In a message dated: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 18:46:31 EDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Or so I am told. A lot of this information is based on Slashdot postings,
which are only slightly more reliable than a random-number generator. :-)
Actually, I believe a random-number generator is more reliable and
In a message dated: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 18:33:45 EDT
Tom Buskey said:
Yeah, but you know, I'd really like to be able to use (ex)mh as an
interface to an IMAP server. I really like the granular control I
have over my e-mail with both raw mh commands and exmh as a GUI. I
would *really* like to
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, at 8:45am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... you shouldn't allow NFS access to your mail spool ...
Ever. NFS's history of piss-poor file locking means a shared mailspool is
a recipe for disaster in any kind of heterogeneous environment. It might
work if your favorite
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ever. NFS's history of piss-poor file locking means a shared mailspool is
a recipe for disaster in any kind of heterogeneous environment.
yawn NFS file locking has gotten better over the years. But this
is a religious issue at this point, and I don't want to
On 25 Jun 2002, at 9:18am, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
Ever. NFS's history of piss-poor file locking means a shared mailspool is
a recipe for disaster in any kind of heterogeneous environment.
NFS file locking has gotten better over the years.
Right. The problem is that not every OS release
On 25 Jun 2002, at 9:18am, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
Maildir format works just fine over NFS, no locking required.
As does mh format :)
--
Seeya,
Paul
It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing,
but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away.
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:07:27 EDT
Rich Payne said:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, mike ledoux wrote:
That's one way, however you'd be transfering the message to the client,
figuring out where to put it and then sending it back again.
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Bayard Coolidge USG wrote:
Well, I'm not a surly curmudgeon, even though I'm retiring Friday,
Well, there's plenty of time yet to refine your nascent talents in that
area, Bayard ... and btw, congratulations! ;)
And may the merger be kind to your benefits package ... :)
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, at 2:18pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... now I'm fetchmailing and procmailing my work e-mail as well.
H... something just occurred to me. (I've got an idea, a'forming in
my brain)
Oh, oh ... :)
It would be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, at 8:45am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... you shouldn't allow NFS access to your mail spool ...
Ever. NFS's history of piss-poor file locking means a shared mailspool is
a recipe for disaster in any kind of heterogeneous environment. It might
Hi all,
If you had the choice between buying off the web or from the local
BestBuy for a slightly higher price, what would you do?
The advantages of buying off the web are obviously lower price,
though when you factor in S/H, customer service, return hassle, etc.
it pretty much seems a wash.
Take the price quote to Best Buy and ask them to match it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT - Where would you buy stuff?
Hi all,
If you had the choice between buying off the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, [EMAIL PROTECTED] hath spake thusly:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, at 8:45am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... you shouldn't allow NFS access to your mail spool ...
Ever. NFS's history of piss-poor file locking means a shared
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, [EMAIL PROTECTED] hath spake thusly:
On 25 Jun 2002, at 9:18am, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
Ever. NFS's history of piss-poor file locking means a shared mailspool is
a recipe for disaster in any kind of heterogeneous
14 matches
Mail list logo
