Linux Math software (was Simple math considered physics...)

2007-11-22 Thread Jim Kuzdrall
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 23:27, Brian Chabot wrote: Also, to bring this more on topic, as a push for FOSS, with open source software you could use available source code for ballistics and aerodynamic modeling in order to find the exact answer here. In a closed source world, you'd have

Re: Linux Math software (was Simple math considered physics...)

2007-11-22 Thread Michael Costolo
On Nov 22, 2007 7:05 AM, Jim Kuzdrall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 21 November 2007 23:27, Brian Chabot wrote: Has anyone tried Maxima for Linux? I use its predecessor, Macsyma, on Win98 and absolutely love it. No, more honestly, I invested enough time working with it to become

Re: LinkedIn group for GNHLUG

2007-11-22 Thread Ted Roche
Ted Roche wrote: http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/42315/32A73B64F8DC FYI, for those who like to measure such things, we got 21 members in the first 24 hours. And in the second 24 hours, membership rose to 30. The temptation to form premature theories upon insufficient data is the bane of

Re: [OT] Simple math considered physics; turns out it's fun, not harmful

2007-11-22 Thread Jim Kuzdrall
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 17:51, Greg Rundlett wrote: I really like the indoor batting facility in Salisbury, MA (Extra Innings). I wondered how 'fast' the fast cage was Y = Big League pitch speed = 60.5 feet / .45 seconds = Y feet / 1 second Y = 134.444 feet / second * 3600 / 5280

Re: [OT] Simple math considered physics; turns out it's fun, not harmful

2007-11-22 Thread Michael ODonnell
If you're asking how fast does it appear to be going based on time of flight from the pitchers mound to the batter, the answer is 100mph. Heh. And I wonder if the insurance premiums aren't a bit more affordable if you explain to your insuror that you're only beaning your customers with

Re: [OT] Simple math considered physics; turns out it's fun, not harmful

2007-11-22 Thread mike miller
The real physics (1960's vintage, no calculators, no linux) answers (plural) are even simpler. If you're asking how fast is the ball going, it's going 50mph. If you're asking how fast does it appear to be going based on time of flight from the pitchers mound to the batter, the answer is

Re: [OT] Simple math considered physics; turns out it's fun, not harmful

2007-11-22 Thread Charles G Montgomery
Brian Chabot wrote In terms of education and its promotion, it might be interesting to use baseball physics to get students more interested who otherwise might not be... It's an opportunity that's being pursued. As one example there's a book specifically about baseball,

Re: [OT] Simple math considered physics

2007-11-22 Thread Jim Kuzdrall
On Thursday 22 November 2007 12:01, Ric Werme wrote: Sigh, one course I didn't take in college and kinda wish I had was Fluid Dynamics. I really should read up on that. I did show some movies in a FD class showing turbulent laminar drag. I took Fluid Mechanics at Michigan Tech (in the

Re: [OT] Simple math considered physics

2007-11-22 Thread Drew Van Zandt
I'm sure you can't MAKE kids interested in engineering, but there are certainly classes of toys that a great many of the more geek-inclined people I know remember fondly. LEGO Erector sets Tinkertoys Lincoln Logs Piles of junk + imagination Any I've missed? If I ever have children they're