[Gnash-dev] Upgrade tree.hh to latest version?

2014-01-16 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
At the moment libbase/tree.hh is version 2.65 dated 2009-04-03, while the latest version of that library is verion 2.81 dated 2011-08-23. I suggest we upgrade if it do not cause any new testsuite errors, to ensure we have the latest fixes and the correct upstream URL in the file. The new

Re: [Gnash-dev] Upgrade tree.hh to latest version?

2014-01-16 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Petter Reinholdtsen] Any objections? My test build did not show any new testsuite tests. This is the complete changelog since our version 2.65. The first two seem relevant for us, while the others are unlikely to give us anything we need. :) 2011-08-23 Kasper Peeters

Re: [Gnash-dev] Upgrade tree.hh to latest version?

2014-01-16 Thread Sandro Santilli
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:27:28PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: My test build did not show any new testsuite tests. Upgrade of tree.hh from 2.65 to 2.81 is ok with me. Thanks for the effort. --strk; ___ Gnash-dev mailing list Gnash-dev@gnu.org

[Gnash-dev] Revert the subshape change until regressions are fixed? (Was: What is left do to o before a new release can be made?)

2014-01-16 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Cc to Bastiaan Jacques, to make sure the author of the subshape changes are aware of my proposal to revert the change until it is no longer introducing regressions. [Petter Reinholdtsen 2014-01-10] I had a look at http://sv.gnu.org/bugs/?40315 and the comments there, and the indication that the

Re: [Gnash-dev] Revert the subshape change until regressions are fixed?

2014-01-16 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Gah, trying again, this time with the CC still in place. It was lost in editing by mistake. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 01:30:19PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Cc to Bastiaan Jacques, to make sure the author of the subshape changes are aware of my proposal to revert the change until it is no

Re: [Gnash-dev] Revert the subshape change until regressions are fixed? (Was: What is left do to o before a new release can be made?)

2014-01-16 Thread Bastiaan Jacques
I have no particular opinion either way. I will fix the regressions before the release, but if others are happier with the changes backed out until the fix is available, that's fine by me. Bastiaan On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Bastiaan, the subshape changes introduced crash

Re: [Gnash-dev] Revert the subshape change until regressions are fixed? (Was: What is left do to o before a new release can be made?)

2014-01-16 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Bastiaan Jacques] I have no particular opinion either way. I will fix the regressions before the release, but if others are happier with the changes backed out until the fix is available, that's fine by me. Great to hear. When do you plan to look at it? If it isn't very soon, I believe it

[Gnash-dev] Time limit on fixing regressoins in the CommitRules?

2014-01-16 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
The current set of commit rules, URL: http://wiki.gnashdev.org/CommitRules , state as rule 3 that Commits shall not be reverted except as a last resort, which in general seem like a good idea to bring the project forward. But the introduction of a regression last June, and the bugs #39989