On Wed, Oct 06, 1999 at 12:04:03 +0200, Sven Panne wrote:
Michael Weber wrote:
marshalListN :: Int - [a] - IO Addr
I don't see a reason for the duplication of length information, e.g.
what should `marshalListN 1000 [1,2,3]' mean? And
`marshalListN 2 [1,2,3]' is equivalent
[My apologies: some day - I promise - I'll learn to choose the right mailing
list... 8-]
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 13:45:43 +0200, Sven Panne wrote:
[micro-marshalling]
I know Manuel's code already and the one H/Direct produces. Has anybody
else some FFI-related code and/or suggestions? This
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 14:33:57 +0200, George Russell wrote:
(1) The repository is very puritanical about having to have autoconf and
happy installed. Since the chances of my wanting to muck about with the
configuration file/GHC parsers are nill, why not include the configure
Hi!
subject says it all... :-)
They packages for the unstable distribution are available at:
http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Software/Haskell/
or via APT installation method: just add
deb http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Software/Haskell/debian unstable/
deb-src
Hi!
Is there any more information floating around wrt. the Dynamic extensions of
GHC (or hugs)?
The lib-docs say, it may be usable in Distributed Programming, but currently
I have no idea how to transport values of type Dynamic over some kind of net
connection to another instance of a program
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 15:34:51 +0200, George Russell wrote:
Einar Karlson, my predecessor, asked for daemonic forking as for Java. In
Java you have ordinary threads and daemonic threads; the process ends when
only daemonic threads are still running. The GHC team seem to have gone
ahead
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 12:39:06 +0200, George Russell wrote:
It would be nice if the ghc command had options which made it call
a different hsc/gcc/ld than the one hardwired by the installation
procedure into the Perl script. Currently I am playing games with
my PATH to achieve this effect.
On Tue, Jul 13, 1999 at 03:26:27 -0700, Simon Marlow wrote:
Use `gcc -E -` then.
Good point :-)
nearly..., but we have to use '$CPP -x c-header' which would expand to
'gcc -E -x c-header', otherwise gcc wants to link those temporary *.lpp
files :-(
IMHO '-x c-header' just means to gcc:
On Tue, Jul 13, 1999 at 17:47:27 +0900, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty wrote:
Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
It isn't strictly speaking hardcoded, it's set up when you configure a
binary distribution. So if you move gcc or install a new version, you need
to re-install ghc.
Yes, and
Hi!
Please, can somebody explain, why the preprocessor is hardcoded in the GHC
perl scripts? IIRC ghc (the perlscript itself) doesn't even reference
$RAWCPP. mkdependHS and hscpp do, but why an absolute path and this obscure
"-iprefix" parameter? Again, "-iwithprefix" is never used...
Would it
On Sun, Dec 05, 1999 at 16:35:42 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
I'm using a GHC binary package from Debian GNU/Linux, binary package
version 4.04.19990916-0slink1 built by Michael Weber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. As soon as I get it to compile
I'll try a compiler installation I built myself
The subject says it all, just wanted to show-off a bit ;-)
Thanks to Aaron Van Couwenberghe for sponsoring the packages...
However, I'll keep the Haskell page up running, usually, you'll find new
versions some days earlier here...
Cheers,
Michael
--
Lehrstuhl-Gärtnerei Michael
-files-too ...
Cheers,
Michael
--
Lehrstuhl-Gärtnerei Michael Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lehrstuhl für Informatik II
RWTH Aachen
WWW: http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Software/Haskell/
-BeleuchtungMichael Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lehrstuhl für Informatik II
RWTH Aachen
WWW: http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Software/Haskell/
the messages...
--
Lehrstuhl-Gärtnerei Michael Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lehrstuhl für Informatik II
RWTH Aachen
WWW: http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Software/Haskell/
s,
Michael
--
Lehrstuhl-Kinderkrippe Michael Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lehrstuhl für Informatik II
RWTH Aachen
WWW: http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Software/Haskell/
tement?
Is there another possible reason for this behaviour?
(ghc-4.07, CVS version 2000/05/04)
[Sorry, but I was unable to find a small example, that triggers this "bug".
Things like (tryAll (runST (return (error "BANG" work as expected]
Cheers,
Michael
--
Lehrstuhl-Kind
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 07:30:18 -0700, Simon Marlow wrote:
If you embed the (error "BANG") inside a data structure, then it can indeed
excape from the tryAll because seq only evaluates to WHNF.
Thanks a bunch, that pointed me in the right direction!
tryAll (runST (return (error
and MutableArrays.
- remove the MutableArray interface from
hslibs/lang/MutableArray. This module will go
away soon - Andy, don't bother porting it to Hugs.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Lehrstuhl-Kinderkrippe Michael Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lehrstuhl für Informatik II
RWTH Aachen
WWW
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 04:38:21 -0700, Simon Marlow wrote:
Ok, here's my proposal for the version numbering issue. I think we should
bite the bullet and fix the numbering scheme to something sensible now, even
though it means changing version 4.07 to be called 4.08. Any objections?
[Xposted to ghc-users haskell mailing lists]
Hi!
I'd like to announce (finally!) the first OFFICIAL PRE-release :) of
hMPI, a Haskell binding for a message passing interface conforming to
the MPI 1.1/1.2 standard.
It's available from
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 21:08:21 -0400, Benjamin Leon Russell wrote:
Do you have any plans on making a Windows 9x/NT/2000-compatible
version anytime soon?
Well, unfortunately, I don't have access to a Windoze box with a GHC
installed[1], so I just had no chance of testing it. Therefore, I
"Bill Halchin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
[...] I think it was "gpm". [...]
