Just a quick note to our Compaq folks on the list about the release of
some of their clustering technology for Linux:
http://opensource.compaq.com/
http://opensource.compaq.com/sourceforge/project/?group_id=23
http://opensource.compaq.com/sourceforge/project/?group_id=22
License (GPLv2):
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Jeffry Smith wrote:
Just a quick note to our Compaq folks on the list about the release of
some of their clustering technology for Linux:
Great. Now I can cluster a bunch of Compaq systems running Linux, but still
need to install MS-Windows to administer the RAID
Benjamin Scott said:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Jeffry Smith wrote:
Just a quick note to our Compaq folks on the list about the release of
some of their clustering technology for Linux:
Great. Now I can cluster a bunch of Compaq systems running Linux, but still
need to install MS-Windows to
Because Linux software is usually copyrighted under GPL, I have the impression
that you can copy a distribution at will.
Is that impression accurate? I'm looking at an official Red Hat 7.1 CD and it
has the following notice:
Copyright (c) 2001 Red Hat, Inc.
All Rights reserved. Made in the
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Alex Hewitt USG wrote:
Because Linux software is usually copyrighted under GPL, I have the
impression that you can copy a distribution at will.
A distribution is almost always an aggregation of separate works on a single
medium. Each work has its own copyright, and
Sorry, not trying to trump you guys but wanted to mention what we (IBM)
have done with Linux Clusters. That's what I do and Linux Clusters are
really, really getting some attention. They just released the new top500
lists.
On the fastest computer list at http://www.top500.org or more
I think that the business of putting a copyright on top of a collection of
software where individual projects are copyrighted under GPL is pretty
confusing. I would avoid copying Red Hat's CD because I honestly can't say that
it would be completely legal. Either that or visit Red Hat's web page
Greg Kettmann said:
Sorry, not trying to trump you guys but wanted to mention what we (IBM)
have done with Linux Clusters. That's what I do and Linux Clusters are
really, really getting some attention. They just released the new top500
lists.
snip bunch of good pointers to HPC computing and
Greg Kettmann said:
...
On the fastest computer list at http://www.top500.org or more
specifically:
http://www.top500.org/list/2001/06/ Linux Clusters have moved up from
number 80 (Los Lobos in New Mexico) to numbers 30 and 31.
On the http://clusters.top500.org list or more specifically:
Alex Hewitt USG said:
I think that the business of putting a copyright on top of a collection of
software where individual projects are copyrighted under GPL is pretty
confusing. I would avoid copying Red Hat's CD because I honestly can't
say tha
t
it would be completely legal. Either that or
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Alex Hewitt USG wrote:
I would avoid copying Red Hat's CD because I honestly can't say that it
would be completely legal. Either that or visit Red Hat's web page where
they provide a link to a downloadable copy ...
Have you read the copyright notices on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On the http://clusters.top500.org list or more specifically: http://
clusters.top500.org/db/result.php3?limit=100Processor=%25Country=%25
Interconnect=%25order_type=descshow%5B1%5D=site_nameshow%5B2%5D=site
I guess what I was after was the restrictions that would apply to copying a Red
Hat CD. As I mentioned earlier, I don't think they're getting rich off their
package sales so I'd be loath to diminish in any way their ability to make money
from what they do. On the one hand these distributions
Also keep in mind that the GPL is a copyright(left), so you can still
copyright something that's released under the GPL.
-Mark
Alex Hewitt USG wrote:
I guess what I was after was the restrictions that would apply to copying a Red
Hat CD. As I mentioned earlier, I don't think they're
Jeff Dike said:
Good stuff. Here's a little bit of shell that will go down that list
extracting the OS for each one:
for i in `wget -q -O - 'http://clusters.top500.org/db/result.php3?limit=10
0Pr
o
cessor=%25Country=%25Interconnect=%25order_type=descshow%5B1%5D=site_n
ame
s
I know one of the problems I've had with Linux apps is project management
software - MS Project seems to be the standard, and darn near only one.
Now, we have an open source PM:
http://mrproject.codefactory.se/
(OK, beta, and I haven't played enough to find the weak points, but it's a
start)
Jeffry,
there's also phpprojekt...
(sorry.. don't have the URL handy but you should be able to find it on
fm...)
cheers,
J.
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Jeffry Smith wrote:
I know one of the problems I've had with Linux apps is project management
software - MS Project seems to be the standard,
Tutos - check sourceforge. Production stable
-Original Message-
From: Joshua S. Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 4:11 PM
To: Jeffry Smith
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Project Management
Jeffry,
there's also phpprojekt...
(sorry.. don't have the
Hello all,
Want we want to do is create a VPN between a Linux server (Red Hat 6.2,
kernel 2.2.19) and Win95 (and Win98, and WinME) clients, using IPsec. On the
server side, FreeS/WAN (www.freeswan.org) is the obvious choice. What I am
less sure about is the client.
Does anyone know of an
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I missed the one NT, but notice that, of those that list an OS, 88
are Linux.
And I bet the top unspecified one is also running Linux. It's located at Sun,
and if it were running Solaris, I bet they would
If you mean the this one:
http://clusters.top500.org/db/entry.php3?id=4
it is hard to believe those 90 8-way boxes are not running Solaris,
especially back in 1999. I imagine it is just some oversight in the
info provided at/to top500.org the OS and some other fields are not
filled
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it is hard to believe those 90 8-way boxes are not running Solaris,
especially back in 1999. I imagine it is just some oversight in the
info provided at/to top500.org the OS and some other fields are not
filled in.
Yeah OK, I'll
But of course there is. There are several, in fact. There is PGPNet,
which can be configured to use either PSK or RSA. There is also IRE
Safenet SoftPK, Windows2000, and SSH Sentinel. Each one has it's own
little quirks, but they do work. You may want to look at some of the
patches and add-ons to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I missed the one NT, but notice that, of those that list an OS, 88
are Linux.
And I bet the top unspecified one is also running Linux. It's located at Sun,
and if it were running Solaris, I bet they would have said so :-)
Jeff
24 matches
Mail list logo
