On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
pkara...@redhat.com wrote:
hi,
When iozone is in progress and the number of blocking inodelks is
greater than the threshold number of rpc requests allowed for that client
(RPCSVC_DEFAULT_OUTSTANDING_RPC_LIMIT), subsequent requests
I did now. I'd recommend adding a check for libintl.h in configure.ac and
fail gracefully suggesting installing gettext.
Thanks
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Dennis Schafroth den...@schafroth.dkwrote:
On 05 Apr 2014, at 07:38 , Anand Avati av...@gluster.org wrote:
And here:
./gf-error
Build fails for me:
Making all in libglusterfs
Making all in src
CC libglusterfs_la-dict.lo
CC libglusterfs_la-xlator.lo
CC libglusterfs_la-logging.lo
logging.c:26:10: fatal error: 'libintl.h' file not found
#include libintl.h
^
1 error generated.
make[4]: ***
in /usr/local and but require sudo right
underway to sett rights
brew install gettext
It will require setting some CFLAGS / LDFLAGS when ./configure:
LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/opt/gettext/lib
CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/opt/gettext/include
cheers,
:-Dennis
On 05 Apr 2014, at 06:56 , Anand Avati av
Because futimes() is not a POSIX (or any standard) call. We can have
#ifdefs and call futimes(), but hasn't been a priority (welcome to send a
patch)
Thanks
Avati
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Thiago da Silva thi...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
While testing libgfapi I noticed that
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.comwrote:
On 03/24/2014 08:35 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
I've been begging for an additional (+2) review for
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/6737. It has two +1 reviews, but the
matching fixes for release-3.5 and master
(moving to gluster-devel@)
That is great progress! Please keep posting the intermediate work upstream
(into gerrit) as you move along..
Regarding the hang: Do you have cli.log printing anything at all (typically
/var/log/glusterfs/cli.log)
Avati
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Dennis
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Jeff Darcy jda...@redhat.com wrote:
As a counterpoint to the current GlusterFS proposal, I've written up a
bunch of
ideas that I'm collectively calling GlusterFS Quattro. It's in Google
Docs so
that people can comment. Please do. ;)
http://goo.gl/yE3O4j
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Jeff Darcy jda...@redhat.com wrote:
Given the background, it only makes sense to retain the guiding
principles of
the feedback, and reconcile the changes proposed to management layer in
the
two proposals and retain the scope of 4.x to management changes.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Krishnan Parthasarathi kpart...@redhat.com
wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com
wrote:
Adding gluster-devel.
On 03/06/2014 01:15 PM, Krishnan Parthasarathi wrote:
All,
Xavi,
Getting such a caching mechanism has several aspects. First of all we need
the framework pieces implemented (particularly server originated messages
to the client for invalidation and revokes) in a well designed way.
Particularly how we address a specific translator in a message originating
The nop xlator by itself seems OK. Have you tried the stripe config with
the nop xlator on top? or even without the nop xlator?
Avati
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Lluís Pàmies i Juárez
llpam...@pamies.catwrote:
Hello,
As a proof of concept I'm trying to write a xlator that does nothing,
I agree. I will send out a spin of the 2nd draft soon. Have been caught up
in a bunch of other stuff.
Avati
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Amar Tumballi ama...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:30 AM, Jeffrey Darcy jda...@redhat.com wrote:
I know we're all busy with other
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 5:58 AM, James purplei...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/13/2013 04:05 AM, James wrote:
I just noticed that the Gluster Gerrit [1] doesn't use HTTPS!
Can this be fixed ASAP?
Configured now,
I have a fix in the works for this (with more cleanups to locks xlator)
Avati
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Raghavendra Bhat rab...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
There seems to be a bug in the ltable cleanup when disconnect is received
in 3.5 and master. Its easy to reproduce. Just create a
James,
This is the right way to think about the problem. I have more specific
comments in the script, but just wanted to let you know this is a great
start.
Thanks!
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:42 AM, James purplei...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This is along the lines of tools for sysadmins. I plan
Hello all,
Here is a working draft of the plan for 4.0. It has pretty significant
changes from the current model. Sending it out for early review/feedback.
