[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try this:
http://www.pcwd.de/
Thank you. That site has a driver that's apparently
descended from (and been worked on much more recently than)
the pcwd.c in the kernel sources - it has /proc support,
for example. I wonder why it hasn't been merged in?
Have you used
Here's the update on how this all went-
I received an enormous amount of help
both on and off the list and got to the point where
I at least knew exactly what I needed.
There was nothing I could do without knowing the
SMDR format. Sadly, the people who handed out
the problem could not provide
I know that most everyone here has likely already read the Slashdot
story posted on Friday(?), but this page is filled with some really
juicy quotes. Methinks that MS has stubbed their toe, and that
Windows(tm) will shortly be a thing of the past:
http://www.net2.com/lindows/
-Ken
Wow, since I posted this I have been deludged with
responses with personal experiences, links, and even
a great pdf on the subject!
The most useful responses have talked about the process
itself, some of the pitfalls, etc. It's clear to me that converting
to linux does not need to be (and
That's just a bump on the log. Microsoft will encounter more competition
and may lose some market share to Linux and BSD, but I don't think that
their dominance of the industry will be diminished short of a major anti-
trust breakup.
On 18 Mar 2002 at 9:13, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
I know that
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Jerry Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's just a bump on the log. Microsoft will encounter more competition
and may lose some market share to Linux and BSD, but I don't think that
their dominance of the industry will be diminished short of a major anti-
trust
Over the weekend I noticed that the Lithium-ion battery in my laptop is
apparently failing. I used to get 2+ hours running the laptop on battery and
suddenly I notice that the battery is charging more quickly than expected and
correspondingly only running for 20-30 minutes on battery. The system
I have two Linux platforms. The server has two NICs and is the firewall
and NAT. The other is on the inside. My question is this:
I have dhcpcd set up so that it will not overwrite the resolve.conf on the
server. But conceivably, RCN is allowed to change the nameserver I use
every time a
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 09:52, Jerry Feldman wrote:
That's just a bump on the log. Microsoft will encounter more competition
and may lose some market share to Linux and BSD, but I don't think that
their dominance of the industry will be diminished short of a major anti-
trust breakup.
I
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 10:21, Steven W. Orr wrote:
I have two Linux platforms. The server has two NICs and is the firewall
and NAT. The other is on the inside. My question is this:
I am *not* running a nameserver since I am a dhcp client.
Truth be told, I'd say that that's a great argument
In a message dated: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:18:07 EST
Alex Hewitt USG said:
I'm expecting to buy a replacement battery (not cheap) and was wondering if
there's a better way to extend the life of the battery? I think perhaps a bett
er strategy for extended battery life might be to run off AC most of
FYI - I suggested to Alex privately that he might consider doing
several deep-cycle discharges and recharges. However, this might not
work for Lithium-Ion batteries the way they used to for some early
Ni-Cd batteries that we use in the two-way radio market.
Paul Lussier asked:
They are
In a message dated: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:21:28 EST
Steven W. Orr said:
I have dhcpcd set up so that it will not overwrite the resolve.conf on the
server. But conceivably, RCN is allowed to change the nameserver I use
every time a lease gets started. What I have been doing is to set the
On Sun, 2002-03-17 at 21:52, Tom Buskey wrote:
Now if I could find a free NFS client for XP/2k/98 I'd be all set.
It's called Samba. ;-) Seriously, though -- I've dealt with a lot of
NFS clients for Windows (primarily Sun's PC-NFS (Pro) a/k/a Solstice,
but others, as well), and they all
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
It appears that ATT has finally done away with the 'mediaone.net'
domain, and now, e-mails to the GNHLUG list are bouncing to any
'@mediaone.net' address.
Could also do a s/mediaone.net/attbi.com/ in the list file.
This is the change
In a message dated: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:18:06 EST
mike ledoux said:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 08:10:11AM -0800, Karl J. Runge wrote:
It appears that ATT has finally done away with the 'mediaone.net'
domain, and now, e-mails to the GNHLUG list are bouncing to any
'@mediaone.net' address.
Karl J. Runge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Could also do a s/mediaone.net/attbi.com/ in the list file.
This is the change that ATT Broadband Internet (attbi) did.
NO!! There was NOT necessarily a 1:1 change made - there were some
username conflicts whereby the former mediaone.net customers had to
Actually, I think that Microsoft's claim to Windows is a bit weak since
they were not the first to use the term to describe GUI, and windows is a
generic term.
