Re: Re-installing W98 without endangering the Linux partitions?

2004-09-25 Thread bscott
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, at 6:11pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ben Scott said me too and then proceeded to tell us details far beyond the scope of the question in a language that uses only English words, but which isn't English. Heh. :) Seriously, if anyone has questions about what a particular

Forwarding unwilling network programs (was: Evolution and Exchange ...)

2004-09-25 Thread bscott
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, at 5:22am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Little easier than mucking with iptables and less parts to break. Another interesting hack is the dynamic port forwarding feature of OpenSSH's ssh(1) program (the -D switch). For example: ssh -D 1080 server.example.com That

Re: Good International Domain Registrars?

2004-09-23 Thread bscott
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, at 10:45pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm looking for recommendations for a good domain registrar who can handle international registrations. Technically speaking, each country is responsible for operating or appointing their own registry for their ccTLD. You can find the

Re: Re-installing W98 without endangering the Linux partitions?

2004-09-20 Thread bscott
On Sat, 18 Sep 2004, at 4:36pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I'm looking for tips, war stories, and warnings as to what to say to W98 install to minimize the likelihood of having to restore the Linux partitions. As others have noted, this is not really that big a problem. Most versions and

Re: Sun sells Open Office to Microsoft?

2004-09-20 Thread bscott
Coming into this a bit late, but knowledge seems to a bit scarce around this thread, so: On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, at 12:08pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.linuxelectrons.com/article.php/20040914141417417 Ho-hum. IANAL, but I'm pretty sure that agreement (the referenced document in the

(was: Verizon offering 3Mbps )

2004-09-09 Thread bscott
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, at 10:37am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's the latency like on that? I'm assuming with a 48K mile round-trip minimum for every packet, latency must be rather high? It's closer to 100K mile. Geostationary orbit is about 25K miles up. For a round-trip, that means 25K

Re: Speakeasy DSL

2004-09-09 Thread bscott
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, at 1:51pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only problem I've had was the initial install. Verizon came out to the house and ran two new lines (don't ask me why) *Two* new lines is rather odd. Typically, Covad DSL (which is what Speakeasy is using) brings in DSL on a

Verizon DSL and static IP address (was: Speakeasy DSL)

2004-09-09 Thread bscott
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, at 1:56pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Verizon will be cheaper for the speed, but their TOS specifically forbade running servers last time I checked. Yes, they do. And they do not plan on issuing static IP's. EVER. That is not correct. You can purchase a static IP option

RE: Verizon offering 3Mbps

2004-09-01 Thread bscott
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 7:50am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wish I could get it, but not in my part of Merrimack, I would need Adelphia and I will not use them. I'd rather have Adelphia then dial-up. Yah, Adelphia sucks, but when it comes to ISPs, Sturgeon's Law is overly optimistic. -- Ben

Re: Verizon offering 3Mbps

2004-09-01 Thread bscott
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, at 2:01pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: HB495 didn't get passed .. but it basically said that if somebody has their access point open that they did it like that on purpose. Uhh... if it didn't get passed then it does not matter *what* the bill said. A bill has precisely zero

Boot weirdnesses

2004-08-31 Thread bscott
I encountered a couple of weird problems booting my primary home computer today, and I wanted to share. Possibly relevant details: - Red Hat Linux 7.3 - GRUB 0.91-4 - Epox EP-8K7A+ motherboard (w/ latest BIOS) - AHA-2940UW SCSI host adapter (BIOS 2.20) - IDE hard disk - Multiple SCSI CD/DVD

Re: Verizon offering 3Mbps

2004-08-31 Thread bscott
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, at 10:06pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/53311 http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=19980609 http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=19980610 http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=19980611 ;-) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The

Re: Keep Password in KDE su

2004-08-29 Thread bscott
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, at 10:27am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Question: What happens, and what are the dangers, when you check Keep Password? How is the password stored and could this later be used as a hole by some malware? From reading the page you linked to, I surmise that the kdesud daemon

VoIP and paranoia (was: Replacing PBXes with Open Source)

2004-08-29 Thread bscott
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, at 8:08pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From a big brother perspective I'd be unhappy about the enhanced privacy ... The VoIP providers have already been told by The Powers That Be that they must make their services available for monitoring for legal reasons. Ironic that

