On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Susan Cragin wrote:
>
> The Concord Monitor has in the past given my articles good exposure, the
> state is desperate to cut costs, and this could be a good thing for
> open-source.
>
>
The state employs several dozen programmers and the expected accompanying
manag
Susan
> What about schools that you are connected with? Do they run open-source
> software?
I believe that the Merrimack Valley School District has a lot of Open
Source deployments from LTSP terminals to using Moodle and other
things.
Back in 2006, Steve Amsden, a network administrator at MV, g
P.S.:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> ... consider Open Source software a via option, to be evaluated in all
> cases ...
s/software a via option/software a viable option/
(I would also recommend using the correct words, something I
sometimes have trouble with. ;-) )
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Susan Cragin wrote:
> Title: All NH taxpayer-supported computers and systems should run
> open-source software.
You asked for opinions. My opinion would be that *I* would prefer
that stated along the lines of "All NH government IT systems should
consider Open
I'm writing an opinion piece for the Concord Monitor.
Title: All NH taxpayer-supported computers and systems should run open-source
software.
I need examples of municipalities, states, and so on, that have switched to
open-source successfully, and what they use.
Did you use Drupal to put y
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Alan Johnson wrote:
> > ... Netgear WG111 (11b/g USB2) has always "just worked" ...
>
> Sorry for the stream of replies here, but do you know if it's using
> ndiswrapper or not? From what I can tell, the W
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Alan Johnson wrote:
> > ... the Netgear WG111 (11b/g USB2) has always "just worked" ...
>
> Do you have the WG111 v1, WG111 v2, or WG111 v3? Apparently it
> exists in three mutually-incompatible versions.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Alan Johnson wrote:
> ... Netgear WG111 (11b/g USB2) has always "just worked" ...
Sorry for the stream of replies here, but do you know if it's using
ndiswrapper or not? From what I can tell, the WG111 needed that in
earlier releases, but maybe not in current r
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Alan Johnson wrote:
> ... the Netgear WG111 (11b/g USB2) has always "just worked" ...
Do you have the WG111 v1, WG111 v2, or WG111 v3? Apparently it
exists in three mutually-incompatible versions.
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-d
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Alan Johnson wrote:
> I can't speak to all those other specifics because the Netgear WG111 (11b/g
> USB2) has always "just worked" ... don't remember having any trouble with
> the WG111 on Windows but it has been years.
Thanks. When lacking hard data, anecdotes
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> 1) retail brand names aren't terribly useful, they change vendors fairly
> often
I've noticed that.
Retail brand names perhaps may be more useful when it comes to
determining support/customer service history. Although past
performance
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> Did you ever run a 'repair' on the /boot mirror?
No. I've been avoiding that until I have a better understanding of
what's going on. Heck, I've been avoiding *rebooting* until I have a
better understanding of what's going on. :) (Than
A few caveats:
1) retail brand names aren't terribly useful, they change vendors fairly
often
2) IC vendors can run hot and cold between models and revs, some more
than others.
3) You should test in your environment.
4) Automatically disqualify any part that comes in a USB form-factor
with a sw
On 02/22/2010 03:06 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
>Based on what I'm seeing (in particular, the mismatch*only* being
> in the GRUB stage2 file), I'm going to conclude liberty's mismatch is
> due to GRUB being installed on both physical hard disks independently
> (booting from floppy). Whether or
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> Does such a thing exist?
>
In an infinite universe, everything exists.
If not, can someone at least recommend something that's worked well
> for them on both platforms?
>
I can't speak to all those other specifics because the Netgear WG
Hello, world!
Soliciting opinions on a good model of USB to 802.11b/g adapter to
buy. Needs to work well with both Linux and recent Microsoft Windows
(XP/Vista/7).
802.11b/g are also called "Wi-Fi" and "wireless Ethernet".
802.11a/n aren't needed but also don't count against.
"Good" is de
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> I believe the script is .
...
> The control flow of the script seems to be: The operation is only
> run if the array is in a clean and idle state. If the array is
> degraded or rebuilding, the operation is skipped for that array. The
> d
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Michael ODonnell
wrote:
> So far, then, it's looking like every Sunday at 4:22 all the RAIDs
> (all types or just RAID1?) in standard x86_64 CentOS5.4 (and RHAT?)
> boxes are broken and then resync'd.
All types (as I interpret the script source).
If the docum
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Michael ODonnell
wrote:
> Anybody else running CentOS5.x ...
liberty.gnhlug.org is running CentOS 5.4 with kernel
2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 (still haven't rebooted it).
liberty$ fgrep -i sync /var/log/kernel* | fgrep -i raid
/var/log/kernel:Feb 21 04:22:01 liberty ke
On 2010-02-22 at 13:39 -0500, Michael ODonnell wrote:
Ruh-rohhh
/var/log/messages: Feb 21 04:22:02 sbgrid-dev-architect kernel: md:
syncing RAID array md0
/var/log/messages: Feb 21 04:22:02 sbgrid-dev-architect kernel: md:
syncing RAID array md3
/var/log/messages.1: Feb 14 04:22:02
Ruh-rohhh
>/var/log/messages: Feb 21 04:22:02 sbgrid-dev-architect kernel: md: syncing
>RAID array md0
>/var/log/messages: Feb 21 04:22:02 sbgrid-dev-architect kernel: md: syncing
>RAID array md3
>/var/log/messages.1: Feb 14 04:22:02 sbgrid-dev-architect kernel: md: syncing
>RAID arra
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:06:57AM -0500, Michael ODonnell wrote:
> Anybody else running CentOS5.x (or RHAT equiv?) care to share the
> results from this command:
>
> grep -i sync /var/log/* | fgrep -i raid
Dude. Sweet.
1$ sudo grep -i sync /var/log/* | fgrep -i raid
Password:
/var/log/me
Anybody else running CentOS5.x (or RHAT equiv?) care to share the
results from this command:
grep -i sync /var/log/* | fgrep -i raid
It looks like the RAIDs on at least seven of our (mostly stock) CentOS5.4
systems are routinely getting broken and going through a resync operation
on a weekl
23 matches
Mail list logo