On 18 Mar 2002 at 7:14, Karl J. Runge wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Jerry Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's just a bump on
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Bayard Coolidge USG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Karl J. Runge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Could also do a s/mediaone.net/attbi.com/ in the list file.
This is the change that ATT Broadband Internet (attbi) did.
NO!! There was NOT necessarily a 1:1 change made - there were
No, this is a bad idea since many former mediaone.net users had to change
their user ids. In the case of those who changed user ids, by doing a
change, you will be sending gnhlug email to someone (probably a former
@home user) else.
On 18 Mar 2002 at 8:10, Karl J. Runge wrote:
Could also
I've been pestering Mr. Gelinas about this privately
for some time and no, we cannot simply substitute
attbi.com for mediaone.net because a 1:1 mapping was
not possible due to duplicates in the two domains.
Any ATT customer who hasn't taken responsibility for
effecting the necessary changes by
Quite a while ago I explored this entire issue. It is much better to use
Samba (and smbfs) to mount Windows shares one Linux/Unix systems (and
conversely mount exported Linux/Unix shares) on Windows platforms.
For one thing, Samba is included in virtually every Linux distro with SMBFS
as a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 10:21:28AM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote:
I have dhcpcd set up so that it will not overwrite the resolve.conf on the
server. But conceivably, RCN is allowed to change the nameserver I use
every time a lease gets started.
IMO,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 08:10:11AM -0800, Karl J. Runge wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
It appears that ATT has finally done away with the 'mediaone.net'
domain, and now, e-mails to the GNHLUG list are
At 11:19 AM 3/18/2002 -0500, Jerry Feldman wrote:
Actually, I think that Microsoft's claim to Windows is a bit weak since
they were not the first to use the term to describe GUI, and windows is a
generic term.
Darn Tootin'.
Remember using Windows on SUN boxes before any MS Win existed ?
All,
There has been some concern about the changeover of addresses from
mediaone.net to attbi.com and how it affected the list. The cutover
deadline for subscribers was this past Friday. This morning I removed
the remainder of addresses. Several subscribers existed under both old
and new
It seems that SUN maybe the first major UNIXen company whose business
will be significantly curtailed by the emergence of Linux.
I thought SCO already grabbed that title.
-Andy
*
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
Michael O'Donnell wrote:
I've been pestering Mr. Gelinas about this privately
for some time and no, we cannot simply substitute
attbi.com for mediaone.net because a 1:1 mapping was
not possible due to duplicates in the two domains.
Any ATT customer who hasn't taken responsibility for
At 11:42 AM 3/18/2002 -0500, Andrew W. Gaunt wrote:
jkinz wrote:
It seems that SUN maybe the first major UNIXen company whose business
will be significantly curtailed by the emergence of Linux.
I thought SCO already grabbed that title.
-Andy
Yes. True. I should say SUN may be the next one
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said (as his Humble Opinion):
Of course I never considered SCO to be a major UNIXen company
even though they used to ship more licenses than anybody else.
I had the same impression during the timeframe that Compaq bought
out Digital; I was working for Digital at the time in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 11:42 AM 3/18/2002 -0500, Andrew W. Gaunt wrote:
jkinz wrote:
It seems that SUN maybe the first major UNIXen company whose business
will be significantly curtailed by the emergence of Linux.
I thought SCO already grabbed that title.
Did SCO
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 14:05, Derek D. Martin wrote:
jkinz wrote:
It seems that SUN maybe the first major UNIXen company whose business
will be significantly curtailed by the emergence of Linux.
I thought SCO already grabbed that title.
Did SCO ever count as a major Unix company?
Good afternoon all,
I'm setting up a Samba server and I want to configure SWAT. Documentation
says to modify your /etc/inetd.conf file so the swat service will start but
I don't have a /etc/inetd.conf file. I'm running Linux 7.2 and Samba was
installed with the OS. Could someone point
This is very true indeed. ATT had to transition a great deal of accounts and there
are plenty of us who got left behind. Repeated emails to tech support, lots of time
spent on hold with customer support got me a lot of your account will be
transitioned soon responses, but no email account
At 01:25 PM 3/18/2002 -0500, Bayard Coolidge USG wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said (as his Humble Opinion):
Of course I never considered SCO to be a major UNIXen company
even though they used to ship more licenses than anybody else.
I had the same impression during the timeframe that Compaq
I believe that RH 7.0 and above use xinetd instead of inetd, so you will
have to use that config file.
