Re: [Gnash-dev] Pledge for Gnash funding of AVM2 development

2010-10-20 Thread Ashley Reid
I would gladly take part, but is 1000$ really enough? What is the actual cost estimate? I would imagine something around the 5000$ mark? Thanks, Ash On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.comwrote: I believe AVM2 support in Gnash is vital to the continued progress of

Re: [Gnash-dev] Pledge for Gnash funding of AVM2 development

2010-10-20 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Ashley Reid] I would gladly take part, but is 1000$ really enough? What is the actual cost estimate? I would imagine something around the 5000$ mark? I intended (and actually also inserted) 50 to be the limit and not 10, but after moving back and forth in the pledgebank web gui for a while my

Re: [Gnash-dev] Pledge for Gnash funding of AVM2 development

2010-10-20 Thread strk
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 05:01:46PM +0200, Alessandro Pignotti wrote: I've not any money to offer, but I'd like to invite all the devs to take a look at lightspark code and join our efforts. Alessandro, I'm very happy to know things are going well with LS. I'd love to see an integration of its

Re: [Gnash-dev] Pledge for Gnash funding of AVM2 development

2010-10-20 Thread Alessandro Pignotti
On Wednesday 20 October 2010 17:14:40 you wrote: Based on prior discussion, I see two problems with using LightSpark, although that would be the preferable solution. One is that only supports OpenGL, and the other is it uses LLVM. This leaves LightSpark as a mainly desktop application. Me,

Re: [Gnash-dev] Pledge for Gnash funding of AVM2 development

2010-10-20 Thread Rob Savoye
On 10/20/10 09:21, Alessandro Pignotti wrote: I'd like to note that with the new graphics engine OpenGL is only used to do accelerated copy to VRAM and composited blitting, so it could be possible to use others backends that offers the same level of functionality. Only used is still a

Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash 0.8.8 Released!

2010-10-20 Thread Richard Wilbur
When I added the getgnash.org package repository to 3 Ubuntu 10.04 machines and upgraded to v0.8.8, the package repository had an updated mozilla plugin so it worked out of the box. That was a thoughtful touch, and made the new version simple to deploy. I am enjoying the new version, I am

Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash 0.8.8 Released!

2010-10-20 Thread Richard Wilbur
I poked around on getgnash.org and found the answer to my question--and a bug/change needed. The facts as I understand them: 1. mozilla-plugin-gnash was the name of the old mozilla plugin package up to v0.8.8 2. browser-plugin-gnash seems to be the name of the new mozilla plugin package