Who : Everybody
What : Program suggestions and improvements
Where: Martha's Exchange
Day : Thur 19 Jul **Next Week**
Time : 6:00 PM for grub, 7:30 PM for discussion
:: Overview
What past discussion topics did you like most? What new issues
should be covered? Any suggestions for
-- Original message --
From: Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A quick Google found Linux tools to do the formatting and presumably
copying, so a working TRS-80 is not needed, just a 5.25 floppy drive
(and Linux, the
I saw the various discussions of OpenVPN TCP vs. UDP on the list, and in
particular saw some people saying TCP over TCP is bad, avoid unless
necessary and others saying That's only under rare circumstances. I
switched the work VPN from TCP (which it has been for almost a year) to UDP,
and users
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 02:30:02PM -0400, Chip Marshall wrote:
On 7/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Threads like this one on the cent key - consisting of lots of short,
curious, posts - really make me wish we had a #gnhlug on freenode or
something.
Not sure how many
Hi all,
We just had this question come up here at work, as we are trying to
deal with BIOS upgrading. In case anyone needs to know how to do
this, it's rather simple and elegant:
- Grab a DOS executable stub from here:
ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/MSDOS/unz552x3.exe
- Create
This reminds me of a discussion I had with Maddog and Bill Sconce earlier this
week, regarding the possibility of a show-and-tell of some of these ancient
computers. I'm sure others would be very curious to see some of these things
in working condition, I know I would. Especially a paper tape
We're trying to debug (what we assume is) a nasty application bug in
software deployed on some RHEL3 boxes, and it looks like we might have to
resort to instrumenting some low-level funcs in libc to accomplish that.
Having paid RHAT for access to the channel that entitles us to
grab RPMs from
Has anybody here implemented name to extension mapping with Trixbox,
SIP, and DNS SRV records?
The idea is somebody places a SIP call to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and
it looks up the DNS SRV record, finds that my SIP server can be
reached at librescu.bfccomputing.com:5060/udp and then [unknown
Drew Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I saw the various discussions of OpenVPN TCP vs. UDP on the list, and in
particular saw some people saying TCP over TCP is bad, avoid unless
necessary and others saying That's only under rare circumstances. I
switched the work VPN from TCP (which it
On 7/12/07, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anybody here implemented name to extension mapping with Trixbox,
SIP, and DNS SRV records?
The idea is somebody places a SIP call to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and
it looks up the DNS SRV record, finds that my SIP server can be
reached at
On 7/12/07, Derek Atkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Drew Van Zandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I saw the various discussions of OpenVPN TCP vs. UDP on the list, and in
particular saw some people saying TCP over TCP is bad, avoid unless
necessary and others saying That's only under rare
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 20:09:37 -0400
Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Travis Roy wrote:
On my mac I can hold option $
Just my 2¢
___
On my ThinkPad under FC6, I can just type ¢ By selecting Menu, Character
Map, View, by Unicode Block,
RE: Zen.
Find one line from me posted at the bottom.
-Bill
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:04:53 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:26:56 -0400
On Jul 10, 2007, at 14:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And I am not my name. I am
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:55:19 -0400
Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know where I can find a link to the video shown at
lastnight's GPLv3 presentation in Durham? It would be much
appreciated
Isn't it on YouTube? Search for 'GPLv3'
Ah. THIS is
On 7/12/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But from a practical standpoint, it only *really* makes a difference
when you have massive packet loss on a link.
I've seen other real-world reports where switching from TCP to UDP
apparently made a difference. I'm not sure massive packet
Anyone like to buy a functional OSI 4P-MF with a whopping 24K of memory?
Mini-floppy is 80K as I recall. All docs and original shipping box.
Or what about a TI-94A with expansion box? No that is a thing of
beauty. They really knew how how to make hardware. The expansion box
must weigh 40#
--
On 7/12/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/12/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huh? Every NAT implementation I've used in the past five years has
supported NAT of UDP. What the heck are you using, Linux 2.0? :)
The main advantage I find with TCP is that in most IWF
On Jul 12, 2007, at 12:55, Thomas Charron wrote:
SIP can already do what you're talking about, without the server
needing to actually manage any sort of DNS records.
So, how does the SIP client know which server to connect to for
bfccomputing.com? My understanding is that SIP SRV records
On 7/12/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UDP is not bidirectional by nature.
I'm not really sure what you think that proves. IP is
connectionless, too. But most application protocols *are*
bidirectional by nature, including just about every UDP protocol ever
invented, including
On 7/12/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/12/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UDP is not bidirectional by nature.
I'm not really sure what you think that proves. IP is
connectionless, too. But most application protocols *are*
bidirectional by nature, including just
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 02:41:19PM -0400, Bill Sconce wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:17:25 -0400
Warren Luebkeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This reminds me of a discussion I had with Maddog and Bill Sconce earlier
this
week, regarding the possibility of a show-and-tell of some of these
Ed lawson wrote:
Anyone like to buy a functional OSI 4P-MF with a whopping 24K of memory?
Mini-floppy is 80K as I recall. All docs and original shipping box.
Or what about a TI-94A with expansion box? No that is a thing of
beauty. They really knew how how to make hardware. The expansion
On 7/12/07, Thomas Charron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And there is no reliably standard way to provide full UDP nat
traversal, which is why companies like Skype roll their own solution.
VoIP uses dynamic port numbers for connections, which is why you
need stateful, application-layer packet
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 06:09:06PM -0400, Jon 'maddog' Hall wrote:
Oh boy, a place where I can trot this out:
http://www.geezer.org/core-window/
:-)
It is missing the sense wire.
And/or the inhibit. (as noted in the caption, actually :) )
mm
It made quite an impression
being on the job all of 15 minutes then being asked to drop several
newly assembled machines from a height of 4 feet onto a thinly carpeted
manufacturing floor as part of a drop test. As I recall, in the 2 years
I worked there, we did that test exactly once.
On 7/12/07, Warren Luebkeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... regarding the possibility of a show-and-tell of some of these ancient
computers.
Would an abacus qualify? ;-)
Seriously, that does sound like a neat meeting night.
-- Ben
___
Oh boy, a place where I can trot this out:
http://www.geezer.org/core-window/
:-)
It is missing the sense wire.
md
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 18:14 -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
On 7/12/07, Warren Luebkeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... regarding the possibility of a show-and-tell of some of these ancient
computers.
Would an abacus qualify? ;-)
Seriously, that does sound like a neat meeting night.
--
And you could have your CRT in any color you wanted, as long as it was
green.
Or Amber (some later Kaypro/Vixen models)
If you stage a Computer Museum Rally, I'll drive up from beantown with
some items.
Besides the TRS80 mod III, I've got a programmable calculator whose
tower-case has 4 bit
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:10:15 -0400
From: Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Stupid UDP NAT argument (was: OpenVPN TCP vs UDP)
Okay, this is third (at least) time that you've done this... So I'm
going to respectfully suggest that you reconsider the arrogance with
which you choose your
30 matches
Mail list logo