Further revisions will follow over time.
https://gist.github.com/avati/af04f1030dcf52e16535#file-plan-md
Avati
The decision of doing away with -O2 is beyond our control, and we shouldn't
have code which depend on optimization to be disabled to behave properly.
Representing -errno as return is the cleanest fix (that's how other
projects which use setcontext/getcontext are behaving too.) If there are
any new
Mohan,
It would be better to approach this problem by defining the FOPs and
behavior at the xlator levels, and let gfapi calls be simple wrappers
around the FOPs. We can introduce new FOPs splice() and reflink(), and
discuss more on the best MERGE semantics.
Avati
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:48
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Muralidhar Balcha muralidh...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I have couple of questions on rebalance functionality
1. When I ran rebalancing command, the gluster daemon that is responsible
for migrating data is terminating itself in the middle of the data
migration. I
Lala,
It would be ideal if we hooked this into Jenkins and run along with
regression test in parallel. How feasible is it to set it up that way?
Avati
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Lalatendu Mohanty lmoha...@redhat.comwrote:
Hi Gluster Ants,
There is a way, we can automate the Coverity
you can:
curr_offset = glfs_lseek (glfd, 0, SEEK_CUR)
Avati
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Brad Childs b...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello list,
I'm trying to find the current offset of an open file through libgfapi. I
have the glfs_fd_t of the file, i've done some reading and want to know
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Jeff Darcy jda...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/18/2013 11:32 PM, Anand Avati wrote:
It might be interesting to build a test harness using libgfapi
(specially the handle based APIs) to load a graph with the xlator to be
test (on top of posix) and using gfapi calls
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Luis Pabon lpa...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm definitely up for it, not just for the translators, but as Avati
pointed out, a test harness for the GlusterFS system. I think, if
possible, that the translator test harness is really a subclass a GlusterFS
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org wrote:
Anand Avati av...@gluster.org wrote:
If you call fallocate() over an existing region with data it shouldn't be
wiped with 0s. You can also call fallocate() on a hole (in case file was
ftruncate()ed to a large size
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Shyamsundar Ranganathan
srang...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Darcy jda...@redhat.com
To: gluster-dev Gluster Devel gluster-devel@nongnu.org
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 8:04:27 PM
Subject: [Gluster-devel] Translator test
If you call fallocate() over an existing region with data it shouldn't be
wiped with 0s. You can also call fallocate() on a hole (in case file was
ftruncate()ed to a large size) and that region should get allocated (i.e
future write to an fallocated() region should NOT fail with ENOSPC).
BTW,
Ravi,
We should not mix up data and entry operation domains, if a file is in data
split brain that should not stop a user from rename/link/unlink operations
on the file.
Regarding your concern about complications while healing - we should change
our manual fixing instructions to:
- go to
Both rebalance and self-healing are actually run in lower priority by
default. You can disable this low priority by:
# gluster volume set name performance.enable-least-priority off
Avati
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Paul Cuzner pcuz...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I was asked today about the
Eric,
Thanks for the insights. I have posted a patch at
http://review.gluster.org/6201 which clarifies the usage of
glfs_readdir_r() and also introduce glfs_readdir().
Thanks,
Avati
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/30/2013 11:18 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
This was fixed upstream, and backported to release-3.4 as well. The fix
will be part of 3.4.2.
Avati
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm trying to use glusterfs-api, but ran into some questions on usage
(currently targetting Fedora 19's
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/30/2013 04:08 PM, Anand Avati wrote:
Eric,
Thanks for the insights. I have posted a patch at
http://review.gluster.org/6201 which clarifies the usage of
glfs_readdir_r() and also introduce glfs_readdir().
Thanks
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hmm, I don't think so.. strncpy of 255 bytes on to a buffer guaranteed to
be 256 or higher and also guaranteed to be 0-memset'ed cannot return an
invalid file name. No?
