Re: Another name server needed for gnhlug.org

2000-05-11 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Wed, 10 May 2000 15:25:07 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: In a message dated 5/10/00 12:04:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Security will most likely consist of: - turning off all "r" services (actually commenting out everything in

Re: Another name server needed for gnhlug.org

2000-05-10 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Wed, 10 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Security will most likely consist of: - turning off all "r" services (actually commenting out everything in /etc/inetd.conf) Just a general sysadmin question: If everything in /etc/inetd.conf is going to be commented out, why run inetd at

Re: Another name server needed for gnhlug.org

2000-05-10 Thread Bobnhlinux
In a message dated 5/10/00 12:04:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Security will most likely consist of: - turning off all "r" services (actually commenting out everything in /etc/inetd.conf) Just a general sysadmin question: If everything in /etc/inetd.conf is

RE: Another name server needed for gnhlug.org

2000-05-10 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Jerry Eckert wrote: Just a general sysadmin question: If everything in /etc/inetd.conf is going to be commented out, why run inetd at all? Did anyone else not get the message Bob is replying to? It was originally posted to the gnhlug-org list; I assume Bob posted his

RE: Another name server needed for gnhlug.org

2000-05-10 Thread Jerry Eckert
Did anyone else not get the message Bob is replying to? Jerry -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 3:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Greater NH Linux Users' Group Subject: Re: Another name server