FYI,
Kenny
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 14:28, Robert Casey wrote:
Good afternoon all,
I'm setting up a Samba server and I want to configure SWAT. Documentation
says to modify your
In a message dated: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 14:28:02 EST
Robert Casey said:
Good afternoon all,
I'm setting up a Samba server and I want to configure SWAT. Documentation
says to modify your /etc/inetd.conf file so the swat service will start but
I don't have a /etc/inetd.conf file. I'm running Linux
Michael Costolo said:
Fortunately I try to avoid using ISP email accounts. I've changed ISPs too ma
ny
times and know how hard it is to get everyone to update their address books th
at I
just give out my Yahoo! address making life simpler.
-Mike-
I've been using netaddress.net/usa.net for a
In a message dated: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:21:35 EST
Tom Buskey said:
Does Yahoo have POP? Anyone know of a free, long term, POPable, web
enabled email site?
Ayup! I've been using yahoo for a while now. And, supposedly, you
can relay off their servers for outgoing too, provided you enable
In order to use Yahoo's smtp, you need to be a member of Yahoo
Deliveries, which I believe is free. The URL with the instructions is:
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/pop/pop-04.html.
C-Ya,
Kenny
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 17:26, Paul Lussier wrote:
In a message dated: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:21:35
In a message dated: 18 Mar 2002 17:39:20 EST
Kenneth E. Lussier said:
In order to use Yahoo's smtp, you need to be a member of Yahoo
Deliveries, which I believe is free.
Errr, what's Yahoo! Deliveries?
The URL with the instructions is:
http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/mail/pop/pop-04.html.
Now
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, at 9:34am, Kenny Donahue wrote:
Can anyone point me towards a good reference for linux admin information?
I second (third? fourth?) the pointers to the LDP, and the recommendation
for _USAH_.
_Essential System Administration_, by AEleen Frisch, published by
O'Reilly,
On 10 Mar 2002, at 2:40pm, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
While I have no problem with compiling the proprietary 3Ware module into
my 2.4 kernel, I was wondering if anyone knows of any way to get the
management software (3dmd) to work with the stock kernel code.
Hmmm, I dunno about 2.4, but on 2.2,
Paul Lussier wrote:
In a message dated: 18 Mar 2002 17:39:20 EST
Kenneth E. Lussier said:
In order to use Yahoo's smtp, you need to be a member of Yahoo
Deliveries, which I believe is free.
Errr, what's Yahoo! Deliveries?
Yahoo! Deliveries is basically an opt-in spam service. If you
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, at 2:30pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So does SCO plan to become the Linux alternative, giving away licenses
and selling support ? Might work, but they will have a much smaller
development team. :-)
SCO has got to be one of the most clunky commercial Unixes ever. Yah,
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, at 4:37pm, Martha Jo McCarthy wrote:
There is no sales dept at Union which makes things easier. We need AS/400
connectivity which looks like we are able to tweak out with tn5250. We
have several Access databases that we will convert to PostgreSQL. A Samba
file server
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, at 11:31am, Derek D. Martin wrote:
Please use the correct e-mail address when posting to the list. Some
e-mail clients have mailing list management features that don't work
properly if you post to an alternate address...
Changing your procmail recipe's match line to
*
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, at 10:50pm, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
When I pull up the pages in a browser via http, the pages are cached, and
I can do things such as export them to spreadsheets, etc. However, if I
pull the pages via https, the pages are cached, and therefore, I can't
export them.
I
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, at 8:05pm, mike ledoux wrote:
* ^TOgnhlug@.*zk3.dec.com
will solve this problem nicely. :-)
That would work, but it is a very bad idea.
Why is it a very bad idea? I could see still does not catch
everything, but very bad?
I am aware someone could spoof a message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, mike ledoux hath spake thusly:
is Derek's problem, which has to do with Mutt's 'List-Reply' feature.
What he really needs to do is change whatever goofy 'subscribe' line he
has for this list in his .muttrc to:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Benjamin Scott hath spake thusly:
The way that I solved this was to hack an alternate version of Red Hat's
/etc/init.d/network script, which looks for the config files in slightly
different places.
... booting into run
Starting with RH 7.0 they swapped to xinetd from inetd. Provided xinetd
itself is installed (rpm -q xinetd) you'll have a directory /etc/xinetd.d
in there will be a file named swat. Find this line:
disable = yes
and change it to
disable = no
(provided it didn't already say that of course),
52 matches
Mail list logo
