.8.3-sparc-sun-solaris2.tar.bz2
Ian, you
Hi,
I've install HsSVN (version 0.3.3) using ghc-6.8.3 and Cabal-1.4.0.1,
but it was a real pain (under i686 Linux 2.6.22.18-0.2-default #1 SMP)
1. I had to install subversion-devel-1.4.4-30 (of course)
2. configure went through after setting:
export
Ian Lynagh wrote:
Right now we have the source bundles:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-6.10.0.20080921-src.tar.bz2
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-6.10.0.20080921-src-extralibs.tar.bz2
I've tried to build a binary dist on x86 under Solaris and did not
-0.71.0.1, regex-posix-0.72.0.2,
rts-1.0, stm-2.1.1.1, syb-0.1.0.0, template-haskell-2.3.0.0,
time-1.1.2.1, unix-2.3.1.0, xhtml-3000.2.0.1
Christian Maeder wrote:
5. When trying to install the binary distribution I got:
Installing executable(s) in /local/home/maeder/bin
installPackage: dist
Judah Jacobson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Christian Maeder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But finally installation succeeded (editline is missing and the arrow
keys don't work).
This means that the editline package could not be built for some
reason. Is this on your OS X machine
to the gmp and
readline whims on Macs.)
Cheers Christian
Christian Maeder wrote:
checking editline/readline.h usability... no
checking editline/readline.h presence... no
checking for editline/readline.h... no
checking editline/editline.h usability... no
checking editline/editline.h presence
Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:32:51PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
Do you have libedit on your linux machine (because I haven't)?
I do not know what is libedit and where to find it.
It's the library needed for editline
http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage
Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 03:32:40PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
Ian Lynagh wrote:
Right now we have the source bundles:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-6.10.0.20080921-src.tar.bz2
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/ghc-6.10.0.20080921-src
There seems to be a problem with ncurses 5.6
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2008-July/015044.html
We have Version 5.0.3.
You may try (originally for
SunOS leo 5.10 Generic_137111-02 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R) from
.
Cheers Christian
Elliott Slaughter wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Christian Maeder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seems to be a problem with ncurses 5.6
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2008-July/015044.html
We have
Hi Judah,
after installing rpm packages
libedit0-2.10.snap20070831-5
libedit-devel-2.10.snap20070831-5
I get the error below for cabal install editline
Cheers Christian
checking editline/readline.h usability... yes
checking editline/readline.h presence... yes
checking for
Ian Lynagh wrote:
Please test as much as possible; bugs are much cheaper if we find them
before the release!
How about a test-suite?
Cheers Christian
P.S. make binary-dist creates a big unnecessary .tar file together
with the final .tar.bz2 file. Also a (disturbing) link
ghc-6.10.0.20081007 -
Christian Maeder wrote:
Hi Judah,
after installing rpm packages
libedit0-2.10.snap20070831-5
libedit-devel-2.10.snap20070831-5
I just noticed that this libedit version works for editline-0.2.0.0
within 6.10.0.20081007
Cheers C.
___
Glasgow
Hi,
I've installed libedit-20080712-2.11 (from sources) for
ghc-6.10.0.20081007 under x86 Solaris.
However, ghci comes up with:
GHCi, version 6.10.0.20081007: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
Loading package ghc-prim ... linking ... done.
Loading package integer ... linking ... done.
Hi,
Denis wanted to install pandoc form MacPorts and got problems (below),
because he has installed my ghc-6.8.3-powerpc binary. If my binary works
you could download
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pandoc/1.0.0.1/pandoc-1.0.0.1.tar.gz
unpack and do the
runhaskell Setup
Judah Jacobson wrote:
Strange; it seems like terminfo isn't looking in the right location
for the xterm files. Incidentally, the dumb terminal settings may
be deficient when you type a line longer than the terminal width.
What OS is this? Did you download and install (n)curses manually?
Hi,
I've got errors when compiling with ghc-6.10.0.20081007
Not in scope: `readEither'
It is imported via:
import GHC.Read (readEither)
and used to work with ghc-6.8.
What should I use as replacement?