Re: Free WiFI at Panera Bread on Amherst St, Nashua

2004-08-29 Thread bscott
Some additional commentary to add to this thread: * People have drawn the analogy to leaving your house unlocked and having stuff stolen. It's worth pointing out that, in the state of NH, if your property is not clearly posted as being private, people who wander on to it (or claim to have

Re: pcmcia vs pccard vs cardbus

2004-08-27 Thread bscott
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, at 11:18pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know that pccard is the same is pcmcia (easier for consumers). What is cardbus? PCMCIA the next version (well, next in 1997) In particular, PCMCIA cards are 16-bit and use 5 volts. CardBus cards (or at least, can be) are 32-bit

Re: Auth/system-auth POP3 daemon

2004-08-24 Thread bscott
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, at 12:43am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm beginning to wonder if the identd service is somehow sending the request to the client to identify itself to 10.x.x.x. AFAIK, identd doesn't initiate requests, it only responds to them. I expect either xinetd or the POP3

Re: Auth/system-auth POP3 daemon

2004-08-24 Thread bscott
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, at 9:18am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You want to disable the identd service. That isn't going to help at all. The OP's system is *sending* AUTH requests; identd only *responds* to ident requests. Turning off his identd isn't going to stop his box from sending requests

Re: Cannot receive broadcast,why?

2004-08-24 Thread bscott
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, at 3:20am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My system is redhat9. It cannot receive broadcast packages, I am sure the broadcast server send packages. I assume you mean packets and not packages. What is happening (or not happening) that tells you your computer is not receiving

Re: Auth/system-auth POP3 daemon

2004-08-24 Thread bscott
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, at 2:39pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exactly. But... Why would it work fine over one interface but time out on the other? xinetd is not bound to any specific interface. I doubt it has anything to do with the interfaces involved, but rather, the networks (and firewalls and

Re: Connecting OO to a remote MySQL server

2004-08-23 Thread bscott
On 22 Aug 2004, at 8:49pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Yes, I have the appropriate .jar files in my ClassPath under the OO Security setting). I had a semi-colon instead of a colon in the classpath. Sigh. One of the laws in one of those Laws of Public Forums lists is that you will only notice

Re: Connecting OO to a remote MySQL server

2004-08-23 Thread bscott
On 23 Aug 2004, at 9:36pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yet another thing that the Linux community needs to fix. s/Linux community/IT world/ -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other

Email security (was: Gmail..)

2004-08-22 Thread bscott
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004, at 7:05pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been waffling (heh, sorry) on whether or not I'm willing to trust to Gmail, but I'll never know unless I try (for my least sensitive mail, at least). If you're sending sensitive email unencrpted, you're already in trouble And you

Re: (New) GNU User Group

2004-08-22 Thread bscott
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004, at 2:11am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wish I could put more time into this announcement to explain the hows whats whys etc. FWIW: One thing trying to help GNHLUG has taught me is that the that the organization and administration is the critical part, and the hard part,

Re: Slightly-Offtopic - Networking audit question

2004-08-17 Thread bscott
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, at 7:38pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't really go portscanning/pinging the crap out of the network ... We had a couple customers say that they would leave if we did it again, even if it was a planned event and announced. IWF detected. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CDROM question

2004-08-17 Thread bscott
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, at 7:24am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nothing exciting - just a backup program. In a given week, I accumulate about 10-15 CD's worth of data that needs to be backed up and the company is too cheap to go with tape. Penny wise, pound foolish. But I'm sure I'm preaching to

Re: GRUB and two HDs

2004-08-17 Thread bscott
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, at 10:51am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately, this only works if both drives are in the system. If there's only the built-in drive, it boot to greet me with GRUB and a blinking cursor. I had expected that I still would have seen the menu, but only the Windows option

Re: MS Exchange Server competition

2004-08-17 Thread bscott
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, at 1:03am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And one more link that seems to be the most comprehensive, most up-to-date on the subject http://www.linuxmafia.com/faq/Mail/groupware.html Hm. Some of that stuff appears *very* interesting. I also see why I never found some of

Re: Can't boot from Core 2 CD

2004-08-17 Thread bscott
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, at 10:15am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The file i downloaded was FC2-i386-disc1.iso and then I sucked it back out of the cd using dd if=/dev/cdrom of=FC2-i386-disc1B.iso In my experience, that does not work right. Use readcd dev=/dev/sgcdrom f=cdimage.iso