The fact that your internal glfs_readdir buffer is
glfs_mkdir() (in glfs.h) accepts three params - @fs, @path, @mode. gfapi.py
uses raw ctypes to provide python APIs - and therefore the bug of not
accepting and passing @mode in the mkdir() method in gfapi.py is
translating into a junk value getting received by glfs_mkdir (and random
modes getting
is typeless. Python
ctypes uses dlopen/dlsym which do symbol lookups - doesn't care whether the
looked up symbol is a data structure or a function name - let alone do type
matching!
Avati
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Anand Avati av...@gluster.org wrote:
glfs_mkdir() (in glfs.h) accepts
dict_get_uint64(dirent-xdata,
FSIZE_XATTR_PREFIX)
Please look at how posix-acl does something very similar (loading per-entry
ACLs into respective inodes via xattrs returned in readdirplus)
Avati
Thanks,
Edward.
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:27:01 -0700
Anand Avati av...@redhat.com wrote:
Edward
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/6031/ (patch to remove replace-brick data
migration) is slated for merge before 3.5. Review comments (on gerrit)
welcome.
Thanks,
Avati
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Anand Avati av...@gluster.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 8:57 AM, KueiHuan Chen kueihuan.c
[2013-10-08 17:33:36.662549] I [glusterfsd.c:1910:main]
0-/usr/sbin/glusterd: Started running /usr/sbin/glusterd version 3.4.1
(/usr/sbin/glusterd --debug)
...
[2013-10-08 17:33:36.664191] W [xlator.c:185:xlator_dynload] 0-xlator:
/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.4.0/xlator/mgmt/glusterd.so:
h2:/b2 h1:/b1 start .. commit
Let me know if you still have questions.
Avati
Thanks.
Best Regards,
KueiHuan-Chen
Synology Incorporated.
Email: khc...@synology.com
Tel: +886-2-25521814 ext.827
2013/9/30 Anand Avati av...@gluster.org:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:56 AM, James purplei
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org wrote:
Justin Clift jcl...@redhat.com wrote:
Towards this we need some extensions to gfapi that can handle object
based operations. Meaning, instead of using full paths or relative paths
rom cwd, it is required that we can
to an in memory per-graph inode? A per operation
handle to a dentry? In the current form, it does not seem to fit any of the
these categories.
Avati
Shyam
--
*From: *Anand Avati av...@gluster.org
*To: *Shyamsundar Ranganathan srang...@redhat.com
*Cc: *Gluster Devel
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Anand Avati av...@gluster.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Shyamsundar Ranganathan
srang...@redhat.com wrote:
Avati, Amar,
Amar, Anand S and myself had a discussion on this comment and here is an
answer to your queries the way I see it. Let
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Anand Avati av...@gluster.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Anand Avati av...@gluster.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Shyamsundar Ranganathan
srang...@redhat.com wrote:
Avati, Amar,
Amar, Anand S and myself had a discussion
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Amar Tumballi ama...@gmail.com wrote:
I plan to send out patches to remove all traces of replace-brick data
migration code by 3.5 branch time.
Thanks for the initiative, let me know if you need help.
I could use help here, if you have free cycles to pick
Now consider what happens in case of READDIRPLUS. A list of names and
handles
are returned to the client. The list of names can possibly include names
which were previously looked up as well. Both are supposed to represent
the
same gfid, but here will be returning new glfs_objects. When
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Shyamsundar Ranganathan
srang...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Shyamsundar Ranganathan srang...@redhat.com
To: gluster-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: ana...@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 1:48:19 PM
Subject: RFC/Review:
.
- Original Message -
From: Anand Avati av...@gluster.org
To: Shyamsundar Ranganathan srang...@redhat.com
Cc: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@nongnu.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 11:39:27 AM
Subject: Re: RFC/Review: libgfapi object handle based extensions
Minor comments
Also note that the same glfs_object must be re-used in readdirplus (once we
have a _h_ equivalent of the API)
Avati
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Anand Avati av...@gluster.org wrote:
I see a pretty core issue - lifecycle management of 'struct glfs_object'.
What is the structure
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:56 AM, James purplei...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 00:35 -0700, Anand Avati wrote:
Hello all,
Hey,
Interesting timing for this post...
I've actually started working on automatic brick addition/removal. (I'm
planning to add this to puppet-gluster
Adding Brian Foster (and gluster-devel) for the discussion of unified UI
for snapshotting.