~~~
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 20:44:19 +1000, Manuel M . T . Chakravarty wrote:
The painless approch is to install the gpm package that ghc
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 12:23:19 -0400, Kirsten R. Chevalier wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to compile a program using GHC 4.08 on a Linux system, and I'm
getting an error simply consisting of "AClass", with no output files from
the compiler. When I compile with -v, I get the following output:
The
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 10:23:31 +0200, Volker Stolz wrote:
When configuring a recent ghc, ./configure complains about not finding
DOCBOOK - which is no wonder as it keeps looking in strange hardcoded
places like /usr/lib. Could someone please enlighten me about what changes
would be
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 10:04:55 -0700, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
POSIX.1 only defines #defined constants upto B38400, so anything
beyond that is non-standard [...]
... which does not necessarily imply, that GHC is not going to
support it ;-)
Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
Can these missing rates be
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 17:24:04 +0200, George Russell wrote:
On this subject, where am I to get the libgmp2.a required by 4.08.1
(on Linux anyway). I tried compiling the very latest version of GMP
but it only produced a libgmp.a file. Is that the same?
Everyone and their brothers is
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 17:39:54 +0200, Michael Weber wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 17:24:04 +0200, George Russell wrote:
On this subject, where am I to get the libgmp2.a required by 4.08.1
(on Linux anyway). I tried compiling the very latest version of GMP
but it only produced a libgmp.a
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 18:35:23 +0200, Wolfhard Bu wrote:
Hello,
i just built and installed ghc 5.00 from the sources
with the help from ghc 4.08.2.
ghci responds with 'ghc-5.00: not built for interactive use'.
just rebuild ghc-5.00 with itself again.
Cheers,
M/
--
/~\ ASCII ribbon |
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 21:36:04 +0200, Johannes Waldmann wrote:
A slightly related point, I was having difficulties with TimeDiff
values - I got negative tdPicosecs sometimes,
and some functions (show) even dumped core.
Are such problems known (I am using a binary ghc-4.08)?
For the
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 5.00
We are pleased to announce a new major release of the Glasgow Haskell
Compiler (GHC), version 5.00. The source distribution is freely
available via the World-Wide
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 15:00:08 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
Mon, 16 Apr 2001 00:15:39 +1000, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze:
The source tar ball misses the configure scripts (it has the
`configure.in's, but the source tar ball should be
autoconf'ed, shouldn't
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 16:44:54 +0200, Michael Weber wrote:
The (Interactive) Glasgow Haskell Compiler -- version 5.00
We are pleased to announce a new major release of the Glasgow Haskell
Compiler (GHC), version 5.00
* Marc van Dongen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-05-11T10:52+0100]:
Manuel M. T. Chakravarty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[received message twice]
Am I just the only one or does everybody receive
messages posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] twice? I find
it a bit (I know I am
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:32:47 +0200, Volker Stolz wrote:
Maybe I'm the only one who happens to type
:q! to leave ghci all the time, maybe not.
Would somebody object to a patch which will cause
ghci to quit on :q!?
Oh, and I want C-x C-c
... and C-K Q while we're at it... ;-p
(No, this is
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 19:54:11 +0100, Chris Webb wrote:
Jose Emilio Labra Gayo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, if I write my own .ghci, I obtain:
[...]
*** WARNING: ./.ghci is writable by someone else, IGNORING!
If doing this annoys you too much, I guess you could easily fix the
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 03:18:33 -0700, Ashley Yakeley wrote:
At 2001-10-25 03:01, Simon Marlow wrote:
I've wondered at various times in the past whether there ought to be a
link from /usr/local/includes/ghc to /usr/local/lib/ghc-5.02/includes.
Won't help, my GHC is installed at
* Denver [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001-10-26T01:25+1000]:
Please help. I would like to use HOpenGL within Windows, so I wanted
to ask whether it was possible, and if it is, I would like to request
for help. Any help greatly appreciated.
Hi!
I'm sorry, I don't know much about the
on ;)
Why not?
I'm sure Michael Weber is working on it even as we speak...
ETA is next weekend.
Cheers,
Michael
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:36:05AM -0800, Hal Daume III wrote:
You can't. CSE (common subexpression elimination) will replace any
occurances of 'newState 0' in a function body with the same value.
In short: don't use upIO :)
Sorry, cannot resist to pour a little salt onto the wound :)
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:09:01AM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
It is nice, but it introduces too many problems. What happens to any
I/O errors encountered by the lazy I/O? They have to be discarded,
which means you can't effectively use lazy I/O for robust applications
anyway.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:22:56AM -0500, Dean Herington wrote:
Is even the following example from the library report (section 11.8.2)
problematic?
import System
import Char( toUpper )
main = do
[f1,f2] - getArgs
s - readFile f1
writeFile f2 (map toUpper s)
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 02:37:03AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 06:13:27AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
Thanks, I've started brewing up a tree and I'll take that for a spin
when it's done cooking.
ouch! jadetex needs an upgrade (ghc debian
* Kirsten Chevalier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-03-17T01:09-0800]:
configure says:
checking for sendfile in sys/sendfile.h... no
checking for sendfile in sys/socket.h... no
I tried building again just now, just to be sure, and still got the same error
message (Sendfile.hsc:19: Variable not in
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-10-21T11:39+0200]:
Now, Haskell takes 4.57 the time of C++ (cygwin gnu C++ with -O2).
Did you add the SSE options etc. to the C++ program as well when
comparing Haskell vs. C++? What is the SSE speedup of C++
vs. C++/with SSE?
Cheers,
Michael
45 matches
Mail list logo
