On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Karl J. Runge wrote:
I naively thought Errors-To: was the only way to do this. (I grepped and
saw this string in the majordomo code, but that was likely regarding
subscription, etc, activities, not posts)
A lot of software support(s|ed) the use of Errors-To, because at
I noticed my domainname would not resolve for most of the day and I got
got a whole bunch of mailer-daemon messages. I apologize to all who
received similar errors due to problems with my domain.
Have we had any discussion on the list on the policy of where errors
should be directed? We seem
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 8:47 PM
Subject: Mailer errors question
I noticed my domainname would not resolve for most of the day and I got
got a whole bunch of mailer-daemon messages. I apologize to all who
received similar errors due to problems with my domain
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Karl J. Runge wrote:
Have we had any discussion on the list on the policy of where errors
should be directed?
Yes. Several.
The problem is a political one, not a technical one. The situation is not
going to change. Yes, that is too bad.
I believe Steven Orr told
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is a political one, not a technical one. The situation is not
going to change. Yes, that is too bad.
:-(
Errors-To is non-standard and depreciated. The proper solution is to
set the SMTP envelope FROM address