Cheers Christian
P.S. It is also not mentioned in the changes:
Ian Lynagh wrote:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/stable/dist/6.10.1-rc-1/rc.html
My testsuite results can be found under:
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/agbkb/forschung/formal_methods/CoFI/hets/mac/ghcs/ghc-6.10.0.20081007-tests.log.bz2
Hi,
currently I've got a problem installing from hackage.
using:
GHC (package manager) version 6.10.0.20081019
cabal-install version 0.6.0
using version 1.6.0.1 of the Cabal library
I get:
Building network-2.2.0.0...
Network/URI.hs:128:7:
Could not find module `Data.Generics':
Hi,
currently I've got a problem installing from hackage.
using:
GHC (package manager) version 6.10.0.20081019
cabal-install version 0.6.0
using version 1.6.0.1 of the Cabal library
I get:
Building network-2.2.0.0...
Network/URI.hs:128:7:
Could not find module `Data.Generics':
Duncan Coutts wrote:
The basic problem here is that the version number of the network package
has not been bumped.
see below
You probably installed from a ghc bindist that has
network-2.2.0.0 already,
Yes, you're right, and I didn't notice that, because I relied on cabal
install.
however
just to correct a false impression. One part of my problem (point 3.
below) was a wrong hsc2hs program that was found in my PATH by accident
(that also caused
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/cabal-devel/2008-October/003980.html)
Cheers Christian
Christian Maeder wrote:
Hi,
I've install
Hi,
the documentation of extra libraries is listed under
share/doc/ghc/libraries/
1. Is it possible to add cabal packages in the same way? How?
2. It would be nice if the cabal-install (i.e. the binary cabal) came
with ghc. Currently zlib, HTTP and cabal-install have to be (awkwardly)
installed
Hallo Judah,
I've build
http://www.thrysoee.dk/editline/libedit-20080712-2.11.tar.gz
and it was linked against libcurses:
-bash-3.1$ ldd /usr/local/lib/libedit.so.0
libcurses.so.1 =/lib/libcurses.so.1
libc.so.1 = /lib/libc.so.1
libgcc_s.so.1 =
I can offer a Tiger PPC built that works for me:
http://www.dfki.de/sks/hets/intel-mac/ghcs/ghc-6.10.1-i386-apple-darwin.tar.bz2
(linked against /opt/local/lib/libgmp.dylib)
Cheers Christian
Chris Kuklewicz wrote:
I am having trouble compiling GHC using mac ports on powerpc OS X
(10.5.5)
James Swaine wrote:
That still didn't do anything. Here's the exact error text I'm getting:
error while loading shared libraries: libedit.so.0: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [cabal-bin] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory
James Swaine wrote:
I can't seem to get the latest source bundle to build (running on Red
Hat). I run the configure script, then make on the source tree root,
and ghc gives an error to the effect of 'could not load shared object
file or library libedit.so.0'. I don't have root permissions on
Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 01:19:25PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
http://www.dfki.de/sks/hets/intel-mac/ghcs/ghc-6.10.1-i386-apple-darwin.tar.bz2
http://www.dfki.de/sks/hets/mac/ghcs/ghc-6.10.1-powerpc-apple-darwin.tar.bz2
Thanks Christian, I've put these up
Jason Dagit wrote:
But, I still think I did something wrong because the first thing I
tried to build with 6.10 complained that -lgmp was not found. I have
checked, it's installed and I saw the ./configure script for the 6.10
installation find it.
Actually I have the same problem. I need to
Christian Maeder wrote:
Jason Dagit wrote:
But, I still think I did something wrong because the first thing I
tried to build with 6.10 complained that -lgmp was not found. I have
checked, it's installed and I saw the ./configure script for the 6.10
installation find it.
Actually I have the same
Jason Dagit wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Christian Maeder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also note that gmp.h will not be found without:
export CPATH=/opt/local/include
This directory should be part of the include-dirs: for the rts
package. And again the file /opt/local/include/gmp.h
Hi,
recently (last Friday) I had a chance to use MacPorts to install gtk2hs.
(Usually I do not have root permissions to do so.)
Actually, I only wanted to install the libraries needed to run a gtk2hs
application that I've created on another machine. On that other machine
gtk was (painfully)
gcc version 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5488) worked for me. I think it
comes from XCode 3.1 together with @(#)PROGRAM:ld PROJECT:ld64-85.2.1
XCode 3.0 with gcc version 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465) and
@(#)PROGRAM:ld PROJECT:ld64-77 works only on intel macs but not on
powerpc macs.