Mohan, I must have missed your comment. Can you please point to the
specific patch where you posted your comment?
Avati
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:29 AM, M. Mohan Kumar mohankuma...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:37 PM, haiwei.xie-soulinfo
haiwei@soulinfo.com wrote:
hi,
Our patch for this bug, running looks good. smbd will not exit with
oom-kill. But it's not correct method.
git version: release-3.4/886021a31bdac83c2124d08d64b81f22d82039d6
diff --git
I have a theory for #998967 (that posix-acl is not doing the right thing
after chmod/setattr). Preparing a patch, will appreciate if you can test it
quickly.
Avati
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Lukáš Bezdička lukas.bezdi...@gooddata.com
wrote:
No, I see issues reported in
Can you please confirm if http://review.gluster.org/5979 fixes the problem
of #998967 for you? If so we will backport and include the patch in 3.4.1.
Thanks,
Avati
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Anand Avati av...@gluster.org wrote:
I have a theory for #998967 (that posix-acl is not doing
, Anand Avati av...@gluster.org wrote:
Can you please confirm if http://review.gluster.org/5979 fixes the
problem of #998967 for you? If so we will backport and include the patch
in 3.4.1.
Thanks,
Avati
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Anand Avati av...@gluster.org wrote:
I have a theory
the issue with patch #2 from
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/5979/
Thank you.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Anand Avati av...@gluster.org wrote:
Please pick #2 resubmission, that is fine.
Avati
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Lukáš Bezdička
lukas.bezdi...@gooddata.com wrote
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Shyamsundar Ranganathan
srang...@redhat.com wrote:
Avati,
Please find the updated patch set for review at gerrit.
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/5936/
Changes made to address the points (1) (2) and (3) below. By the usage of
the suggested glfs_resolve_inode
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 18.09.2013 19:04, Nux! wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build and test samba-glusterfs-vfs, but problems appear
from the start:
http://fpaste.org/40562/**95274621/ http://fpaste.org/40562/95274621/
Any pointers?
Anyone from devel
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Shyamsundar Ranganathan
srang...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Anand Avati av...@gluster.org
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 11:09:37 PM
Shyam,
Thanks for sending this out. Can you post your patches to
review.gluster.org
Anand,
This is a great first step.. Looking forward for the integration to mature
soon. This is a big step for supporting NFSv4 and pNFS for GlusterFS.
Thanks!
Avati
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 3:18 AM, Anand Subramanian ana...@redhat.comwrote:
FYI, the FSAL (File System Abstraction Layer) for
I think you might need this - http://review.gluster.org/5896
Avati
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Justin Clift jcl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
Building on F19 with current Gluster master head seems broken
atm. Looks related to the QEMU code.
Have we added a new compilation dependency
Thanks for confirming Justin! Niels, do you know why rpm.t regression test
is failing on your patch?
Avati
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Justin Clift jcl...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 13:37 -0700, Anand Avati wrote:
I think you might need this - http://review.gluster.org
mo...@in.ibm.com wrote:
Anand Avati anand.av...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Shishir,
Its possible to overload writev FOP for achieving zerofill
functionality. Is there any open issues with this zerofill functionality
even after overloading in writev?
Shishir,
Is this in reference to the dht
, Anand Avati anand.av...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello everyone,
We are in the process of formalizing the governance model of the
GlusterFS project. Historically, the governance of the project has been
loosely structured. This is an invitation to all of you to participate in
this discussion
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 1:46 AM, Xavier Hernandez xhernan...@datalab.eswrote:
Al 04/09/13 18:10, En/na Anand Avati ha escrit:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Xavier Hernandez xhernan...@datalab.eswrote:
Al 04/09/13 14:05, En/na Jeff Darcy ha escrit:
On 09/04/2013 04:27 AM, Xavier
on
fop_XXX_stub(), and not necessarily fop_XXX_cbk_stub()
Change-Id: Idf979f14d46256af0afb9658915cc79de157b2d7
BUG: 846240
Signed-off-by: Anand Avati av...@redhat.com
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/4520
Tested-by: Gluster Build System jenk...@build.gluster.com
Reviewed-by: Jeff Darcy jda
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Stephen Watt sw...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Folks
We are pleased to announce a major update to the glusterfs-hadoop project
with the release of version 2.1. The glusterfs-hadoop project, available at
The glusterfs-hadoop project team, provides an Apache licensed
On 09/01/2013 11:26 AM, M. Mohan Kumar (Code Review) wrote:
Hello Anand Avati, Gluster Build System,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
http://review.gluster.org/4809
to look at the new patch set (#4).
