Re: [Gnash-dev] oprofile difficulties, easy access to debuginfo, and other thoughts

2009-10-14 Thread Rob Savoye
On 10/13/09 23:39, Kevin Kofler wrote: On Wednesday 14 October 2009, Rob Savoye wrote: Is the Gstreamer packages standard now, We build Gnash against GStreamer in Fedora, for the usual patent reasons. (GStreamer's modular architecture allows adding the patent-encumbered codecs from

Re: [Gnash-dev] oprofile difficulties, easy access to debuginfo, and other thoughts

2009-10-14 Thread Rob Savoye
On 10/12/09 18:30, Michael Stone wrote: Lastly, if there's a simple solution out there or reason why our approach was doomed from the start, then I'd also appreciate it if you could link to it a little bit more prominently from your wiki since Google doesn't seem to know anything about it.

Re: [Gnash-dev] oprofile difficulties, easy access to debuginfo, and other thoughts

2009-10-14 Thread Bernie Innocenti
El Tue, 13-10-2009 a las 22:57 -0600, Rob Savoye escribió: Called from where ? We couldn't find out, because symbols availability is a pre-requisite for dumping the call graphs. I don't have oprofile setup on my other Fedora 11 machine. It's amazingly simple these days: just install the

Re: [Gnash-dev] oprofile difficulties, easy access to debuginfo, and other thoughts

2009-10-14 Thread Rob Savoye
On 10/14/09 14:40, Bernie Innocenti wrote: It's amazingly simple these days: just install the oprofile-gui rpm and then run sudo oprof_start. Of course you also need to install the kernel-debuginfo and gnash-debuginfo. You probably also want glib-debuginfo and gtk-debuginfo. Can I do this my

[Gnash-dev] Technical thing

2009-10-14 Thread John Snowden
Hello Reverse engineers, I have watched your video on youtube [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3s-mG5yUjY] and I appreciate your great work. There's only one thing that I would like to mention and I hope you will not be mad at me for writing to you. You focus on reverse engeneering and do it

Re: [Gnash-dev] Technical thing

2009-10-14 Thread Rob Savoye
On 10/14/09 04:40, John Snowden wrote: something so you end up with nothing- wouldn't it be better if online video was anything like png or jpg or giff? This would solve all the problems, I wouldn't care more. Talk to the content producers to use free codecs. Gnash only handles the formats