HTH Christian
How did you call gmake? editline is not needed for ghc. When building
the libraries with the stage1 compiler I get:
...
touch stamp/configure.library.build-profiling-splitting.editline ||
touch editline/unbuildable
Configuring editline-0.2.1.0...
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler
David Menendez wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade GHC to 6.10.1 using macports on a PowerBook G4
running OS X 10.5.5. From what I can tell, I'm getting a segmentation
fault from cabal-bin.
On PPC leopard you need to update to XCode 3.1
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/MacOSX
Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 15:49 +0100, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
Does this version work from ghci?
-- Lennart
Specifically I believe Lennart is asking about Windows. It's worked in
ghci in Linux for ages and it worked in ghci in Windows prior to the
0.9.13 release.
Brian Bloniarz wrote:
I got confused by the GHC documentation recently, I was wondering how
it could be improved. From:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/bang-patterns.html
Seeing the rule
pat ::= !pat
you'll probably want to avoid patterns like: !!pat, ! ! pat, or ~ !
Brian Bloniarz wrote:
I got confused by the GHC documentation recently, I was wondering how
it could be improved. From:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/bang-patterns.html
cite
The let-binding can be recursive. However, it is much more common for
the let-binding to be
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
| cite
| The let-binding can be recursive. However, it is much more common for
| the let-binding to be non-recursive, in which case the following law
| holds: (let !p = rhs in body) is equivalent to (case rhs of !p - body)
| /cite
|
| Shouldn't the bang be removed
Ian Lynagh wrote:
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 6.10.2:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/6.10.2-rc1/
Under Solaris grep does not understand -q in configure:
checkMake380() {
if $1 --version 21 | head -1 | grep -q 'GNU Make 3\.80'
it fails with:
grep:
requests:
unix = 2.0 2.4
Changing to = 2.4 was not sufficient, so I changed it to = 2.5.
This will affect any OS!
Testsuite results are bad for ghc-6.10.1.20090314, see
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/3106
Cheers Christian
Christian Maeder wrote:
Ian Lynagh wrote:
We
Ralph Crawford wrote:
ln -s /usr/lib/libm.so.1 $BOS_ROOT/lib/libm.so.2
You need an actual libm.so.2 library that contains the missing symbols.
To this library you set a link libm.so in a directory that is in the
front of your LD_LIBRARY_PATH, so that libm.so.2 instead of libm.so.1 is
found via
Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 11:09 +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
./bootstrap.sh: !: not found
Under Solaris sh is not bash!
Indeed.
According to the OpenGroup that syntax should be fine:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html#tag_02_09_02
Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 04:00:09PM +0100, Christian Maeder wrote:
Under Solaris grep does not understand -q in configure:
checkMake380() {
if $1 --version 21 | head -1 | grep -q 'GNU Make 3\.80'
it fails with:
grep: illegal option -- q
Usage: grep -hblcnsviw pattern
Hi,
building ghc-6.10.3 under x86 solaris eventually failed with:
Configuring ghc-bin-6.10.3...
cabal-bin: At least the following dependencies are missing:
haskeline -any
gmake[3]: *** [boot.stage.2] Error 1
I think, haskeline is not build because libiconv is missing:
-bash-3.00$ ./Setup
When building ghc-6.10.3 I've noticed again:
1. ghc-pkg check:
There are problems in package rts-1.0:
include-dirs: PAPI_INCLUDE_DIR doesn't exist or isn't a directory
after make binary-dist I'm left with an unnecessary .tar file and a
link (ghc-6.10.3 - .). The mere *.tar.bz2 file would do
Christian Maeder wrote:
Hi,
building ghc-6.10.3 under x86 solaris eventually failed with:
[...]
Configuring haskeline-0.6.1.5...
checking whether to use -liconv... Setup: Unable to link against the
iconv library.
I wonder how this check for -liconv is generated. I have a file
/usr
Maybe a binary distribution for Mac OS Tiger would be useful.