Change subject: bd: posix/multi-brick support to BD xlator
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Xavier Hernandez xhernan...@datalab.eswrote:
Al 04/09/13 14:05, En/na Jeff Darcy ha escrit:
On 09/04/2013 04:27 AM, Xavier Hernandez wrote:
I would also like to note that each node can store multiple elements.
Current implementation creates a node for each
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Xavier Hernandez xhernan...@datalab.eswrote:
Hi,
dict_t structures are widely used in glusterfs. I've some ideas that could
improve its performance.
* On delete operations, return the current value if it exists.
This is very useful when we want to get a
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Xavier Hernandez xhernan...@datalab.eswrote:
Al 03/09/13 09:33, En/na Anand Avati ha escrit:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Xavier Hernandez xhernan...@datalab.eswrote:
Hi,
dict_t structures are widely used in glusterfs. I've some ideas that
could improve
[cc'ing gluster-devel on the final consensus]
On 08/30/2013 01:19 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
On 08/30/2013 04:01 PM, Anand Avati wrote:
On 8/30/13 7:50 AM, Brian Foster wrote:
On 08/30/2013 09:51 AM, Brian Foster wrote:
On 08/29/2013 09:08 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Anand Avati (Code Review
For those interested in what are the possible patches, here is a short list
of commits which are available in master but not yet backported to
release-3.4 (note the actual list 500, this is a short list of patches
which fix some kind of an issue - crash, leak, incorrect behavior,
failure)
Setting in xdata has the benefit of getting propagated to server side
without change in protocol. However that being said, dict_t in its current
form is not the most efficient data structure for storing a lot of
key/values (biggest concern being too many small allocations). It will be
good to
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org wrote:
Anand Avati anand.av...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a tricky problem. I have thought about this quite a bit and
couldn't come up with a theory which can lead to this behavior. I am
suspecting this might be a 32/64bit
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com wrote:
File size as reported on the mount point and the bricks can vary because
of this code snippet in iatt_from_stat():
{
uint64_t maxblocks;
maxblocks = (iatt-ia_size + 511) / 512;
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/26/2013 10:04 PM, Anand Avati wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com
mailto:vbel...@redhat.com wrote:
File size as reported on the mount point and the bricks can vary
it take to reproduce this problem?
Avati
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org wrote:
Hi
Did you had a loog on it? ANy idea on what is going on?
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 07:21:13AM +0200, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Anand Avati anand.av...@gmail.com wrote:
I
Shishir,
Is this in reference to the dht open file rebalance (of replaying the
operations to the destination server)? I am assuming so, as that is
something which has to be handled.
The other question is how should fallocate/discard be handled by self-heal
in AFR. I'm not sure how important it
Justin,
Thanks for firing up this thread. Are there notable projects which use
these frameworks? Do you have any info on what other distributed storage
projects use for their automated testing?
Thanks,
Avati
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Justin Clift jcl...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Deepak C Shetty
deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 07/29/2013 12:18 AM, Anand Avati wrote:
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Vijay Bellur vbel...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi All,
There was a recent thread on fedora-devel about bloated glusterfs
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Kaushal M kshlms...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
We recently had a mailing list discussion about the current problems
with peer identification and handling multiple networks. This proposal
is regarding better identification of peers.
