Re: supernetting ?

2000-04-09 Thread Benjamin Scott
On 4 Apr 2000, Adam Johnson wrote: Well, you'd have to set a similar route up on the Windows box as well, otherwise the packets will get there, but not return. Doh! I knew I was too tired to be trying network things when I wrote that. Yah, add the route on the 'doze box, and everything

Re: supernetting ?

2000-04-04 Thread Adam Johnson
--- Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For example, I've got two hosts on my ethernet LAN. One is a Windoze machine with address 192.168.10.5, the other is my Linux machine with 192.168.10.1 for the address. I can ping either box right now. But if I do the following: # ifconfig eth0

Re: supernetting ?

2000-04-04 Thread Jerry Feldman
On 4 Apr 2000, at 14:44, Adam Johnson wrote: --- Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For example, I've got two hosts on my ethernet LAN. One is a Windoze machine with address 192.168.10.5, the other is my Linux machine with 192.168.10.1 for the address. I can ping either box right

Re: supernetting ?

2000-04-03 Thread joe Carpentier
My comments are below your questions with *** : Original Message Follows From: Bill Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: supernetting ? Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 16:48:58 -0500 [Discussion of increasing past subnet size and the possibility that the address-wise

Re: supernetting ?

2000-04-02 Thread Adam Johnson
--- Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There needs to be a router (or should I be saying gateway) ... The terms "gateway" and "router" are pretty much synonymous for this application. When one talks of a "gateway", one usually means the specific router that connects your local subnet to

Re: supernetting ?

2000-04-02 Thread Benjamin Scott
On 2 Apr 2000, Adam Johnson wrote: Hmm, couldn't you configure a static route in each computer for the other subnet, so they all know that both subnets are on the same wire? I think a host needs to be configured with an address on a particular subnet in order to send or receive traffic on

supernetting ?

2000-03-31 Thread Christopher M. Downs
i have an internal class C running on a redhat 6.1 DHCP server, but im am almost out of address's, how do i get the super subnet going? anyone have any ideas? never done a supernet so im kinda wondering where to start. ** To unsubscribe

Re: supernetting ?

2000-03-31 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 14:43:39 EST "Christopher M. Downs" said: i have an internal class C running on a redhat 6.1 DHCP server, but im am almo st out of address's, how do i get the super subnet going? anyone have any idea s? never done a supernet so im kinda wondering where to

Re: supernetting ?

2000-03-31 Thread Ferenc Tamas Gyurcsan
I'm not sure what you're referring to wrt super-netting. Are you running with a private class C (192.168.X) subnet? If so, you could just add on another subnet. Since the orig question was from an .edu address, it can easily happen. So what I think you meant is that you had a C type of

Re: supernetting ?

2000-03-31 Thread Bill Freeman
[Discussion of increasing past subnet size and the possibility that the address-wise adjacent subnet isn't available, and that subnet masks must be continuous elided.] Can any of the truly IP.aware comment on the scheme below? IIUC, it is perfectly possible to have two separate