Re: Can't boot from Core 2 CD

2004-08-17 Thread bscott
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, at 12:05pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dd if=/dev/cdrom of=FC2-i386-disc1B.iso In my experience, that does not work right. Use Interesting. I've used exactly that approach a number of times recently, and had no troubles. Perhaps the difference is bad sectors on the

Security esoterica (was: wipe utility)

2004-08-17 Thread bscott
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, at 11:51am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 09:58:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most important of all, in order to make use of data in a filesystem journal, you basically need to assume the attacker has achieved full root compromise of your

Re: UPS recommendations wanted

2004-08-16 Thread bscott
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, at 11:11am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone willing to comment on their experiences with specific UPSes with Linux? In my opinion, you can't go wrong with APC's Smart-UPS, Matrix, and Symmetra lines. They may not be the cheapest, but they always work, and well. Any

Re: UPS recommendations wanted

2004-08-16 Thread bscott
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, at 3:24pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've used APC SMART-UPS 1400 at a few installations with NUT and it's worked properly. I haven't specified them, they just seem to be popular - I think it's the biggest 120V unit they make in that model range. FYI: The Smart-UPS 1400

Re: Rockingham Park and the Northern Computer Shows: Sept. 28th (sic)

2004-08-16 Thread bscott
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, at 1:09am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AND the two tables will cost $200 + $10. for electricity.a lot more expensive than Hoss Traders. (sigh) This concerns me more then the morning. Not that I'm a morning person by any stretch of the imagination, but I can do it if I

Re: rant on pathetic example of Microsoft FUD

2004-08-16 Thread bscott
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, at 1:07am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was developing a CD-ROM product which contains multiple Microsoft PowerPointless (tm) presentations. You might as well give up on any hope of doing anything standards-compliant right there. :-/ Pedantic clarification: This isn't

Re: This monday: Webmin, Gentoo

2004-07-30 Thread bscott
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, at 10:48pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gentoo - an awesome file manager. I thought Gentoo was a distribution? -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other

Re: Google gives into the DMCA?

2004-07-30 Thread bscott
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, at 12:46pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I search for Kazza Lite Download, for non-illeageal reasons, of course, I get this at the bottom of the page ... [DMCA stuff removed] Yah, Google has been doing this for awhile. The DMCA says they have to, and Google's not about

Re: Sound issue

2004-07-29 Thread bscott
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, at 11:07am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I put in a music CD, it brings up the CD player just fine, that goes out and finds disk info to display, the CD plays, and I can hear it through the headphone jack on the front of the drive, but no sound comes out of the speakers.

Re: Sound issue

2004-07-29 Thread bscott
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, at 11:51am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... This requires more computrons ... So that's the most fundmental element of computing physics, it explains so much. ;-) Absolutely! http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/C/computron.html -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: automated social engineering at it's best (maybe?)

2004-07-29 Thread bscott
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, at 2:25am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I didn't get what I asked for ... Well, you were rather vague in what you asked for. What are you looking for, other than a magic-wand or a big-foam-clue-bat? The following procmail recipe will route everything claiming to be from

Re: Sound issue

2004-07-29 Thread bscott
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, at 9:01pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The most likely thing is you don't have the proper cable running from the back of the CD-ROM drive to the sound card. If you built the machine yourself, one should have come with the CD-ROM drive, if not, I'm not sure if anyone sells

Re: automated social engineering at it's best (maybe?)

2004-07-27 Thread bscott
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, at 2:07am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, anyone have any good procmail recipies for this bogosity? Since you're dealing with a message that forged the sender as coming from *your domain*, you might look into things such as SPF. If you can get away with it, you could

Re: Samba Question

2004-07-27 Thread bscott
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, at 5:31pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ( I now it is old but it is what I have) You know that Linux is free, right? You can go and download the latest Red Hat Linux (now called Fedora Linux) for free: http://fedora.redhat.com If you don't have the bandwidth, you

Re: Samba Question

2004-07-27 Thread bscott
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, at 5:31pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the logs say that Samba is started but I can not get it to show up on my windows network. Issue all of the following commands at the shell prompt on your Linux/Samba computer. Try: ps ax | grep smbd If you do not see at