Currently, the way we
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Deepak C Shetty
deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 08/14/2013 01:37 PM, Anand Avati wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Deepak C Shetty
deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 07/29/2013 12:18 AM, Anand Avati wrote:
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Harshavardhana
har...@harshavardhana.netwrote:
Actually this *wasnt* what we discussed. glusterfs-api was supposed to
depend on glusterfs-libs *ONLY*. This is because it has a linking (hard)
relationship with glusterfs-libs, and glusterfs.rpm is only a
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Deepak C Shetty
deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 08/14/2013 02:23 PM, Anand Avati wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Deepak C Shetty
deepa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 08/14/2013 01:37 PM, Anand Avati wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Justin Clift jcl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 14/08/2013, at 7:43 AM, Anand Avati wrote:
Justin,
Thanks for firing up this thread. Are there notable projects which use
these frameworks?
Autotest is used by the Linux kernel (its main claim to
fame
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Guido De Rosa guido.der...@vemarsas.itwrote:
Well, there's another problem, possibly related, that I didn't notice: I'm
unable to mount!
(Although libgfapi is meant to bypass fuse-mount, I've read that you need
FUSE working in the same machine where you issue
Emmanuel,
I was going through your log files again. Correct me if I'm wrong, the
issue in the log is with the file tparm.po, right?
Avati
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org wrote:
Hi
I am back on to this problem. I would like to debug it butI need some
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.comwrote:
On 08/05/2013 05:42 AM, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
On 08/05/2013 02:41 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:59:32AM +0530, Deepak C Shetty wrote:
IIUC, per the prev threads.. glusterfs package has a dep
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Jeff Darcy jda...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/31/2013 07:35 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote:
I was trying to fire some regression builds on very minor patches today,
and
noticed (always known, but faced pain of 'waiting' today) that we can
fire
regression build on
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Balamurugan Arumugam
barum...@redhat.comwrote:
- Original Message -
From: Joe Julian j...@julianfamily.org
To: Pablo paa.lis...@gmail.com, Balamurugan Arumugam
b...@gluster.com
Cc: gluster-us...@gluster.org, gluster-devel@nongnu.org
Sent:
On 7/31/13 4:35 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to fire some regression builds on very minor patches today,
and noticed (always known, but faced pain of 'waiting' today) that we
can fire regression build on only one patch (or a patchset if its
submitted with dependency added while
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.comwrote:
On 07/31/2013 07:35 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to fire some regression builds on very minor patches today,
and noticed (always known, but faced pain of 'waiting' today) that we
can fire regression
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.comwrote:
On 07/31/2013 07:51 AM, Anand Avati wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY kkeit...@redhat.com
mailto:kkeit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/31/2013 07:35 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote:
Hi
On 7/19/13 1:14 AM, Vijay Bellur (Code Review) wrote:
Vijay Bellur has submitted this change and it was merged.
Change subject: fuse: auxiliary gfid mount support
..
fuse: auxiliary gfid mount support
* files can be accessed
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Anand Avati anand.av...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Roberto De Ioris robe...@unbit.itwrote:
Hi everyone, i have just committed a plugin for the uWSGI application
server
for exposing glusterfs filesystems using the new native api
but they
just took forever to get pushed out into an official release.
I'm in favor of closing some bugs and risking introducing new bugs for
the sake of releases happening often.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Anand Avati anand.av...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello everyone,
We
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Bryan Whitehead dri...@megahappy.netwrote:
Weekend activities kept me away from watching this thread, wanted to
add in more of my 2 cents... :)
Major releases would be great to happen more often - but keeping
current releases more current is really what I
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Roberto De Ioris robe...@unbit.it wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Anand Avati anand.av...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am assuming the module in question is this -
https://github.com/unbit/uwsgi/blob/master/plugins/glusterfs/glusterfs.c
.
I
see
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 29.07.2013 07:16, Daniel Müller wrote:
But you need to have gluster installed!? Which version?
Samba4.1 does not compile with the lates glusterfs 3.4 on CentOs 6.4.
From what JM said, it builds against EL6 Samba (3.6) and it
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Guido De Rosa guido.der...@vemarsas.itwrote:
Apparently the problem isn't fixed... even when qemu doesn't crash, the
guest raises many I/O error and turns unusable, just like a real machine
would do if you physically remove the hard drive, I guess...
I'm
1 - 100 of 1024 matches
Mail list logo
