Karl J. Runge wrote:
Is it safe to say you do not want to run a 2nd instance of apache (with
a trimmed down config)? I.e. instead of just providing external
service on port 81, you also want to play around with new different
webservers?
Yeah, I tried a trimmed down version of apache and
In a message dated: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 09:39:43 EST
Andrew W. Gaunt said:
I'm looking for a light weight web server that I can run on port 81
of my linux box (Sparc Debian) at home and expose it to the Internet.
I've heard great things about Tiny HTTP (thttp). I don't have any
information
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 11:31, Andrew W. Gaunt wrote:
I wonder, is there a way to tell apache to use a different document root
depending on the port? That would be cool way for sorting it out.
You can use the virtual host container to set port, document root, etc.:
VirtualHost
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
There's also that web server someone wrote in postscript which runs
out of inetd, but I really don't think you want that ;)
I wonder how that would run on my printer.
--
---
Tom Buskey
Very cool, I will give that a try
One web server, many webs
-Andrew Gaunt
Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 11:31, Andrew W. Gaunt wrote:
I wonder, is there a way to tell apache to use a different document root
depending on the port? That would be cool way for sorting
At 11:47 AM 3/29/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 09:39:43 EST
Andrew W. Gaunt said:
I'm looking for a light weight web server that I can run on port 81
of my linux box (Sparc Debian) at home and expose it to the Internet.
I've heard great things about
Any except this one perhaps?
Syntax error on line 270 of /etc/apache/httpd.conf:
Listen cannot occur within VirtualHost section
Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 11:31, Andrew W. Gaunt wrote:
I wonder, is there a way to tell apache to use a different document root
depending on
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 12:30, Andrew W. Gaunt wrote:
Any except this one perhaps?
Syntax error on line 270 of /etc/apache/httpd.conf:
Listen cannot occur within VirtualHost section
That figures In your main config add a 'Listen xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:81'
directive, and then in the VH, bind the
No go, doesn't like the Listen directive in a virtual host container.
Oh well, if it was easy we all be out of work.
Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
On Fri, 2002-03-29 at 12:30, Andrew W. Gaunt wrote:
Any except this one perhaps?
Syntax error on line 270 of /etc/apache/httpd.conf:
Listen cannot
Got it, there is a solution. The reason it was not starting before
was because the log files could not be created. Amazing what
actually reading the error.logs will reveal.
This works:
#Port 80
Listen 192.168.168.3:80 # internal web, outside access blocked with
ipchains rules
Listen
Andrew W. Gaunt wrote:
Got it, there is a solution. The reason it was not starting before
was because the log files could not be created. Amazing what
actually reading the error.logs will reveal.
This works:
#Port 80
Listen 192.168.168.3:80 # internal web, outside access blocked
In a message dated: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:04:46 EDT
David Roberts said:
I'm not sure what virus it was (and this article has no details), but
anyone who downloaded files from M$ corporate support services could have
been infected...
As soon as the problem was reported, it was dealt with
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Jeffry Smith wrote:
I used to read InfoWorld at my last job ...
you must have missed there "Microsoft can do no wrong" period.
Possible. However, I tend to only read things that interest me. It is
entirely possible that I simply ignored or subconsciously filtered any
Benjamin Scott said:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Jeffry Smith wrote:
I used to read InfoWorld at my last job ...
you must have missed there "Microsoft can do no wrong" period.
Possible. However, I tend to only read things that interest me. It is
entirely possible that I simply ignored or
Benjamin Scott said:
If you absolutely have to pay money for your support, then see above and
below.
On the other hand, consider your non-traditional support options:
One thing I like to point out to people - in 1997, the Linux Community
(mailing lists, newsgroups, etc, not us paid
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Jeffry Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I like to point out to people - in 1997, the Linux Community
(mailing lists, newsgroups, etc, not us paid support companies (shameless plug
;-) won Inforworld's Support of the Year. This unpaid, volunteer community
Karl J. Runge said:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Jeffry Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I like to point out to people - in 1997, the Linux Community
(mailing lists, newsgroups, etc, not us paid support companies (shameless plug
;-) won Inforworld's Support of the Year. This
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Jeffry Smith wrote:
Recently, they seem to have lightened up on Linux OS. Maybe because IBM
(one of their major advertisers, MS being another one) is supporting it.
However, they still seem to take a lot of the "linuxgram" method - damning
with faint praise, reporting
Benjamin Scott said:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Jeffry Smith wrote:
Recently, they seem to have lightened up on Linux OS. Maybe because IBM
(one of their major advertisers, MS being another one) is supporting it.
However, they still seem to take a lot of the "linuxgram" method - damning
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Vince McHugh wrote:
I suppose that "commercial" was the wrong word. "Supported" may have been
more to the point.
Most of the commercial distro vendors (Red Hat, SuSE, Caldera, etc.) have
various types of support offerings, from installation to pay-per-incident to
would say that your Manager is
looking for
someone to point at when it fails or doesnt work, in
my case
"Me". Supporting Free Software is Somewhat a Virtual
Thing
ie. if i Build a web server for a Customer and they
want
tweaks or other options/Support, they would pay me
for
as
"Commercial" i would say that your Manager is looking for
someone to point at when it fails or doesnt work, in my case
"Me". Supporting Free Software is Somewhat a Virtual Thing
ie. if i Build a web server for a Customer and they want
tweaks or other options/Support, they woul
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just purchased Red Hat linux 6.2 in order to develop a web server using
Apache.
First off, please *DO NOT* send general messages to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list. That list, as its name implies, is for
announcements only. Use [EMAIL PROTECTED
I just purchased Red Hat linux 6.2 in order to develop a web server using
Apache. Are there any issues I should be aware of. I am considering
using an IBM Pentium 133 with 1.1 gig, as the server, but wonder if the
processor may be too slow or the hard drive too small for a SMALL intranet?
I'll
The Boston Linux group, http://www.blu.org is running on a Pentium 133. We
serve 4 user group web pages and about 30 majordomo lists.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just purchased Red Hat linux 6.2 in order to develop a web server using
Apache. Are there any issues I should be aware of. I am
Benjamin Scott wrote:
Apache rose to nearly 60% total web server market share, at 58.08%.
It's worth pointing out that those figures are for servers
that haven't customised the ident string. In actual fact,
Apache + derivatives is above 60%, closer to 65% I think.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar
)
Subject: Re: Apache web server standings
Benjamin Scott wrote:
Apache rose to nearly 60% total web server market share, at 58.08
of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/16/2000 06:03:50 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Jeffry Smith/CORP/HPHC)
Subject: Re: Apache web server standings
Benjamin Scott wrote:
Apache rose to nearly 60% total web server market
Rats, another talk on a subject I really want to learn that I had to miss.
Were
any slides / charts / papers used in the presentation? If so, any chance
of
them getting posted for those of us who have to miss talks (maybe to a
GNHLUG/SLUG/presentations directory on gnhlug.org, or under a
Dave,
I really opened my mouth this morning as I told Jeff that we had the
presentations up already. Sorry. Don't mean to add to your work load.
Also, please remove Brian Sullivan's name from contacts on the Contact
page. Also, can we add the SLUG site to the links page. www.slug.org., and
Hi all,
This was mentioned briefly at tonight's SLUG meeting (excellent presentation
on PHP, BTW), but this month's Netcraft Web Server Survey shows some very good
news for Apache and OSS fans in general.
Apache rose to nearly 60% total web server market share, at 58.08%.
Microsoft
31 matches
Mail list logo
