On Mar 19, 2007, at 18:38, Ben Scott wrote:
- It puts most of the burden on the operators, not the perpetrators
I'm much more afraid of the legal system than losing $20 - the burden
would depend on individual decisions like that. Some days I'd be
happy to have somebody do monitor
On Mar 19, 2007, at 17:54, Ben Scott wrote:
/me ponders running early Linux distros in a VM, for the hack value...
I've got some InfoMagic discs with floppy images around here
somewhere (frikkin' packrat) if you want them.
I'm curious if there's a VM that emulates an old enough PC for
Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did the docs mention whether it was only on a PPC system that it
crashed?
They didn't mention which version. I seem to be running v.9.0, not
sure of the sub-version (i.e. dXX). I'll play around with it some
more and see what I can get. Maybe it's
On 3/20/07, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did the docs mention whether it was only on a PPC system that it
crashed?
They didn't mention which version. I seem to be running v.9.0, not
sure of the sub-version (i.e. dXX). I'll play around with
Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are you running PPC or x86 OpenBSD?
x86.
I've been trying to play with it under Solaris 10 x86 and haven't done the
tun/tap stuff yet. I was able to get XP to run updates though.
QEMU's user-based networking will just work with respect to using
the host
Bill McGonigle wrote:
Funny thing is I'm doing some work later today on a new project using a
Slackware-based distro. (first time in ~12 years)
FWIW, I'm wiping my Ubuntu 6.10 this week and putting Slack 11 back on.
I'm just too stupid for these modern distributions. :-)
--charlie
On 3/20/07, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the tun/tap stuff you can have the guest OS create a bridge on
one of it's physical NICs and have your guest OS use normal IP address
to appear to other systems on your LAN as just another system. I have
this up and running under Linux,
On 3/20/07, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- It puts most of the burden on the operators, not the perpetrators
I'm much more afraid of the legal system than losing $20
From the standpoint of the operators, that doesn't matter. Consider:
I = You bring a CRT in
P = You pay the
On 03/20/2007 11:43 AM, Ben Scott wrote:
On 3/20/07, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By time my friend, Jim Hart, convinced me to try Linux, Slackware was
out (with an IP stack!), so I'm not really sure what Yggdrasil
supported, myself.
Yggdrasil was last released circa 1995. It
On 3/20/07, Mark Komarinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started using Linux in the summer of '92 (get off my lawn!), so it was
even pre-distro. IIRC, there has always been an IP stack of some sort,
since I had a Western Digital *mumble* ISA Ethernet controller that I
could use to network with
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:22:25PM -0400, Tyson Sawyer wrote:
...oh crap! I replied to a message that came from a list, but when I
was about to click send I see that my reply doesn't go back to where
the message came from. Now off to edit the To: field before I can
click send.
That is a
mike ledoux writes:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:22:25PM -0400, Tyson Sawyer wrote:
...oh crap!
...
That is a problem... with your mail reader. If it bothers you, I
recommend switching to a mail reader that doesn't have that problem,
rather than complaining.
Then I'd have other things
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 03:02:40PM -0500, Bill Freeman wrote:
mike ledoux writes:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:22:25PM -0400, Tyson Sawyer wrote:
...oh crap!
...
That is a problem... with your mail reader. If it bothers you, I
recommend switching to a mail reader that doesn't have
mike ledoux writes:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 03:02:40PM -0500, Bill Freeman wrote:
mike ledoux writes:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:22:25PM -0400, Tyson Sawyer wrote:
...oh crap!
...
That is a problem... with your mail reader. If it bothers you, I
recommend switching
On 3/20/07, mike ledoux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, but finding new things to complain about is at least half of the fun!
Back in my day, we only had three things to complain about, and we
liked it that way!
--
One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / And the next it's rolling over me
On 3/21/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, world!
So, I'm thinking about getting a new handheld computer (AKA PDA),
before the one I have now finishes crumbling into dust. (For purposes
of this discussion, let's assume my handheld and my mobile phone will
be two different devices.)
So, I'm thinking about getting a new handheld computer (AKA PDA),
before the one I have now finishes crumbling into dust. (For purposes
of this discussion, let's assume my handheld and my mobile phone will
be two different devices.) I'd like to hear people's opinions and
experiences on
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 05:11:00PM -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
I'm especially interested in the Sharp Zaurus. I understand that,
while it's nominally not sold in the US, it's pretty easy to find
vendors importing it, and that the manufacturer support picture is
pretty good (for the immediate
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 08:41:10 -0400
Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A note to save others some difficulties when using caff to sign keys...
I spent several hours today looking into Postfix, reading the sources
of caff, and searching for HOWTOs.
Can anyone give me a pointer as to how to do
On 3/20/07, Travis Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(For purposes of this discussion, let's assume my handheld and
my mobile phone will be two different devices.)
I would seriously consider combining the two devices. I find it very helpful.
~sigh~ Yes, yes. That's the way it would be, in an
On Mar 20, 2007, at 6:30 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
~sigh~ Yes, yes. That's the way it would be, in an ideal world.
But wireless carriers universally see any cell phone, and all the data
on it, as *their* property. They don't sell you a phone, they let you
use their phone, maybe, for a little
~sigh~ Yes, yes. That's the way it would be, in an ideal world.
But wireless carriers universally see any cell phone, and all the
data
on it, as *their* property. They don't sell you a phone, they let
you
use their phone, maybe, for a little while, so long as you keep up on
your
On Mar 20, 2007, at 8:44 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
I object
to the whole attitude wireless carriers have.
So do I, but in the end I have bigger things to worry about.
Besides, as soon as Google rolls out their nationwide Wifi, and
accompanying phone it won't be such an issue anymore.
On 3/20/07, brk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I object to the whole attitude wireless carriers have.
So do I, but in the end I have bigger things to worry about.
From what I can tell, most people have that attitude. Which, of
course, is what lets so many companies get away with such lousy
Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It'll be a sad day when CDs no longer have a device to play in. I
consolidated lots of old floppy media to a few CDs. I have hundreds of CDs
now.
Something tells me there's someone out there who has consolidated a bunch of:
- paper tape to punch cards
Bruce Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Obligatory-Linux-insertion
Of course, we could write some software that runs on Linux that drives
robots to disassemble computers/monitors/other hazardous waste, but why
bother (hint, prod).
/Obligatory-Linux-insertion
Of course, we'd have to be sure
- paper tape to punch cards
- punch cards to 9-track tape
- 9-track tapes to 8 floppies
- 8 floppies to 5.25 floppies
- 5.25 floppies to 3.5 floppies
- 3.5 floppies to a CD
- CDs to DVD
And they'll probably consolidate all there DVDs someday to something
else. Somewhere,
Jon 'maddog' Hall wrote:
- paper tape to punch cards
- punch cards to 9-track tape
- 9-track tapes to 8 floppies
- 8 floppies to 5.25 floppies
- 5.25 floppies to 3.5 floppies
- 3.5 floppies to a CD
- CDs to DVD
And they'll probably consolidate all there DVDs someday to something
else.
28 matches
Mail list logo
