Re: Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] unsinged: enumeral type?

2006-11-05 Thread Martin Guy
Isn't the compiler referenceing the expression, not the return? Because path_cmd_move_to is a enum and m_cmd is not? Yes. the compiler may implement enums as unsigned [int] or it may choose a smaller type if it wishes. It could use bitfields if it wanted. If you know that the path_cmd_move_to

Re: [Gnash-dev] what is 'klash' ?

2006-11-05 Thread Martin Guy
Do you mean that libgnashgui.so can currently have support for multiple GUIs ? The library should be able to hold support for multiple GUIs. My experience was that if you build for one gui, install and then build for a different gui, the new shared library breaks the old executable. If

Re: [Gnash-dev] gui wants redraw

2006-11-05 Thread Martin Guy
wheter the Gui wants redraw on next frame: The problem with that, in my opinion, is that gui events should trigger *immediate* redraw, not redraw on next frame. Examples of redraw needs are: 1) resize 2) expose We don't want to wait for next frame before refreshing the view,

Re: Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] invalidated bounds interfaces

2006-11-05 Thread Martin Guy
Oh dear, I do not even want to know how much errors Gnash will find in real-world movie files... ;) Lots. But it is an explicit design feature of flash player that it never pops up error message boxes or barfs on bad rubbish, but always carries on with the movie... unless the error is so

[Gnash-dev] ActionScript errors (was: invalidated bounds interfaces)

2006-11-05 Thread strk
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:40:24AM +, Martin Guy wrote: Oh dear, I do not even want to know how much errors Gnash will find in real-world movie files... ;) Lots. But it is an explicit design feature of flash player that it never pops up error message boxes or barfs on bad rubbish, but

Re: [Gnash-dev] what is 'klash' ?

2006-11-05 Thread strk
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 10:55:45AM +, Martin Guy wrote: If we plan to allow for multiple GUIs in libgnashgui (and libgnashplayer) we should change the --enable-gui switch to accept a comma-separated list of guis, and update interface of Player to allow setting a specific GUI for use.

Re: [Gnash-dev] Releasing 0.7.2 RSN (i.e. on monday)...

2006-11-05 Thread Rob Savoye
John Gilmore wrote: By the time Gnash plays videos from the top sites, as well as lots of SWF's from other places, it'll be time to stop calling it version 0.something.something and call it 0.9 or 1.0. There's little sense in three- and four-digit release numbers here. I guess my own

Re: [Gnash-dev] unsinged: enumeral type?

2006-11-05 Thread strk
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 06:30:50PM +0100, Udo Giacomozzi wrote: Hello Martin, Sunday, November 5, 2006, 11:46:56 AM, you wrote: MG If you know that the path_cmd_move_to value is an enum that only MG takes positive values (it will if no explicit values are given for the MG enum values) and

Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] gui wants redraw

2006-11-05 Thread Udo Giacomozzi
Hello Martin, Sunday, November 5, 2006, 12:23:17 PM, you wrote: MG Yes. That way, when the user can pause the film, the window won't stop MG updating itself. Again, the inter-frame timer is individually implemented in the GUI itself meaning that they have to trigger redraw. I'd simply add a

[Gnash-dev] Re: ActionScript errors (was: invalidated bounds interfaces)

2006-11-05 Thread Udo Giacomozzi
Hello strk, Sunday, November 5, 2006, 1:08:05 PM, you wrote: s I see printing such warnings as a feature, I'm sure many flash coders s would agree on this. Yes, we need to only print such warnings when s using -v, and maybe use a special tag for it ('WARNING' so far are s usually used for SWF

Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: ActionScript errors

2006-11-05 Thread Udo Giacomozzi
Hello Rob, Sunday, November 5, 2006, 4:57:59 PM, you wrote: RS With framebuffer based devices, I think it's highly likely they'll be RS only running one Flash movie all the time, so you wouldn't be getting RS any warnings. With framebuffer based devices you don't want *any* messages to be

Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] unsinged: enumeral type?

2006-11-05 Thread Udo Giacomozzi
Hello strk, Sunday, November 5, 2006, 6:40:02 PM, you wrote: s Just sending the warnings to AGG authors would be good enough. s (yeah, understood he will probably not react to it) In the last few days lots of patch suggestions were sent to the AGG mailing list, but no vital sign at all from

Re: [Gnash-dev] head in really bad shape

2006-11-05 Thread strk
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:12:12AM +, Martin Guy wrote: I envision a situation in which on each bug report we'd respond with did you try with the head branch ? Having an explicit version field in the bug tracker would help (0.7.1/0.7.2/cvs, where cvs assumes that it is the cvs version of

Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: ActionScript errors

2006-11-05 Thread Martin Guy
letting users know there are bugs in their code is always a good thing. By users I mean people watching flash movies written by people they have never met. Letting flash authors know, yes. How about Gnash automatically mailing any Flash syntax errors to the author of the flash movie being

Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: ActionScript errors

2006-11-05 Thread strk
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 06:42:52PM +, Martin Guy wrote: How about Gnash automatically mailing any Flash syntax errors to the author of the flash movie being played? :D :D Speaking of which... SWF8 introduced a metadata tag ;) --strk; ___

Re: [Gnash-dev] Releasing 0.7.2 RSN (i.e. on monday)...

2006-11-05 Thread strk
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 09:11:36AM -0700, Rob Savoye wrote: Markus Gothe wrote: Seem that 0.7.2 is to be considered stable now... I think we should release it on monday. Any other opinions/suggestions? Considered stable or truly stable ? :-) I'd also like to see the release go out

[Gnash-dev] Re: WARNING: add_bitmap called with bi=NULL

2006-11-05 Thread Udo Giacomozzi
Hello strk, Sunday, November 5, 2006, 11:01:11 PM, you wrote: s Udo, in render_handler_agg_style.cpp (line 305): s (add_bitmap method) s // NOTE: Apparently bi can be NULL in some cases and this should not s // be treated as an error. s log_msg(WARNING: add_bitmap

Re: [Gnash-dev] Releasing 0.7.2 RSN (i.e. on monday)...

2006-11-05 Thread Rob Savoye
strk wrote: I've tried to higher severity of bugs that should be show stoppers for 0.7.2 and I ask you to do the same. Brows the current bugs database and set to Blocker any item that you think should block 0.7.2. At this point I'd say a blocker is anything that causes a core dump.