(I prefer the plain .tar.gz files over .pkg, because they don't require
root rights.) I usually make them using a file mk/build.mk containing:
BIN_DIST=1
Project=Ghc
HADDOCK_DOCS = YES
#XMLDocWays = html
using the commands:
Ian Lynagh wrote:
We are pleased to announce the first release candidate for GHC 6.10.4:
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/6.10.4-rc1/
Worked like a charm for me under x86 Solaris.
Cheers Christian
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Ian Lynagh wrote:
==
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.10.4
==
Packages will appear as they are built - if the package for your
system isn't
P.S. before installing the Haskell-Platform
look at http://trac.haskell.org/haskell-platform/ticket/74
and take measures to avoid loosing your profiling libs.
(Either by not re-installing the listed packages or by re-installing
them with profiling switched on.)
Cheers
Christian Maeder wrote
Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Christian,
Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 1:35:07 PM, you wrote:
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/agbkb/forschung/formal_methods/CoFI/hets/pc-solaris/ghcs/ghc-6.10.4-i386-unknown-solaris2.tar.bz2
is it compatible with OpenSolaris too? if so, it's great, my
Thomas Schilling wrote:
Forgot to include the list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Thomas Schilling nomin...@googlemail.com
Date: 2009/7/22
Subject: Re: Generating valid Haskell code using the GHC API pretty printer
To: Jan Schaumlöffel j...@informatik.uni-kiel.de
The
Simon Marlow wrote:
On 22/07/2009 10:35, Christian Maeder wrote:
For sparc-solaris 10 I could not run the testsuite (with GNU Make 3.80)
What went wrong?
Building went ok, despite the following warning at the end of ./configure:
WARNING: It looks like gmake is GNU make 3.80.
This version
Simon Marlow wrote:
SDM: I'd guess your gmp.h is dropping definitions for some inline
functions into the code.
gmp for ghc was taking from the ghc-sources, but maybe my gcc uses
/usr/local/include/gmp.h nevertheless (because that's a system path).
+tcfail126.hs:11:0:
+Failed to load
Simon Marlow wrote:
SDM: I don't have a ghc-mtl library. Where does that come from?
I see ghc-mtl for the first time, too.
It's probably in your user package DB, installed as a dependency of
something else. The testsuite should be ignoring your user package DB;
I'll fix that.
For some
Ian Lynagh wrote:
This error refers to the line
$(eval $(call canonicalise,PREFIX))
in timeout/Makefile.
Hmm, this test:
-
HAVE_EVAL := NO
$(eval HAVE_EVAL := YES)
ifeq $(HAVE_EVAL) NO
$(error Your make does not support eval. You need GNU make = 3.80)
endif
Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:35:07AM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
Ian Lynagh wrote:
==
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.10.4
Christian Maeder wrote:
Could you also remove (or correct) the line
It needs libncurses.5.dylib and libgmp.3.dylib under /opt/local/lib/
for both Mac dists, because I've included gmp statically.
Please also correct:
My PowerPC dists works on Leopard only not on Tiger!
Christian
Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:35:07AM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
Ian Lynagh wrote:
==
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 6.10.4
Christian Maeder wrote:
For some reason a ghc-mtl was built when compiling from source. Also
haskeline-0.6.1.5, terminfo and test is no package later on.
This test-1.0 package contains module A and was installed by test case
cabal01(normal) that failed with the Syntax: tar {c|r|t|u|x} error
Ian Lynagh wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 04:39:53PM +0200, Christian Maeder wrote:
eval works, but abspath does not!
Does make give the expected abspath error with this patch to testsuite/?
Yes:
-bash-3.00$ gmake
mk/boilerplate.mk:12: *** Your make does not support abspath. You need
GNU
Don Stewart wrote:
Heads up lads, we're about 24 hours from Haskell Platform 2009.2.0.2
http://code.haskell.org/haskell-platform/haskell-platform.cabal
I still see
time ==1.1.2.4,
although ghc-6.10.4 comes with:
time-1.1.4
Hi,
I've just been informed that unpacking the binary (i386) solaris
distribution using bunzip2 and tar:
bunzip2 -c ghc-6.10.4-i386-unknown-solaris2.tar.bz2 | tar xvf -
does not work properly! Use instead:
gtar jxvf ghc-6.10.4-i386-unknown-solaris2.tar.bz2
File names longer than a hundred
1 - 100 of 490 matches
Mail list logo
