Derek Martin said his interest in x86 Assembly is academic.
Well, OK, I can sort of understand that, particularly if you might
be thinking of tinkering in the embedded market, or doing some
esoteric real-time stuff.
However, I'd strongly encourage looking more at what might be coming
up in
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Bayard Coolidge USG wrote:
Derek Martin said his interest in x86 Assembly is academic.
Well, OK, I can sort of understand that, particularly if you might be
thinking of tinkering in the embedded market, or doing some esoteric
real-time stuff.
An understanding of that
Not exactly what you were looking for, but since there haven't been lots
of alternatives suggested:
There is an x86 assembler written in GNU bash, by Rick Hohensee.
It's disadvantage for your purposes is that it has its own idiosyncratic
mneumonics. To get some idea about it, I suggest a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Benjamin Scott hath spake thusly:
[Warning: Long and only vaguely on-topic post ahead. Proceed with caution.]
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Derek D. Martin wrote:
Anyone know any good resources for x86 assembly in a Linux
- Original Message -
From: Bayard Coolidge USG [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: x86 Assembly resources
Derek Martin said his interest in x86 Assembly is academic.
Well, OK, I can sort of understand that, particularly
Bayard Coolidge USG [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, I'd strongly encourage looking more at what might be coming
up in Itanium, and rather than doing Assembly-level stuff, be looking
at what it REALLY takes to migrate existing C/C++ code to a 64-bit
environment. In a sense, it shouldn't
Derek D. Martin wrote:
I might also mention here that I'm NOT a complete newbie to assembly.
I've written some 6502 machine language BY HAND (i.e. poking the
opcodes into memory and calling them), ...
newbie.
if you weren't you'd know that writing assembly by hand involved setting the
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Lowell Bruce McCulley wrote:
if you weren't you'd know that writing assembly by hand involved setting
the console bit switches for each instruction and then hitting the
appropriate switch to deposit the binary code (usually 12 or 16 bits, in
my experience) into memory.
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Greater NH Linux Users' Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: x86 Assembly resources
You think maybe 16-bits was strong encryption when UNIVAC was
state-of-the-art
PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Derek D. Martin
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:12 PM
To: GNHLUG mailing list; BLU Users' Group
Subject: x86 Assembly resources
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone know any good resources for x86 assembly in a Linux
environment? Most of the stuff
Users' Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 2:12 PM
Subject: x86 Assembly resources
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone know any good resources for x86 assembly in a Linux
environment? Most of the stuff I've seen deals with MASM, which isn't
terribly useful
Good examples are hard to find. One approach is to write C
code and then have a peek at what GCC translates it into.
A trivial example might be a file called return1234plus.c
whose entire contents are this:
unsigned long int
return1234plus( unsigned long int more )
{
Been to linuxassembly.org you evil cross-poster?
ccb
*
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body.
http://linuxassembly.org/
They told me that gcc does inline assembly, which I didn't know.
Yikes!
GCC has supported inline assembler on some
platforms for a number of years now; the kernel
is littered with such sequences. Being good
at inline GCC assembly doesn't take much,
just
- Original Message -
From: Michael O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: x86 Assembly resources
http://linuxassembly.org/
They told me that gcc does inline assembly, which I didn't know.
Yikes!
GCC has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So that I don't have to answer the question a bunch of times
privately, I'll mention my interest in assembly.
There is no specific problem that I can't address with some other
language. I'm not trying to optimize the hell out of some piece of
code.
[Warning: Long and only vaguely on-topic post ahead. Proceed with caution.]
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Derek D. Martin wrote:
Anyone know any good resources for x86 assembly in a Linux environment?
Most of the stuff I've seen deals with MASM, which isn't terribly useful
to me.
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002,
17 matches
Mail list logo