Libranet redistribution (was: InstallFest)

2004-07-07 Thread bscott
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, at 10:59am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fantastic news: we're having an Installfest, hosted by Bruce Dawson at Miles Smith Farm. Anyone is welcome to come - you can get your machine installed with a high quality Free operating system... Hmm. Sounds like Libranet. Since

Re: FTP Download issues (was: Destination show up twice in traceroute)

2004-07-05 Thread bscott
Speaking of NAT issues, I've got one which is driving me nuts. Simple FTP downloads are failing to complete on my Linux box which is behind a firewall/NAT setup on a Linksys router. I have 6 or 7 computers behind the firewall, all sharing the same IP on the cable modem (Comcast).

Re: Destination show up twice in traceroute

2004-06-30 Thread bscott
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, at 8:21pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This isn't really a Linux question but with all the networking experts on the list, I figured this is as good a place to ask as any. To understand what you are seeing, one will have to know how IP and traceroute work. Every IP packet

Re: GNHLUG Nashua meeting, Tomorrow, June 22nd at Marthas

2004-06-23 Thread bscott
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, at 3:12pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Either way these last minute announcements make it difficult for those with busy lives to plan for and attend a distant meeting which is of interest as this one definitely is. AOLMe too!/AOL -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The

Announcements (was: GNHLUG Nashua meeting)

2004-06-23 Thread bscott
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, at 5:27pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry about the late announcement, I had the speaker some time ago ... I suggest that, when we secure a speaker, we make an immediate announcement. Even if we don't know the exact *date*. This way, there is nothing to remember -- get

Re: Announcements (was: GNHLUG Nashua meeting)

2004-06-23 Thread bscott
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, at 8:21am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suggest that, when we secure a speaker, we make an immediate announcement. Ooops, sorry, this was supposed to go to gnhlug-org@ and not gnhlug-discuss@. I must have removed the wrong header when I hit Reply. My mistake. Sorry for

Re: SCSI Tape drive question

2004-06-17 Thread bscott
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, at 7:19am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've set up a SCSI tape drive on a system. The drive is a SONY AIT *mumble mumble* on a symbios based card. Oh, that's easy. The answer is mumble mumble. Seriously, to help, we need information. We're not psychic. Model of tape

Re: Recommendations for VPN end point appliances?

2004-06-16 Thread bscott
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, at 9:38am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These will be the last Linksys VPN boxes I buy ... based on my experience trying to configure them. Yah, like I said, LinkSys is pretty horrible for VPN stuff. The thing that really worries me is: A VPN box that is doing things

Re: Recommendations for VPN end point appliances?

2004-06-14 Thread bscott
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, at 9:32am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: He dropped one line that really annoyed me. He stated that Windows Server 2003 performed a new authentication protocol that would break most Samba network share setups. It's not new. There has long been a feature in NT that supports

Re: Recommendations for VPN end point appliances?

2004-06-14 Thread bscott
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, at 10:13am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Public-key crypto in SNMP would probably be unweildy, especially since SNMP is supposed to have a light footprint to make it easy to put into small embedded systems. That's not the point I was making. A lot of customers just want to

Re: Recommendations for VPN end point appliances?

2004-06-13 Thread bscott
On 13 Jun 2004, at 1:32pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've had someone recommend SnapGear to me ... If you're speaking of the ClearPath SNAP box... No, I'm speaking of SnapGear. http://www.snapgear.com Hmmm... they appear to have been bought by CyberGuard. Since I don't really know

Re: Recommendations for VPN end point appliances?

2004-06-13 Thread bscott
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, at 9:40pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... shared secrets went out in the 1980s ... Maybe, but SNMP V3 still uses it.. That's hardly an endorsement. SNMP's approach to security issues has generally been to ignore them. (SNMP = Security? Not my problem!) The

Re: SCO Group stock plummets

2004-06-11 Thread bscott
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, at 6:27pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm wondering if there's another gamble involved. At today's closing price the total market cap for SCOX is $70.49M. Let's wait a few more weeks, and we'll buy it with the change I have left over from lunch... -- Ben Scott [EMAIL

Re: Bittorrent Fedora Core 2 MD5 failures?

