On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Joshua Judson Rosen
wrote:
> Your comments beg the question, "*do* HAL and D-Bus ever actually need
> to be restarted" (and, if so, why?).
As far as I know, they need to be restarted on two conditions:
(1) Some HAL/DBus config changes
(2) Software changes (to
Ben Scott writes:
>
> This is actually from 2005, but I just found it now:
>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/desktop-bugs/2005-August/002500.html
>
> Yes, that's right. Rather than fix broken software, the sanctioned
> course of action is to reboot the system if HAL or DBus need to be
>
Coleman Kane writes:
>
> On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 10:59 -0400, Tom Buskey wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Ben Scott
> > wrote:
> > > This is actually from 2005, but I just found it now:
> > >
> > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/desktop-bugs/2005-August/002500.html
> > >
> >
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Coleman Kane wrote:
> I think you're confusing "all of Linux" with Ubuntu.
Read the link target again. The HAL/DBus people in Ubuntu wanted to
do the right thing, and just restart the daemons. All the upstream
package maintainers -- the people writing the app
And it's going to get worse. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/424927Sadly, I'm quite excited about the brain f*#k scheduler. Susan-Original Message-
From: Shawn O'Shea
Sent: Oct 16, 2009 7:36 PM
To: Greater NH Linux User Group
Subject: Re: It's
Along similar lines to Ben's original link, apparently stability problems in
Ubuntu have frustrated the Eeebuntu developer to the point that he is giving
up on maintaining Eee utils for Ubuntu for the EePC.
http://www.fewt.com/2009/10/i-give-up.html
-Shawn
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Colema
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 10:59 -0400, Tom Buskey wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Ben Scott
> wrote:
> This is actually from 2005, but I just found it now:
>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/desktop-bugs/2005-August/002500.html
>
> Yes, t
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
> This is actually from 2005, but I just found it now:
>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/desktop-bugs/2005-August/002500.html
>
> Yes, that's right. Rather than fix broken software, the sanctioned
> course of action is to reboot the system
This is actually from 2005, but I just found it now:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/desktop-bugs/2005-August/002500.html
Yes, that's right. Rather than fix broken software, the sanctioned
course of action is to reboot the system if HAL or DBus need to be
restarted/refreshed.
Can anyone
