Re: Home Network

2000-03-21 Thread Rich Payne
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Michael P. Griffin wrote: Thank you all. You have given me enough to get started and based on equipment suggestions a rough idea of cost. I will get back to you with more specific questions after I have pulled the wire and start to configure the system. One last

Re: Home Network

2000-03-21 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 07:05:28 EST Rich Payne said: Let me put it this way...unless you have very deep pockets the limiting factor will be your connection to the internet, not your routing box. Last I heard a 486 could confortable route a T1 line w/o any trouble. Absolutely,

Re: Home Network

2000-03-21 Thread Rich Payne
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Paul Lussier wrote: In a message dated: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 07:05:28 EST Rich Payne said: Let me put it this way...unless you have very deep pockets the limiting factor will be your connection to the internet, not your routing box. Last I heard a 486 could confortable

Re: Home Network

2000-03-21 Thread Karl J. Runge
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Rich Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, Paul raises a good point here that I should have touched upon. Do not run anything on that system that it doesn't need, this includes: Any of the r programs (rsh, rexec, etc) (edit your /etc/ietd.conf) Anything to do with

Re: Home Network

2000-03-21 Thread Rich Payne
Yup, FWIW I actually run IMAP on my firewall box, however I've told ipchains not to allow any external connections on that port. So Imap/pop are usuable inside the house, but nobody on the outside can get to them. Of course the next step is to run a log checker then you get to see all the people

Re: Home Network

2000-03-21 Thread Karl J. Runge
Hi Rich, On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, Rich Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yup, FWIW I actually run IMAP on my firewall box, however I've told ipchains not to allow any external connections on that port. So Imap/pop are usuable inside the house, but nobody on the outside can get to them. Yes, I do

IPCHAINS/RealServer question

2000-03-21 Thread kenlussier
All, Does anyone know if "-p all" in an ipchains rule actually means ALL protocols, or does it only include tcp, udp, and icmp? I got the realAudio server for RedHat, and I am trying to set it up on my webserver, but the webserver is behind a firewall. I need to redirect the ports to the

Re: Home Network

2000-03-21 Thread Jeffry_Smith
I haven't (yet) set up a linux firewall, but when I was doing CISCOs, doing security, the basic rules of setup was: 1. never run anything except the firewall software on the firewall 2. First, deny EVERYTHING. This enables you to have the default rule of nothing, and confirm you've turned

FW: Linux Informix

2000-03-21 Thread Lori Hitchcock
-Original Message- From: Yndigos [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Linux Informix Hye, I wanted to know a minimum config to run Informix-SE on a Linux Server (Red Hat 5.2 or earlier version). I mean CPU, RAM and

Re: IPCHAINS/RealServer question

2000-03-21 Thread Derek Martin
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, Does anyone know if "-p all" in an ipchains rule actually means ALL protocols, or does it only include tcp, udp, and icmp? I got the realAudio server for RedHat, and I am trying to set it up on my webserver, but the webserver is behind

FTP ? ls more than the screen can hold

2000-03-21 Thread csmith
I have ftp` ed into a site from the linux command line and have issued the ls command, but I have 3 to 4 screens full of files, needless to say I can't read them as they go by, and I can't pipe it to more or less and the commands I issue to save it`s output to a file don't work. How can I read

Re: FTP ? ls more than the screen can hold

2000-03-21 Thread Rich Payne
ls -al . |more --rdp On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, csmith wrote: I have ftp` ed into a site from the linux command line and have issued the ls command, but I have 3 to 4 screens full of files, needless to say I can't read them as they go by, and I can't pipe it to more or less and the commands I

Re: FTP ? ls more than the screen can hold

2000-03-21 Thread Karl J. Runge
On Tue, 21 Mar 2000, csmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have ftp` ed into a site from the linux command line and have issued the ls command, but I have 3 to 4 screens full of files, needless to say I can't read them as they go by, and I can't pipe it to more or less and the commands I issue

Re: FTP ? ls more than the screen can hold

2000-03-21 Thread Kevin D. Clark
csmith writes: I have ftp` ed into a site from the linux command line and have issued the ls command, but I have 3 to 4 screens full of files, needless to say I can't read them as they go by, and I can't pipe it to more or less and the commands I issue to save it`s output to a file don't

Re: FTP ? ls more than the screen can hold

2000-03-21 Thread Kevin D. Clark
Karl J. Runge writes: (except to note the *file* listing trick: "get README |more" with no space between | and more) Sometimes this is useful as well: get README - Especially if you can read fast. (-: But this doesn't solve the original poster's problem. --kevin -- Kevin D.

Useable Windoze telnet clients (Was: RE: FTP ? ls more than the screen can hold)

2000-03-21 Thread Jeff Schreiber
"Jerry Eckert" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now, if only there were something equivalent for the MS-DOS or Telnet windows under Win-doze 98... The very first thing I always do when first sitting down at a Micros**t Windoze box is go straight to www.shareware.com and download qvtnet, or

Re: Home Network

2000-03-21 Thread Greg Kettmann
Hmmm, not to rain on your parade but my usual recomendation is to buy something like a Linksys BEFSR41.http://www.linksys.com/scripts/features.asp?part=BEFSR41 It's a 4 port switch with a firewall and DHCP server designed to share a cablemodem or DSL connection through a house. It's $169

Re: Useable Windoze telnet clients (Was: RE: FTP ? ls more than thescreen can hold)

2000-03-21 Thread Jerry Callen
Jeff Schreiber wrote: The very first thing I always do when first sitting down at a Micros**t Windoze box is go straight to www.shareware.com and download qvtnet, or winqvt so that there is a telnet client that I can actually use. I've used it since my C-Tron days, and it's

RE: FTP ? ls more than the screen can hold

2000-03-21 Thread Jerry Feldman
WS_FTP. On 21 Mar 00, at 16:21, Jerry Eckert wrote: Karl J. Runge wrote: And btw, pressing "Shift-PageUp" will scroll back at Linux Console and in xterm (but won't always catch all of a big listing). Thank you!! That may be the single most useful piece of information I've seen all

Re: FTP ? ls more than the screen can hold

2000-03-21 Thread Bill Freeman
Chris writes of not having a good way to look at more than a screen worth of interactive program output. While I'm sure that we'll hear many other interesting approaches, let me plug EMACS. The stuff below works under X or at the linux consoles. First, for the general case,

qmail v. sendmail...

2000-03-21 Thread T. Warfield
The company i'm presently employed with (i use that term loosely) is contemplating bringing our pop mail inhouse. Currently, we're using sendmail, but i'm still a bit baffled by the m4 techniques -- i was wondering if anyone had better luck with qmail. thanks in advance todd -- T. Warfield

Re: Home Network

2000-03-21 Thread Ferenc Tamas Gyurcsan
Hi, Of course the next step is to run a log checker then you get to see all Courtney? It's gonna report the portscans, and write a mail to the root. Ferenc P.S. This new reply to thing really sucks. Whose idea was it? I didn't follow the thread about this, I thought common sense would rule.