Re: Memory Cleaner

2000-02-09 Thread Kenneth E. Lussier
Aha! So I'm not going crazy (or if I am, at least this isn't proof of it!) I'll reserve judgement. You video problem could be because of the way you treat your monitor ;-) I've seen similar problems, only on my home machine. Running KDE, with GOBS and GOBS of memory (256MB), lots of

Re: Memory Cleaner

2000-02-08 Thread PK Whelan
Thanks Karl. That's good info. Paul W On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Karl J. Runge wrote: Hi Paul, I believe the standard philosophy is that if machine isn't utilizing (in some way) nearly 100% of the RAM then it is wasting the RAM. I agree with this for the most part. So it caches files,

Re: Memory Cleaner

2000-02-08 Thread Karl J. Runge
Hi Paul, I believe the standard philosophy is that if machine isn't utilizing (in some way) nearly 100% of the RAM then it is wasting the RAM. I agree with this for the most part. So it caches files, buffers i/o, and keeps other "slow" data in the RAM for quick access should the need for them

Re: Memory Cleaner

2000-02-08 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote: Right now, Top reports X as using 31.7% of my memory and 2.6% of my CPU. What's the Resident Segment Size of X? Not the Virtual Segment Size, mind you. I believe X maps the video controller into virtual memory, plus who knows what else, so VSS

Re: Memory Cleaner

2000-02-08 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote: If that doesn't work, you can try including "Magic SYSRQ Keys" into your kernel. So THAT'S what that is for I never did get around to reading the docs on that... Yup. I've become quite adept at killing X, resetting the keyboard,

Re: Memory Cleaner

2000-02-08 Thread Derek Martin
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote: I've been having the same problems ever since RH6.1. Right now, Top reports X as using 31.7% of my memory and 2.6% of my CPU. If I run a WM that is resource-intensive (such as KDE, Gnome, E, etc.), there have been a few occasioins where my whole