On Jan 12, 2006, at 8:25 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
It sounds like you could use a tutorial on Unix text processing and
command line tools, specifically, one which addresses pipes and
redirection, as well as the standard text tools (grep, cut, sed, awk,
etc.). While Paul's recommendation about the
On 1/12/06, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/12/06, Zhao Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm back, with another extract string question. //grinIt sounds like you could use a tutorial on Unix text processing and
command line tools, specifically, one which addresses pipes andredirection, as
I am running Suse and use apt-get for rpm or Yast with the Suse
repositories. I was asked for a
xdiif/mgdiff for rel4 .
I looked at www.rpmfind.net and found rpms for Suse 9.3 and PLD nothing
foir RedHat .
I then tried www.fedoratracker.org . This is even worse it finds nothing
for mgdiff.
On 1/13/06, Donald Leslie {74279} [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where should one look for the latest stuff for red hat
I'm not much familar with SuSE, but for Red Hat and Fedora, an
outstanding resource is the Dag Wiers / RPMforge repository. See
http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt/ and
On Jan 12, 2006, at 19:40, Zhao Peng wrote:
I also downloaded an e-book called Learning Perl (OReilly,
4th.Edition), and had a quick look thru its Contents of Table, but did
not find any chapter which looks likely addressing any issue related
to my question.
Good start. Read these
On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:26, Ben Scott wrote:
Once I added the dag repository to my YUM configuration, I find
I can usually find any given package by doing yum install foo or
yum search foo.
I'll second Ben's recommendation of Dag, and add try yumex if you're
in the mood for a stroll;
-Bill
On Jan 12, 2006, at 17:27, Martin Ekendahl wrote:
Too much eye candy or something, I can't put my finger on it. I like
my console!
init 3
will take care of that problem for you.
also
rpm --erase rhgb
to get rid of that stupid graphical boot screen (which doesn't work on
some
On 1/13/06, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll second Ben's recommendation of Dag, and add try yumex if you're
in the mood for a stroll;
Huh? What does try yumex do?
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 10:52 -0500, Ben Scott wrote:
On 1/13/06, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll second Ben's recommendation of Dag, and add try yumex if you're
in the mood for a stroll;
Huh? What does try yumex do?
yumex provides a GUI layer on top of yum. The benefit is
Zhao Peng wrote:
My goal is to :
1, extract string2 from each file name
2, then sort them and keep only unique ones
3, then output them to a .txt file. (one unique string2 per line)
It is really interesting how many ways there are to do things in *nix. My
first reaction, if this is a one
Kevin,
Thank you very much! I really appreciate it.
I like your find approach, it's simple and easy to understand.
I'll also try to understand your perl approach, when I got time to start
learning it. (Hopefully it won't be un-fulfilled forever)
I have one more question:
Is it possible to
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 11:40:26AM -0500, Zhao Peng wrote:
Kevin,
Thank you very much! I really appreciate it.
I like your find approach, it's simple and easy to understand.
I'll also try to understand your perl approach, when I got time to start
learning it. (Hopefully it won't be
On 1/13/06, Zhao Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to number the extracted string2?
find -name \*sas7bdat -printf '%f\n' | cut -d _ -f 2 | sort | uniq | cat -n
Run that pipeline in the directory you are interested in.
The find(1) command finds files, based on their name or other
On 1/13/06, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/13/06, Zhao Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to number the extracted string2?
find -name \*sas7bdat -printf '%f\n' | cut -d _ -f 2 | sort | uniq | cat -n
I forgot to mention: If the *only* files in that directory are the
ones
cat -n will number output lines
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Bill McGonigle wrote:
On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:26, Ben Scott wrote:
Once I added the dag repository to my YUM configuration, I find
I can usually find any given package by doing yum install foo or
yum search foo.
I'll second Ben's
Bill McGonigle wrote:
On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:26, Ben Scott wrote:
Once I added the dag repository to my YUM configuration, I find
I can usually find any given package by doing yum install foo or
yum search foo.
I'll second Ben's
On 1/13/06, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 12, 2006, at 17:27, Martin Ekendahl wrote:Too much eye candy or something, I can't put my finger on it. I like my console! init 3will take care of that problem for you.
also rpm --erase rhgbto get rid of that stupid graphical boot screen
Zhao Peng wrote:
string1_string2_string3_string4.sas7bdat
abc_st_nh_num.sas7bdat
abc_st_vt_num.sas7bdat
abc_st_ma_num.sas7bdat
abcd_region_NewEngland_num.sas7bdat
abcd_region_South_num.sas7bdat
My goal is to :
1, extract string2 from each file name
2, then sort them and keep only unique ones
Well, I've been running SuSE for a long time, since about 7.3 or so,so I'm a bit apprehensive about mixing packages between distributionsunless I'm REALLY sure about what's going to be put where."xdiif/mgdiff for rel4" is a bit confusing to me - what's "rel4" ? If you'rereferring to a Fedora
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin D. Clark) writes:
Zhao Peng writes:
I'm back, with another extract string question. //grin
find FOLDERNAME -name \*sas7bdat -print | sed 's/.*\///' | cut -d _ -f 2 |
sort -u somefile.txt
Or, to simplify this:
find ./ -name \*sas7bdat | awk -F_ '{print $2}'
Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unix Shell Programming by Kochan and Wood is a classic on shell programming
Portable Shell Programming by Blinn
The Awk Programming Language by Aho, Weinberger and Kernighan
I'm also a big fan of Kernighan and Pikes, The UNIX Programming
Environment.
Bill Sconce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
P.S. Have you noticed that almost every issue of Linux Journal now
seems to have an article whose tone essentially takes it for granted
that the obvious language for demonstrating some neat new application
is Python? Tomorrow, world domination...
No,
23 matches
Mail list logo
