Hello strk,
Tuesday, October 31, 2006, 5:05:00 PM, you wrote:
s BTW, rather then producing a .cpp file usin MovieTester
s for testing it, since we do have control on the sourcecode
s (you made it, right?) It will be simpler to make
s the SWF file a self-contained testcase instead.
s This would
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 11:33:02AM +0100, Udo Giacomozzi wrote:
Hello strk,
Tuesday, October 31, 2006, 5:05:00 PM, you wrote:
s BTW, rather then producing a .cpp file usin MovieTester
s for testing it, since we do have control on the sourcecode
s (you made it, right?) It will be simpler to
Markus Gothe wrote:
Seem that 0.7.2 is to be considered stable now... I think we should
release it on monday. Any other opinions/suggestions?
Considered stable or truly stable ? :-) I'd also like to see the
release go out within the next few days. Ideally we can now code freeze
the branch
strk wrote:
What do you mean by support this release ?
Luckily we're not in the enterprise support biz, or we'd have to
support every old release for many years. What I meant was whatever we
put out as an official release, alpha or not, is the version most
distributions ship. So we'll be
I've been playing with memory leaks a bit, now have a question for you.
We have a couple of create_movie() functions that take either an URL
or a tu_file *.
The one taking an URL will create a tu_file and invoke the other.
In both cases ownership of the tu_file used for reading determines
a
--- Rob Savoye [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
Markus Gothe wrote:
Seem that 0.7.2 is to be considered stable now... I think we should
release it on monday. Any other opinions/suggestions?
Considered stable or truly stable ? :-) I'd also like to see the
release go out within the next few
Congratulations, everybody, on stabilizing this release candidate.
I'd prefer to
keep developing in CVS, and then just make a new release a 0.7.3 branch
when we get video stabilized to the point it works for YouTube, Google,
or Lulu.tv.
7 matches
Mail list logo