2004-05-20 Thread bscott
On Thu, 20 May 2004, at 3:34pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone got suggestions for an ISO repair kit? Or am I SOL? If the MD5 checksum does not match, it means the CD image you have does not match the one that Red Hat/Fedora released. This most likely means one or more of the files on the CD

Re: Need some help with a hacker exorcism....

2004-05-18 Thread bscott
On Mon, 17 May 2004, at 12:34pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been hacked ... Quick answer: Copy any important data/files off to another computer, then wipe the hard disk(s) and reinstall everything from scratch. It's the only way to be sure the attacker hasn't subverted some part of the

Re: spam filters

2004-05-17 Thread bscott
On Fri, 14 May 2004, at 9:09pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking for recommendations for spam filtering. As others have said, SpamAssassin is a very good foundation. Even in the untrained factory install configuration, I find it does a very good job. I just used the canned procmailrc

Re: spam filters

2004-05-17 Thread bscott
On Sun, 16 May 2004, at 5:41pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OTOH, my honest answer is that only after I 'fessed up to myself that there's no free lunch have we been able to be in control of the spam mess. Indeed. Spam-filtering is a great one size does NOT fit all case. One person's spam is

SPF and spam (was: spam filters)

2004-05-17 Thread bscott
On Sun, 16 May 2004, at 5:41pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. SPF. This seems to be promoted as something we should really want - tightening the loose SMTP rules which permit spammers to pretend to be sending from arbitrary addresses (including yours). Background information (for the list):

Re: Comcast blocking port 25? (not what you think)

2004-05-10 Thread bscott
On Mon, 10 May 2004, at 6:47am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Recently my parents (that use Comcast) can no longer connect to port 25 of my server.. one that is legit, has correct reverse and MX records. Has anybody else seen this? More and more ISPs are blocking port 25 outbound on consumer

Re: Comcast blocking port 25? (not what you think)

2004-05-10 Thread bscott
On Mon, 10 May 2004, at 10:25am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yah, that's what I'm going to have to do.. BLAH.. stupid comcast. Get used to it. More and more ISPs are adding this. And I cannot say I entirely disagree with the policy. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in

Re: Comcast blocking port 25? (not what you think)

2004-05-10 Thread bscott
On Mon, 10 May 2004, at 10:53am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yah, that's what I'm going to have to do.. BLAH.. stupid comcast. Get used to it. More and more ISPs are adding this. And I cannot say I entirely disagree with the policy. Why? Mail abuse. A great deal of spam and other

Re: Comcast blocking port 25? (not what you think)

2004-05-10 Thread bscott
On Mon, 10 May 2004, at 11:04am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The solution is to add yet more and more entries into my mailertable file in sendmail. Why don't you just relay everything through your ISP? -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the

Re: Comcast blocking port 25? (not what you think)

2004-05-10 Thread bscott
On Mon, 10 May 2004, at 11:23am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mail abuse. A great deal of spam and other mail abuse comes from computers on consumer feeds that are incorrectly configured as a mail relay (don't ask me how, but it happens more often then you would think), or have been compromised

Re: Anti-spam methods (was: Re: Comcast blocking port 25? (not what you think))

2004-05-10 Thread bscott
On Mon, 10 May 2004, at 2:21pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm basically on the side of individual freedoms and don't like that port 25 egress filtering is being implemented by broadband vendors. Geeks (I include myself in this category) like to romanticize this idea of the big, happy Internet,

Re: Anti-spam methods (was: Re: Comcast blocking port 25? (not what you think))

2004-05-10 Thread bscott
On Mon, 10 May 2004, at 6:00pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do predict that spammers will adapt to this new authenticated email world rather quickly. Namely, they will modify their spam-cannon-laden viruses ... That seems likely, but how much email is send from virus-attacked computers?

