Hi John,
We haven't yet implemented any user/group quota's in glusterfs. But we have
a 'features/quota' translator, which implements a high level disk-usage
limit on export directory.
The codebase you saw was for 'errno' compatibility inbetween different OSes.
The user/group level quotas will
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:29:53 +0800, Kirby Zhou kirbyz...@sohu-rd.com
wrote:
I use RHEL-5.2
What's your point of the distribution? 'NO_CONTENT_TYPE' problem or FUSE
problem?
The FUSE rpm does not come with RHEL, it should come from somewhere I do
not know now.
I use RHEL5/CentOS5, too. I'm
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:37:24 +0800, Kirby Zhou kirbyz...@sohu-rd.com
wrote:
http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/AFR_single_process
So it means I cannot stop client / server role separately except I modify
the volume spec file?
I do not think it is acceptable for a productive environment.
I
Hi,
Noticed an odd thing with GlusterFS 2.x. It (as compared to 1.3.8) now
takes over a lot of privileged ports - and a lot of times, the ports stolen
aren't really 'free' for GlusterFS to be using.
For example, I run mail servers, and provide the usual access methods -
POP3, IMAP, and
Nicolas,
When you restart the server logs indicating EBADFD is fine, AFR will
try the operation on the other server. When you have the situation
where the glusterfs client hangs can you attach gdb to the glusterfs
and mail us the backtrace?
gdb -p pid of glusterfs
type bt at the gdb command
En/na Anand Avati ha escrit:
During several days i didn't pay attention to the gluster logs, as
everything worked fine. However, today i decided i was moving a file sized
500MB and the mount point got stale, i couln't access the data from that
particular client. The gluster itself didn't seem to
Without performance translator, the result is the same.
I'm trying with gdb as soon as possible.
you say, EBADFD is fine, AFR will try the operation on the other server , ok
so i understand, but it I test to stop this server, gluster can not retrieve
the first which is EBADFD.
A lot of my problem
Hello,
I added quotas on parent FS, but didn't get any effect. User can create
files of any size inside GlusterFS. I checked code and found:
./libglusterfs/src/compat-errno.c:
gf_error_to_errno_array[GF_ERROR_CODE_DQUOT] = EDQUOT;
./libglusterfs/src/compat-errno.c:
Hi,
Macro NO_CONTENT_TYPE is defined in httpd.h (apache-2.2). Are there any
stale installations of httpd.h (may be apache-1.3)? If so, please make sure
to remove them. If the problem still persists, can you try to build from
source tarball? Also please mail the configuration summary.
regards,
Hi,
How many protocol/client translators are you using? Can you mail the volume
specification file? glusterfs tries to bind to privileged ports which are
free. It cannot bind to ports which are already being used. No need to
change the value of CLIENT_PORT_CEILING, since if the client cannot bind
Thanks for pointing out the misspelled macro.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Raghavendra G raghaven...@zresearch.comwrote:
Hi,
How many protocol/client translators are you using? Can you mail the volume
specification file? glusterfs tries to bind to privileged ports which are
free. It
http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/AFR_single_process
So it means I cannot stop client / server role separately except I modify the
volume spec file?
I do not think it is acceptable for a productive environment.
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Kirby,
you can disable mod_glusterfs (since it is the one which is causing build
problem) using
rpm -ivh glusterfsversion.rpm --without modglfs
But please keep us informed about the queries which I asked, since it will
help us to fix the problem in mod_glusterfs.
regards,
On Tue, Feb 3,
Hi Raghu,
Apache 2.2.3 doesn't seem to have NO_CONTENT_TYPE macro. As i see only
2.2.8 has.
Regards
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Raghavendra G raghaven...@zresearch.comwrote:
Hi,
Macro NO_CONTENT_TYPE is defined in httpd.h (apache-2.2). Are there any
stale installations of httpd.h
not rpm -ivh
rpmbuild --ta glusterfs-2.0.0rc1.tar.gz --without modglfs with let you
compile glusterfs without mod_glusterfs.
Thanks
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Raghavendra G raghaven...@zresearch.comwrote:
Hi Kirby,
you can disable mod_glusterfs (since it is the one which is causing
Hi Paul,
Its in the plan.. will update you soon about the progress.
Regards,
Amar
2009/2/3 plr...@gmail.com
It would be better if the min-free-disk option would accept a number of
[MGTP]bytes. This would improve disk-usage efficiency in clusters with
widely varying disk sizes.
For example,
I am using glusterfs 1.3.12, afr + unify for my storage, I want to upgrade
it to 2.0.0rc1, any different between AFR+Unify and Distributed Replicated?
My storage will be scaled over 10T, which one do you suggest?
Thanks so much!
We suggest distribute+replicate as that will be the most
It would be better if the min-free-disk option would accept a number of
[MGTP]bytes. This would improve disk-usage efficiency in clusters with
widely varying disk sizes.
For example, I have a cluster with a 20GB drive and a 500GB drive. With
min-free-disk set to 2%, that leaves 400MB of free
Hi Kirby,
fix committed in glusterfs--mainline--3.0--patch-889.
regards,
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Harshavardhana har...@zresearch.comwrote:
not rpm -ivh
rpmbuild --ta glusterfs-2.0.0rc1.tar.gz --without modglfs with let you
compile glusterfs without mod_glusterfs.
Thanks
On
DHT does not have schedulers. Unify has.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Kirby Zhou kirbyz...@sohu-rd.com wrote:
Does scheduler still exists in DHT translator?
I cannot find that in the wiki
*From:* gluster-devel-bounces+kirbyzhou=sohu-rd@nongnu.org [mailto:
20 matches
Mail list logo
