Hi,
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 09:18:14AM +0100, Sandro Santilli wrote:
If there's a release goal, that goal blocks a release too.
To be honest, I don't think explicit release goals are a good idea in
general. New releases should happen as soon an there are any major
feature improvements. (And no
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 02:57:51AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:01:44PM +0100, Benjamin Wolsey wrote:
In the last two weeks we've closed 29 bugs (at time of writing), 14 of
them serious enough to be considered release blockers: that is bugs
that
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 04:56:57PM -0800, John Gilmore wrote:
It starts burning 100% of one CPU
core while Youtube idly shows possible future video titles to click on.
This may be:
CPU busied in low-bandwidth situation
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?32586
I dubt that's the cause,
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:01:44PM +0100, Benjamin Wolsey wrote:
In the last two weeks we've closed 29 bugs (at time of writing), 14 of
them serious enough to be considered release blockers: that is bugs
that cause an abort, a segfault, or an illegal memory access.
I don't think that
In the last two weeks we've closed 29 bugs (at time of writing), 14 of
them serious enough to be considered release blockers: that is bugs that
cause an abort, a segfault, or an illegal memory access.
All fixed bugs: http://ur1.ca/3dgde
Including fixed blockers: http://ur1.ca/3dge1
Most of the
In the last two weeks we've closed 29 bugs (at time of writing), 14 of
them serious enough to be considered release blockers: that is bugs that
cause an abort, a segfault, or an illegal memory access.
That's really great!
All fixed bugs: http://ur1.ca/3dgde
I looked in that set of bugs for
On 03/02/11 12:01, Benjamin Wolsey wrote:
0.8.7, most had never been passed upstream until Hicham Haouari, the new
Gnash package maintainer for Fedora, got to work on them two weeks ago.
Bastiaan Jacques also triaged those bugs for the Gnash bug tracker, as
well as fixing many of them
7 matches
Mail list logo
