Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
`Open Systems FTW'?
So..., I just recently heard about these guys:
http://www.system76.com/
Anyone here have experience with, or opinions of, them?
Nope.
But I do have (intimate you might say) experience with a *local*
provider of Linux
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Seth Cohn sethc...@gnuhampshire.org wrote:
I suggest a doodle.com vote to see who can make when...
Set it up and post the link. And if it's not obvious, explain how
to use it. :)
This is a group effort. :)
-- Ben
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Bill McGonigle b...@bfccomputing.comwrote:
On 10/05/2009 12:36 PM, Tom Buskey wrote:
Apple hasn't been as free with their hardware in the past (the 68k
systems) and the iPod/IPhone are in that group, but the x86 systems have
been fairly open to different
tune2fs -l /dev/sda1 | grep -i mount count
(Where /dev/sda1 is the presumed partition.)
-Ken
P.S. Insert creative ramblings here about how btrfs will allow on-line
fsck's, include per-file checksums, and wash your dishes.
On Tue, October 6, 2009 8:35 am, Alex Hewitt wrote:
My Ubuntu 8.10
Alex Hewitt writes:
My Ubuntu 8.10 system uses EXT3 for the root filesystem and will
automatically fschk the volume every 35 mounts. I haven't been able to
find out where the mount count is stored or how that data can be
retrieved. I don't want to change the automated fschk but I'd like to
Well, I'll be with you in spirit, and will lift a frosty mug that evening
to celebrate. I'm currently spending the summer in Hendersonville, NC,
where we have a second home, and run openSUSE 11.1 on the second hard drive
on my HP dv9000z laptop. I also have a 320GB USB drive with F11, openSUSE
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Alex Hewitt hewitt_t...@comcast.net wrote:
My Ubuntu 8.10 system uses EXT3 for the root filesystem and will
automatically fschk the volume every 35 mounts.
I see the question's been answered, but here's some general commentary, FWIW.
I generally find it's
Ben Scott wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Alex Hewitt hewitt_t...@comcast.net wrote:
My Ubuntu 8.10 system uses EXT3 for the root filesystem and will
automatically fschk the volume every 35 mounts.
I see the question's been answered, but here's some general commentary,
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Alex Hewitt hewitt_t...@comcast.net wrote:
My Ubuntu 8.10 system uses EXT3 for the root filesystem and will
automatically fschk the volume every 35 mounts. I haven't been able to
find out where the mount count is stored or how that data can be
retrieved. I
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Alex Hewitt hewitt_t...@comcast.net wrote:
I think when I set up my next system I'm going to make
the granularity of the file systems finer by dividing up
the mount points/partitions.
I should probabbly mention that when I wrote partition I actually
meant
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Thomas Charron twaf...@gmail.com wrote:
It really suprised me that I couldn't find this information in the
/proc fs anywhere.
What do you think this is, MS Windows? :) We've got a perfectly
servicable tool (dumpe2fs) that will tell us the information. Why
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Alex Hewitt hewitt_t...@comcast.netwrote:
Ben Scott wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Alex Hewitt hewitt_t...@comcast.net
wrote:
My Ubuntu 8.10 system uses EXT3 for the root filesystem and will
automatically fschk the volume every 35 mounts.
I also think it would be neat to have the gathering on the anniversary
date.
Well, to throw a little gasoline into the discussion:
o The date you mention is the date of the first meeting of
what-would-become the GNHLUG meeting. I still remember sitting around a
few weeks later trying to discuss
http://doodle.com/ysxe3gm9cdf3rdi5
Very obvious how to use it.
Doodle isn't perfect, but it's really good for finding the best date/time.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Ben Scott dragonh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Seth Cohn sethc...@gnuhampshire.org wrote:
I suggest
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Tom Buskey t...@buskey.name wrote:
And RAIDs should be scrubbed periodically.
Modern RAID controllers usually feature something called patrol
read, which reads all the blocks on the physical disks in the
background, when otherwise idle.
Is there a similar
On 10/06/2009 12:33 AM, Ben Scott wrote:
Somewhere in Manchester, perhaps --
Manch-Vegas is centrally located amongst most of NH's population
centers (sorry, Bill!)
Just to be pedantic, and the other 108 members of DLSLUG. But a party
is just a party and I don't have geolocation on the DLSLUG
On 10/06/2009 10:42 AM, Ben Scott wrote:
What do you think this is, MS Windows? :) We've got a perfectly
servicable tool (dumpe2fs) that will tell us the information. Why do
we need a kernel API for it? :)
No need to stick it in /proc, but parsing the output of utilities with
scripts is
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Bill McGonigle b...@bfccomputing.com wrote:
No need to stick it in /proc, but parsing the output of utilities with
scripts is subject to all kinds of potential errors and inefficiencies.
If that's your concern, the utility should have an output mode
that's
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Bill McGonigle b...@bfccomputing.com wrote:
On 10/06/2009 12:33 AM, Ben Scott wrote:
Manch-Vegas is centrally located amongst most of NH's population
centers (sorry, Bill!)
Just to be pedantic, and the other 108 members of DLSLUG.
Clearly what is needed
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Ben Scott dragonh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Bill McGonigle b...@bfccomputing.com
wrote:
On 10/06/2009 12:33 AM, Ben Scott wrote:
Manch-Vegas is centrally located amongst most of NH's population
centers (sorry, Bill!)
Just to
On October 06, 2009, Michael ODonnell sent me the following:
rant
Gr!! A long-standing source of frustration for me is that people who
definitely should know better insist on writing code that utters only
pretty outputs instead of useful, parseable info. Yes, it's darling
and precious
On 10/06/2009 10:19 AM, Alex Hewitt wrote:
Thanks Ken, Dave and Ben for the answers and thoughtful analysis. I
currently have essentially one large partition for Linux and another
large partition for Vista. I think when I set up my next system I'm
going to make the granularity of the file
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Ben Scott dragonh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Thomas Charron twaf...@gmail.com wrote:
It really suprised me that I couldn't find this information in the
/proc fs anywhere.
What do you think this is, MS Windows? :) We've got a
I have 2 Dell PowerConnects 3048.
http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/network/2T180/
48 port managed 10/100 switches
2 10/100/1000 ports
Rack ears are screwed on currently.
I have been told, both are fully working and were replaced when we moved
offices.
Dan
Ben Scott writes:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Tom Buskey t...@buskey.name wrote:
And RAIDs should be scrubbed periodically.
Modern RAID controllers usually feature something called patrol
read, which reads all the blocks on the physical disks in the
background, when otherwise idle.
The switches are called for.
Dan
Dan Miller wrote:
I have 2 Dell PowerConnects 3048.
http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/network/2T180/
48 port managed 10/100 switches
2 10/100/1000 ports
Rack ears are screwed on currently.
I have been told, both are fully working and were replaced
26 matches
Mail list logo
