On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 04:58:45AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:48:16AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote:
In master, we need to do something to make this work correctly, and I
think forcing everyone to clone swfdec is not a good idea. At least
not the way
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 04:58:45AM +0100, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
Perhaps it would be best to host the (trimmed) swfdec testsuite in a
distinct repo, and include it as a Git submodule?
I'd favor this one.
Best if
On 03/15/11 11:41, Sandro Santilli wrote:
What's the exact goal ?
Right now the way we fetch the swfdec tests and it breaks all dist,
deb, and rpm targets in the Makefile if you don't have it already
cloned. It also breaks the tarball as well, since it doesn't have them
included.
I'm
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:48:16AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote:
In master, we need to do something to make this work correctly, and I
think forcing everyone to clone swfdec is not a good idea. At least
not the way it works now.
Perhaps it would be best to host the (trimmed) swfdec testsuite
4 matches
Mail list logo