Re: Large HD, old BIOS

2004-05-03 Thread bscott
On Sun, 2 May 2004, at 9:24pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I bought a motherboard, cpu and memory off a friend (P3 based). When I got the system put together, the BIOS (which I did flash to the latest version) only seems to recognize it as a 8.5 GB drive. However, even though the BIOS only sees

Re: Large HD, old BIOS

2004-05-03 Thread bscott
On Mon, 3 May 2004, at 9:08am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With lilo, it seems to just hang. I get LI and then nothing. That means LILO loaded what it though should be the second-stage boot loader, but had a problem executing it (possibly because it loaded the wrong thing). This might mean

Re: Large HD, old BIOS

2004-05-03 Thread bscott
On Mon, 3 May 2004, at 10:15am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I dunno - what is LBA? How do I find out if my drive is LBA or not? LBA = Logical Block Addressing. The original IBM-PC BIOS (and MS-DOS) used C/H/S physical block addressing. Each block (AKA sector) on the disk was addressed by

Re: Large HD, old BIOS

2004-05-03 Thread bscott
On Mon, 3 May 2004, at 10:17am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's what I was wondering. Not knowing much of anything about hardware, I didn't know if the linux distro's ability to see the whole drive would bypass the problem of the BIOS being able to see it. Well, remember, Linux distro means

Re: FOSS group in education

2004-04-28 Thread bscott
On 28 Apr 2004, at 9:03am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think they mostly need volunteers (and more interest) at this point. Where have I heard that before? ;-) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views

Cyrus/sieve/etc (was: Stop the maddness!)

2004-04-27 Thread bscott
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, at 3:11am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd be perfectly happy to expound on my cyrus-imapd / sieve / sendmail / mysql (or postgresql) / SMTP AUTH solution complete with virtual hosting if anyone's interested :-). Well, I'm definitely interested. Would you be

Re: 1U servers..

2004-04-27 Thread bscott
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, at 12:02pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That alone would make me say no thanks to buying it. Most 1U systems tends to have some kind of funkiness to them. That's the price you pay for stuffing hardware into such a small form-factor. In particular, the CD/FDD are very often

Re: Copying CDs

2004-04-26 Thread bscott
On 26 Apr 2004, at 11:58am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I seem to remember from a long time ago, that just dd'ing a CD (or hard drive for that matter) didn't produce workable results. Looks like things have gotten better since then. It's one of those it depends things. With CDs, between all

Policy routing and Linux

2004-04-26 Thread bscott
Hello world, Has any one on the list done anything with policy-based routing and Linux? Scenario: We have two Internet feeds, DSL and cable, both connected to a single Linux box. Said Linux box is also connected to our LAN -- it is our firewall/router/gateway. The Linux box has a default

Re: Policy routing and Linux

2004-04-26 Thread bscott
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, at 7:27pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... the commands I type don't seem to work. The system accepts them, and appears to make changes to the routing tables, but the packets still end up going out the wrong interface. Turns out that is not entirely true. I was testing my

Re: Stop the maddness!

2004-04-25 Thread bscott
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, at 10:19pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list for those who just can't resist the off-topic? Not sure if you are serious or not. If you are... We can create two lists, if that proves to be the best solution. I generally dislike this

Re: sniffers

2004-04-25 Thread bscott
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, at 8:23pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just got a question from a friend who is looking for a sniffer to capture network session traffic ... Ethereal. http://www.ethereal.com It has both excellent GUI and command-line components, and includes analysis code for an amazing

Re: Copying CDs

2004-04-23 Thread bscott
On 23 Apr 2004, at 10:09am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know how I can copy the whole CD as an ISO filesystem file? Use the readcd program that comes with the cdrecord/mkisofs package. The syntax is (from memory, so double-check this): readcd dev=/dev/sgfoo f=cdimage.iso

Re: Problem (was: Re: need help with tool requirement)

2004-04-21 Thread bscott
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, at 1:33am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Electronic voting machines are feared to be vulnerable to hidden malicious code (Easter eggs) that could subvert voter intentions and deliver votes to the wrong candidates. Open the source code to public review. That's the solution.

Re: Problem (was: Re: need help with tool requirement)

2004-04-21 Thread bscott
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, at 9:24am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems to me that what FOSS denotes and what it commonly connotes are two different things. Absolutely. However, you still haven't clarified what *you* meant in your message, which is why I brought it up. :-) -- Ben Scott [EMAIL

Re: Problem

2004-04-21 Thread bscott
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, at 10:21am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I realize the problems in Florida, and the need for something better. One of the points I was trying to make that one cannot really fix the problem in Florida. But as I pointed out in my email, how can you trust what's out there now

Re: Problem (was: Re: need help with tool requirement)

