It's also entirely possible that there is a pirate broadcaster -
Heh. I'm pretty sure it's not a pirate broadcast station
unlesss their demographic studies indicate there's a market
segment that's fond of the sound of motor noise or arcs
discharging. (And, yes - I realize that the former is
Michael ODonnell writes:
Something near our house has recently started
generating spectacular amounts of radio intereference
that's most noticeable around 89MHz. I have no
portable radio equipment of any kind except a humble
little $10 handheld with a normal telescoping antenna
A google search for 89MHz reveals below. Gotta wonder if a fellow geek in
the area is hacking a linux box and leaving running in the open air
(no case). :-\
Can you record the audio and make a wav file? Someone on this list might
be able recognize the 'noise' and narrow the search for its
Bill Freeman wrote:
In either case, however, a strong enough (interfering) signal
will give no audible change in response over a fairly broad range of
signal strengths (unless it has an S meter). For work close to the
source, then, you need a means of seriously attenuating the signal.
There is a technique that works without going to RadShack or the local
supermarket for parts... Though, as has been pointed out, it works
better for AM than FM... but it should work in FM.
It's called Body Shielding. Your body can act as a shield. Tune the
Beauty! I suspected that sort
Okay, here's a strange one.
On a Red Hat 9 system I've encountered a situation where there are two
processes that I cannot kill when using kill -9 (or any other value, for
that matter.)
What's the deal with that? The only kind of process that I've ever run
across that I could not kill was a
On Friday 17 February 2006 01:58 pm, Dan Coutu wrote:
Okay, here's a strange one.
On a Red Hat 9 system I've encountered a situation where there are two
processes that I cannot kill when using kill -9 (or any other value, for
that matter.)
The processes could be in an IO Lock, maybe trying to
On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 02:35:15PM -0500, Neil Schelly wrote:
On Friday 17 February 2006 01:58 pm, Dan Coutu wrote:
Okay, here's a strange one.
On a Red Hat 9 system I've encountered a situation where there are two
processes that I cannot kill when using kill -9 (or any other value, for
On 2/17/06, Dan Coutu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a Red Hat 9 system I've encountered a situation where there are two
processes that I cannot kill when using kill -9 (or any other value, for
that matter.)
Do a ps aux and note their status. It's D, right? That means
they're in
On Friday 17 February 2006 1:58 pm, Dan Coutu wrote:
Okay, here's a strange one.
On a Red Hat 9 system I've encountered a situation where there are two
processes that I cannot kill when using kill -9 (or any other value, for
that matter.)
What's the deal with that? The only kind of process
Ben Scott wrote:
On 2/17/06, Dan Coutu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a Red Hat 9 system I've encountered a situation where there are two
processes that I cannot kill when using kill -9 (or any other value, for
that matter.)
Do a ps aux and note their status. It's D, right? That
On 2/17/06, Dan Coutu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, the I/O wait seems likely. We've been having trouble with an IOMega
REV 10 disk autoloader ever since we bought the thing.
Yikes! I've never, ever encountered an IOMega product that didn't
suck in some major way. No wonder it doesn't work.
On Feb 17, 2006, at 15:55, Ben Scott wrote:
've never, ever encountered an IOMega product that didn't
suck in some major way. No wonder it doesn't work.
Hey, my first linux box ran off a 150MB Bernoulli drive hooked up to my
soundblaster.
That was before Iomega gave up on Bernoulli effect
It's called Body Shielding. Your body can act as a shield. Tune the
Yes.
Advanced body shielding involves a secondary conductive shielf. You
put the radio in Pringles can, or other deep open-top conductive case,
antenna up, and using a lanyard (string) to pull up (and let gravity
pull down)
14 matches
Mail list logo