2004-04-21 Thread bscott
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, at 10:45am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This tends to feed the desire (requirement?) for a system that counts votes accurately. Florida 2000 just provided proof that the existing systems did not meet requirements. Question is, how to meet those requirements? Again: The

Re: Problem (was: Re: need help with tool requirement)

2004-04-21 Thread bscott
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, at 11:15am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some folks think that's important too, maybe enough to accept the flaws in those systems. I might argue that, in that event, we deserve what we get. Of course, I might also argue that, in that case, we are already doomed. But

Re: Administrivia: Subject line tagging

2004-04-20 Thread bscott
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, at 8:58am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can we also please lose the [gnhlug-announce] clutter on Subject: lines for that channel? Done. -- Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or

Re: The ultimate Linux installation... ;^)

2004-04-20 Thread bscott
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, at 3:18am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 02:04:38PM -0400, Hewitt Tech wrote: http://www.strangehorizons.com/index.pl?Contents=/2004/20040405/badger.shtml A sentence or two about what we'll find at that link would be great... I think the subject

Re: Filtering on List-Id (was Re: Administrivia: Subject line tagging)

2004-04-20 Thread bscott
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, at 2:03pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But anyway, the List-Id header is guaranteed to be present and the same for all messages delivered through this mailing list. So, one should filter on that, and not anything else, to identify list mail. This is a point worth taking

Re: Administrivia: Subject line tagging

2004-04-20 Thread bscott
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, at 8:29pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, folks, sorry to have brought up the subject ... Don't be. It's more on-topic then a lot of other discussions we've had in this forum, and it resulted in knowledge-sharing. That's the primary purpose of this group. Next step is

Re: [gnhlug-announce] Oh NO!, It is Hoss Traders again!

2004-04-19 Thread bscott
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, at 11:23pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hoss traders is at the Hopkinton Fair Groups in Hopkinton, New Hampshire, and this year will be held Friday, April 30th and Saturday, May 1st. I should be able to be there both Fri and Sat, with my usual collection of equipment, and a

Re: Server/mail/naming setup theory

2004-04-18 Thread bscott
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, at 11:50am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (I had a client who almost lost a $50,000 deal due to a single missed email.) Eeeesh. Yah. I regularly remind my clients that Internet email is not and never was a guaranteed reliable service, and that if the subject matter is

Sample private DNS zone configuration

2004-04-18 Thread bscott
Hello world, After giving my recent presentations on DNS at a couple of LUG meetings, I received several requests for copies of my example DNS zone files. What I've done is dress up my examples to be even more like examples, and posted them here:

Re: Somewhat OT: Small LED light suggestions

2004-04-16 Thread bscott
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, at 4:17pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... I know Ben Scott has a few very blinding LED flashlights ... Who, me? Inova has some really cool and well-made stuff. I suspect you would be interested in their 24/7 product. It has multiple LEDs for brightness and color (white,

Re: Future Meeting? (MythTV)

2004-04-16 Thread bscott
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, at 1:09pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Though it runs only on windows... check out one called Sagetv http://www.sage.tv/ So it (1) costs money and (2) won't run on Linux. I'll pass. ;-) I'm much more psych'ed about Travis's MythTV project. He's been describing some of

Time (was: GIMP 2.0 Release Party?)

2004-04-16 Thread bscott
2On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, at 1:55pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been hard at work getting my presentation put together ... On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, at 12:43pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a little dismayed that there has been zero response to my message about GIMP 2.0 And you waited a whole 23

Re: MELBA Quarterly meeting announcement / advertising

2004-04-16 Thread bscott
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, at 1:55pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to start announcing the meeting ... Maybe I'm just picky, but I think meeting announcements should generally include the date, time, and location of the meeting. ;-) (Yes, I realize you mentioned MELBA, but one would

Re: Server/mail/naming setup theory

2004-04-16 Thread bscott
On 13 Apr 2004, at 10:51pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, I'll see if I can give you some more info...I haven't had a chance to try anything though as the Bruins are about to go into double overtime...:) Yes, they must be taking drama lessons from the Patriots. ;-) Although last night's

Re: Server/mail/naming setup theory

2004-04-13 Thread bscott
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, at 2:03pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I ... found out that my mail was blocked from here and I could not hit the web page. This turned out to be due to dns issues. Could you explain this in a little more detail, please? What were the DNS issues? I found that I could hit

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >